Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulatory high-dose 5-day continuous-infusion ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors: a feasibility study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The oxazaphosphorine analog ifosfamide (IFO) has demonstrated an increased therapeutic index in a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies compared with its parent compound cyclophosphamide. A fractionated dose schedule over 5 days as continuous infusion in combination with the uroprotective agent sodium-2-mercapto-ethane-sulfonate (mesna) is considered to provide an improved therapeutic/toxic ratio. Stability data of IFO demonstrate long-term stability for use in disposable infusion pumps as outpatient treatment. In all, 52 patients with various malignancies were entered in a feasibility study to receive outpatient continuous infusion of IFO. All patients were required to have a subcutaneous venous port system implanted. The following drug combinations were used: IFO as single agent, IFO/mitoxantrone, IFO/carboplatinum/etoposide, IFO/etoposide/MTX, IFO/epirubicin. Mitoxantrone and epirubicin were given as continuous infusion together with IFO. Starting dose of IFO was between 1.6–2.0 g/m2/day×5 and was increased in absence of major hematologic or peripheral toxicitiy. Mesna was given in combination with IFO as continuous infusion at a dose of 50% of that calculated for IFO. No renal, bladder or central nervous system toxicity was observed. In 247 courses of outpatient continuous ifosfamide infusion only few technical complications due to improper handling were documented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IFO:

ifosfamide

References

  1. Bramwell VHC, Mouridsen HT, Santoro A, et al. (1987) Cyclophoshamide versus ifosfamide: final report of a randomized phase II trial in adult soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  2. Posey LE, Morgan L, Carter RD, et al. (1980) A comparison of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 19:338 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Teufel G, Pfleiderer A (1976) Ifosfamid im Vergleich zu Endoxan bei fortgeschrittenen Ovarialkarzinomen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 36:274

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker WG (1977) Ifosfamide in the treatment of lung cancer. In: Burkert H, Voigt HC (eds) Proceedings of the International Holoxan Symposium, Düsseldorf. Asta-Werke, Bielefeld, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson RL, Allen LM, Creaven PC (1975) Pharmacokinetics of divided dose ifosfamide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 19:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein HO, Dias Wickramanayake P, Coerper C, et al. (1973) High-dose ifofamide and mesna as continuous infusion over five days. A phase I/II trial. Cancer Treat Rev 10:167–173 (Suppl A)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rowland CG, Bradford E, Adams P, et al. (1984) Infusion of ifosamide and mesna. Lancet 2:468 (letter)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Radford JA, Margison J, Dunn G, et al. (1989) The stability of ifosfamide and ifosfamide/mesna in aqueous solution. Proceedings ECCO 5:89, Abstract 6.3.25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elias A, Ryan L, Sulkes A, et al. (1989) Response to mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine in 108 patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma and no prior chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 7:1208–1216

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antman KH, Ryan L, Elias A, et al. (1989) Response to ifosfamide and mesna: 124 patients previously treated with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 7:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez V, Bodey GP, Freireich EJ (1976) Reduction of ifosfamide toxicity using dose fractionation. Cancer Res 36:2945–2948

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elias AD, Eder JP, Shea T, et al. (1990) High-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection: a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 8:170–178

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner T, Heydrich D, Jork T, et al. (1981) Comparative study on human pharmacokinetics of activated ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide by a modified fiuorometric test. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 100:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan LR, Harrison EF, Hawke JE, et al. (1982) Toxicity of single vs. fractionated dose ifosfamide in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. Semin Oncol 9:66–70 (Suppl I)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Margison JM, Wilkinson PM, Cerny T, et al. (1986) A simple quantitative HPLC assay for ifosfamide in biological fluids. Biomedical Chromatography 1:101–103

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson C, Gunven P, Theve NO (1986) Comparative pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and epirubicin in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 70:947–952

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Belle SJP, de Planque MM, Smith IE, et al. (1986) Pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone in humans following single-agent infusion or intra-arterial injection therapy or combined-agent infusion therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 18:27–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loeffler, T.M., Weber, F.W. & Hausamen, T.U. Ambulatory high-dose 5-day continuous-infusion ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors: a feasibility study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 117 (Suppl 4), S125–S128 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613216

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613216

Key words

Navigation