Skip to main content
Log in

Radioprotection of euoxic bacteria by phenothiazine drugs

  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Survival studies on irradiated euoxicE. coli B/r cells in presence of various concentrations of four radioprotecting phenothiazine drugs have been carried out. Maximum radioprotection was obtained at a optimal concentration for each drug and it decreased on either side of it. The DNA strand break studies at the maximum protective and non-protective concentrations of chlorpromazine and promethazine revealed that the number of ssbs in DNA were less at the protective concentration which were efficiently repaired by the type-III repair process. On the other hand, at the non-protective concentrations, inhibition of DNA repair was noticed and a higher number of DNA ssbs were detected. We suggest that the membrane is fluidized to a greater extent at the protective concentrations allowing the chemical restitution of damaged sites by NPSH compounds. At the non-protective high concentrations of the drugs, the membrane may be too grossly disorganised to allow any repair and at the same time high concentrations of the drugs or their radicals may also react with radioprotective intracellular sulphhydryls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akera T, Brody TM (1970) Inhibitory sites on sodium and potassium-activated adenosine triphosphate for chlorpromazine free radical and ouabain. Mol Pharmacol 6: 557–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper T (1968) Low oxygen enhancement ratios of radiosensitive bacterial strains and probable interaction of two types of primary lesion. Nature 217: 862–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton J, Viret J, Leterrier F (1977) Calcium and chlorpromazine interactions in rat synaptic plasma membranes. A spin label and fluorescence probe study. Arch Biochem Biophys 179: 625–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Dordjevic B (1979) Differential effect of procaine on irradiated mammalian cells in culture. Radiology 131: 515–520

    Google Scholar 

  • George KC, Srinivasan VT, Singh BB (1980) Cytotoxic effects of chlorpromazine and its interaction with radiation on a mouse fibrosarcoma. Int J Radiat Biol 38: 661–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Knippers R, Startling W (1970) The DNA replicating capacity of isolatedE. coli cell-wall-membrane complex. Nature 226: 713–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Lark KG, Repko T, Hoffman EJ (1963) The effect of a. acid deprivation on subsequent deoxyribonucleic acid replication. Biochim Biophys Acta 76: 9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert S, Moroson H (1971) X-ray induced single strand breaks in DNA ofE. coli B/r of irradiation and post-irradiation conditions. Radiat Res 45: 299–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniar HS, Singh BB (1983) Modification of radiation response ofE. coli B/r cells by phenothiazines. Int J Radiat Biol 44: 399–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair CKK, Pradhan DS (1975) Effect of procaine HCl on DNA repair inE. coli. Chem Biol Interact 11: 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan WT, Thompson JE, Lepock JR, Kruuv J (1981) Effect of membrane lipid perturbers on the temperature dependence of repair of sublethal and potentially lethal damage. Int J Radiat Biol 39: 195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule GS, Kruuv J, Lepock JR (1979) Membrane lipid fluidity as rate limiting in the concanavalin A-mediated agglutination ofpyBHK cells. Biochim Biophy Acta 556: 399–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy MA, George KC, Singh BB, Gopal-Ayengar AR (1975) Modification of radiation effects in single-cell systems by membrane binding agents. Int J Radiat Biol 28: 519–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy MA, Singh BB (1980) Cytotoxic and radiosensitising effects of chlorpromazine hydrochloride in Sarcoma 180A. Indian J Exp Biol 18: 791–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy MA, Singh BB, Gopal-Ayengar AR (1968) Iodine incorporated in cell senstituents during sensitization to radiation by iodoacetic acid. Science NY 160: 999

    Google Scholar 

  • Town CD, Smith KC, Kalpan HS (1973) The repair of DNA single strand breaks inE. coli K12 irradiated in the presence or absence of oxygen; influence of repair and cell survival. Radiat Res 55: 334–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Town CD, Smith KC, Kaplan HS (1974) Repair of X-ray damage to bacterial DNA. Curr Top Radiat Res 8: 351–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatvin MB (1976) Evidence that survival of gammairradiatedE. coli is influenced by membrane fluidity. Int J Radiat Biol 30: 571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatvin MB, Schmitz BJ (1980) Radiation killing ofE. coli K1060: Role of membrane fluidity, hypothermia and local anaesthetics. Int J Radiat Biol 37: 513–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau TM, Kim MS (1978) Radioprotection of mammalian cells by procaine. Br J Radiol 51: 551–552

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maniar, H.S., Nair, C.K.K. & Singh, B.B. Radioprotection of euoxic bacteria by phenothiazine drugs. Radiat Environ Biophys 23, 279–285 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407599

Keywords

Navigation