Abstract
Both a small (S) and a large (L) stimulus occurred individually and randomly over trials. The task was to make the same speeded response to either stimulus. LSSS sequences on trials N-3, N-2, N-1, and N, respectively, resulted in a faster RT to S on trial N than to S on trial N-2. However, SLLL sequences did not produce a corresponding increase in detection. Also, overall, S was less detectable than L. Suppose that the physical S on trial N was lower in detectability-memorability than a memorial S produced by S on the immediately preceding trials N-1 and N-2. If so, the physical S may have assimilated in detectability-memorability to the memorial S, explaining why its detectability increased. In contrast, the physical L may have been sufficiently high in detectability-memorability to preclude a comparable assimilation. The theory: assimilation underlies detectability, regardless of whether two components are both physical (previous research), or whether one is physical and the other is memorial (the present research).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambler, B. A., & Proctor, J. D. (1976). The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 222–234.
Bagnara, S., Simion, F., Tagliabue, M. E., & Umilta, C. (1988). Comparison processes on visual mental images.Memory & Cognition, 16, 138–146.
Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations.Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241–248.
Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389–401.
Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response and signal-and-response repetition.Nature, 206, 217–218.
Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468–482.
Boles, D. B. (1992). Fast visual generation: Its nature and chronometrics.Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 239–246.
Boles, D. B., & Eveland, D. C. (1983). Visual and phonetic codes and the process of generation in letter matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 657–674.
Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 272–276.
Campbell, K. C., & Proctor, R. W. (1993). Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1345–1362.
Doyle, J. R., & Leach, C. (1988). Word superiority in signal detection: Barely a glimpse, yet reading nonetheless.Cognitive Psychology, 20, 283–318.
Egeth, H., & Smith, E. E. (1967). Physical selectivity in a visual recognition task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 543–549.
Entus, A., & Bindra, D. (1970). Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments.Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 143–148.
Epstein, W., & Rock, I. (1960). Perceptual set as an artifact of recency.American Journal of Psychology, 73, 214–228.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
Farell, B. (1985). “Same”-“different” judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419–456.
Finke, R. A., & Schmidt, M. J. (1977). Orientation-specific color aftereffects following imagination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 599–606.
Fuchs, W. (1967). The influence of form on the assimilation of colours. In W. D. Ellis (Ed. and Trans.),A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 95–103). New York: Humanities Press. (Original paper published 1923).
Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., & Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484–492.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.
Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operation.Memory & Cognition, 1, 401–412.
King, D. L. (1979).Conditioning: An image approach. New York: Gardner Press.
King, D. L. (1988a). Assimilation is due to the one perceived whole and contrast is due to two perceived wholes.New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 277–288.
King, D. L. (1988b). Strong phenomenal wholes are associated with fast “same” and slow “different” responses and superior overall performance.Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 485–493.
King, D. L., Hicks, H., & Brown, P. D. (1993). Context-produced increases in visibility.Psychological Research, 55, 10–14.
King, D. L., Mose, J. F., & Nixon, N. (1995a). One line decreases the visibility of a simultaneous identical distant second line.Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 393–401.
King, D. L., Phillips, W., & Mose, J. F. (1995b). The association of assimilation and an increase in visibility in perceptual grouping.Psychological Research, 58, 83–91.
King, D. L., Robinson, E. L., & Roberts, T. R. (1996). A dotted line assimilates in visibility to a solid line.Psychological Research, 59, 4–15.
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 657–672.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, M. J., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena.Psychological Review, 88, 291–326.
Prinzmetal, W., & Keysar, B. (1989). Functional theory of illusory conjuctions and neon colors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 165–190.
Prinzmetal, W., & Silvers, B. (1994). The word without the tachistoscope.Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 296–312.
Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1988). The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection.Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 355–366.
Rentschler, I., Hilz, R., & Grimm, W. (1975). Processing of positional information in the human visual system. Nature,253, 444–446.
Segal, S. J. (1972). Assimilation of a stimulus in the construction of an image: The Perky effect revisited. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.),The function and nature of imagery (pp 203–230). New York: Academic Press.
Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, J. C., & Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 607–617.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991).Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGrawHill.
Wood, L. E. (1977). Modality-specific coding in matching letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 329–335.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, D.L. Immediately preceding stimuli increase the detection of a less detectable but not a more detectable stimulus. Psychol. Res 59, 94–99 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01792430
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01792430