Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional boundary-layer transition on a cone at Mach 3.5

  • Originals
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A boundary-layer transition study on a sharp, 5° half-angle cone at various angles of attack was conducted at Mach 3.5. Transition data were obtained with and without significantly reduced freestream acoustic disturbance levels. A progressive downstream and upstream motion of the transition front on the windward and leeward rays, respectively, of the cone with angle of attack was observed for the high noise level data in agreement with data trends obtained in conventional (“noisy”) wind tunnels. However, the downstream movement was not observed to the same degree for the low noise level data in the present study. Transition believed to be crossflow dominated was found to be less receptive to freestream acoustic disturbances than first-mode (Tollmien-Schlichting) dominated transition. The previously-developed crossflow transition Reynolds number criterion, χ tr,max ≈200, was found to be inadequate for the current case. An improved criterion is offered, which includes compressibility and flow-geometry effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

f :

frequency, kHz

M :

Mach number

P :

pressure, N/m2

P t :

Preston tube pressure, N/m2

Re :

freestream Reynolds number, V S/v

S :

distance measured along cone surface from apex, cm

S p :

location of Preston tube measured from apex, cm

T :

temperature, °C

νmax :

maximum crossflow velocity (normal to edge inviscid streamline)

V :

resultant velocity

X :

axial distance measured along nozzle centerline from throat, cm

ΔX :

axial dimension of quiet test core, see Fig. 1

ΔY :

vertical dimension of quiet test core

ΔZ :

horizontal dimension of quiet test core

α :

angle of attack, deg

γ :

ratio of specific heats

δ :

laminar boundary-layer thickness, based on V/V e =0.995

ɛ i :

divergence angle between edge inviscid streamline and cone generator (ray), deg

ɛ s :

divergence angle between surface streamline and cone generator, deg

ɛ ν :

divergence angle between vortex and cone generator, deg

θ c :

cone half angle, deg

v :

kinematic viscosity

φ:

cone meridian angle (see Fig. 2), deg

χ :

crossflow Reynolds number, ν max δ/v e

χ* :

modified crossflow Reynolds number, \({\chi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\chi {[1 + \tfrac{{\gamma - 1}}{2}M_e^2 ]}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {[1 + \tfrac{{\gamma - 1}}{2}M_e^2 ]}}\)

e :

edge conditions

o :

tunnel stagnation conditions

tr :

conditions at transition onset

∞:

freestream conditions

−:

mean value

∼:

rms value

References

  • Adams, J. C. Jr. 1971: Three-dimensional laminar boundary-layer analysis of upwash patterns and entrained vortex formation on sharp cones at angle of attack. AEDC-TR-71-215

  • Beckwith, I. E.; Creel, T. R. Jr.; Chen, F.-J.; Kendall, J. M. 1983: Freestream noise and transition measurements on a cone in a Mach 3.5 Pilot Quiet Tunnel. AIAA Paper 83-0042

  • Chapman, G. T. 1961: Some effects of leading edge sweep on boundary-layer transition at supersonic speeds. NASA TN D-1075

  • Chen, F.-J.; Malik, M. R.; Beckwith, I. E. 1989: Boundary-layer transition on a cone and flat plate at Mach 3.5. AIAA J. 27, 687–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Dajeh, D. A. 1988: Stability of a supersonic boundary layer on a sharp cone at a small angle of attack. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Oklahoma

  • DiCristina, V. 1970: Three-dimensional laminar boundary-layer transition on a sharp 8° cone at Mach 10. AIAA J. 8, 852–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, L. E. 1969: Effect of boundary-layer transition on vehicle dynamics. J. Spacecr. & Rockets 6, 1404–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M. S. 1978: Studies of the effects of transitional and turbulent boundary layers on the aerodynamic performance of hypersonic re-entry vehicles in high Reynolds number flows. Calspan Report AB-5834-A-2

  • King, R. A. 1991: Mach 3.5 boundary-layer transition on a cone at angle of attack. AIAA Paper 91-1804

  • Krogmann, P. 1977:An experimental study of boundary layer transition on a slender cone at Mach 5. AGARD-CP-224, Symposium on laminar-turbulent transition, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, J. 1961: Aerodynamic noise in supersonic wind tunnels. J. Appl. Sci. 28, 685–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, L. M. 1984: Boundary-layer linear stability theory. AGARD Report 709

  • Malik, M. R.; Balakumar, P.; Chang, C.-L. 1991: Linear stability of hypersonic boundary layers (U). NASP 189

  • Martelluci, A.; Neff, R. S. 1970: The influence of asymmetric transition on re-entry vehicle motion. AIAA Paper 70-987

  • Mateer, G. G. 1972: The effect of angle of attack on boundary-layer transition on cones. AIAA J. 10, 1127–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. K. 1951: Laminar boundary layer on a circular cone in supersonic flow at a small angle of attack. NASA TN 2521

  • Morkovin, M. V. 1987: Transition at hypersonic speeds. NASA CR-178315

  • Owen, P. R.; Randall, D. G. 1952: Boundary layer transition on a sweptback wing. RAE TM Aero 277

  • Pate, S. R.; Schueler, C. J. 1969: Radiated aerodynamic noise effects on boundary-layer transition in supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels. AIAA J. 7, 450–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, S. R. 1978: Dominance of radiated aerodynamic noise on boundary-layer transition in supersonic-hypersonic wind tunnels-theory and application. AEDC-TR-77-107

  • Potter, J. L. 1975: Boundary-layer transition on supersonic cones in an aeroballistic range. AIAA J. 13, 270–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Reda, D. C. 1977: Boundary-layer transition experiments on sharp, slender cones in supersonic freeflight. NSWC/WOL TR 77-59

  • Reed, H. L.; Saric, W. S. 1989: Stability of three-dimensional boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 235–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, P. C. 1969: Effect of unit Reynolds number, nose bluntness, angle of attack, and roughness on transition on a 5° half-angle cone at Mach 8. NASA TN D-4961

  • Stetson, K. F. 1979: Effect of bluntness and angle of attack on boundary layer transition on cones and biconic configurations. AIAA paper 79-0269

  • Stetson, K. F. 1982: Mach 6 experiments of transition on a cone at angle of attack. J. Spacecr. & Rockets 19, 397–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. W.; Reu, T; McGrory, W. D.; Thomas J. L.; Richardson, P. F. 1988: A longitudinally-patched grid approach with applications to high speed flows. AIAA Paper 88-0715

  • Wie, Y.-S. 1990: A three-dimensional, compressible, laminar boundary-layer method for general fuselages. NASA CR-4292, Vols. 1 and 2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, R.A. Three-dimensional boundary-layer transition on a cone at Mach 3.5. Experiments in Fluids 13, 305–314 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209502

Keywords

Navigation