Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of the chromosomes in human primordial oocytes

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primordial oocytes (oocytes in primordial follicles) from human ovaries aged 51/2 months post conception to 11 3/4 years post partum were examined in: (a) squash preparations of fresh and fixed tissue; (b) histological preparations; and (c) thin sections by electron microscopy, in order to study the structure of the chromosomes. — The light microscope shows that the chromosome consists of a thread bearing numerous fine lateral appendages. Cytochemical tests indicate that the thread contains DNA, and is surrounded by material containing RNA and protein. — The electron microscope shows that there are three main structural components in the chromosome: (i) an axis or “core” containing at least two longitudinal strands about 200 Å thick; (ii) a surrounding sheath composed of coiled fibrils which form symmetrically arranged columns and loops, and (iii) clusters of large granules which are associated with the outer parts of the sheath. Small nucleoli and other granular bodies are also present. — These observations indicate the presence of lampbrush chromosomes in the human oocyte. The significance of this type of chromosome in mammals is discussed in relation to the differential radiosensitivity of the oocytes, and to the form of chromosomes at the dictyate stage in rodents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, T.G.: A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc. roy. Soc. B 158, 417–433 (1963); - The sensitivity of oocytes in postnatal rhesus monkeys to X-irradiation. J. Reprod. Fertil. 12, 183–192 (1966a); - A quantitative and cytological study of oogenesis in the rhesus monkey. J. Anat. (Lond.) 100, 761–776 (1966b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H.M. Beaumont: The radiosensitivity of oogonia and oocytes in the foetal and neonatal monkey. Nature (Lond.) 214, 981–983 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and L.L. Franchi: Fine structure of the nucleus in the primordial oocyte of primates. J. Anat. (Lond.) 100, 697–699 (1966a);- Lampbrush chromosomes in human oocytes. J. Anat. (Lond.) 100, 702 (1966b); - Fine structure of oogonia and oocytes in human ovaries. J. Cell Sci. 2, 213–224 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, H.M., and A.M. Mandl: A quantitative and cytological study of oogonia and oocytes in the foetal and neonatal rat. Proc. roy. Soc. B 155, 557–579 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, K.: Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase. Exp. Cell Res. 24, 495–507 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachet, J.: The use of basic dyes and ribonuclease for the cytochemical detection of ribonucleic acid. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 94, 1–10 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, H.G.: The lampbrush chromosomes of Sepia officinalis L., Anilocra physodes L. and Scyllium catulus Cuv. and their structural relationship to the lampbrush chromosomes of Amphibia. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 29, 329–346 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and L. Lloyd: Lampbrush chromosomes. In: Symposium on New Approaches - in Cell Biology (ed. P.M.B. Walker). New York and London: Academic Press 1960a; - Lampbrush chromosomes of crested newts Triturus cristatus (Lau- renti). Phil. Trans. B 243, 135–219 (1960b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. C. MacGregor: Action of deoxyribonuclease on lampbrush chromosomes. Nature (Lond.) 181, 1479–1480 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M., E.H. Davidson, and A.E. Mirsky: Persistence in early amphibian embryos of informational RNA's from the lampbrush chromosome stage of oogenesis. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 57, 885–892 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, D.W.: The fine structure of chromosomes in the meiotic prophase of vertebrate spermatocytes. J. biophys. bioehem. Cytol. 2, 403–406 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchi, L.L., and A.M. Mandl: The ultrastructure of oogonia and oocytes in the foetal and neonatal rat. Proc. roy. Soc. B 157, 99–114 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. Zuckerman: The development of the ovary and the process of oogenesis. In: The ovary (ed. S. Zuckerman, A. M. Mandl and P. Eckstein). New York: Academic Press 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J.G.: Lampbrush chromosomes from oocyte nuclei of the newt. J. Morph. 94, 283–351 (1954);- On the submicroscopic structure of chromosomes. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 8, 17–32 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H.G. Callan: H3 uridine incorporation in lampbrush chromosomes. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 48, 562–570 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M.L.: The oocyte of the domestic chicken shortly after hatching studied by electron microscopy. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 15, 297–316 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyénot, E., et M. Danon: Chromosomes et ovocytes des Batraciens. Rev. suisse Zool. 60, 1–129 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitaeva, O.N. (1960): Cit. by Mandl 1964.

  • Mandl, A.M.: The radiosensitivity of germ cells. Biol. Rev. 39, 288–371 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manotaya, T., and E.L. Potter: Oocytes in the prophase of meiosis from squash preparations of human fetal ovaries. Fertil. and Steril. 14, 378–392 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, O.L.: Fine structure of lampbrush chromosomes. J. nat. Cancer Inst. 18, 79–99 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, R.F. Carrier, and R.C. von Borstel: In situ and in vitro breakage of lampbrush chromosomes by X-radiation. Nature (Lond.) 206, 905–8 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebel, B.R., and E.M. Coulon: The fine structure of chromosomes in pigeon spermatocytes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 13, 272–291 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, S., W.D. Kaplan, and R. Kinosita: X-chromosome behavior in germ and somatic cells of Rattus norvegicus. Exp. Cell Res. 22, 535–544 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, H.P. Klinger, and N.B. Atkin: Human oogenesis. Cytogenetics 1, 42–51 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifferscheid, K.: Histologische Untersuchungen über die Beeinflussung menschlicher und tierischer Ovarien durch Röntgenstrahlen. Z. Röntgenol. 12, 233–254 (1910);- Die Einwirkung der Röntgenstrahlen auf tierische und menschliche Eierstöcke. Strahlentherapie 5, 407–426 (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rückert, J.: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Ovarialeies bei Selachiern. Anat. Anz. 7, 107–158 (1892).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda, H.: An electron microscope study on the oogenesis in the mouse, with special reference to the behaviours of oogonia and oocytes at meiotic prophase. Arch. histol. jap. 25, 533–555 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischnitzer, S.: The amphibian oocyte nucleus. Nucleus 4, 177–198 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, S.: The sensitivity of the gonad to radiation. Clin. Radiol. 16, 1–15 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, T.G., Franchi, L.L. The structure of the chromosomes in human primordial oocytes. Chromosoma 22, 358–377 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319880

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319880

Keywords

Navigation