Skip to main content
Log in

Amphicarpum purshii and the “pessimistic strategy” in amphicarpic annuals with subterranean fruit

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Amphicarpum purshii Kunth is an annual amphicarpic grass of recently disturbed sandy areas in the Coastal Plain of eastern North America, producing small aerial and larger subterranean seeds. At study sites on the eastern edge of the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, the temporal aspects of reproductive allocation were investigated through biweekly whole-plant field harvests of 25 plants each throughout the 1980 growing season, and the survivorship of plants arising from aerial and subterranean seeds was monitored in a total of 10 high and 10 low density quadrats at two sites differeing in soil moisture. Plants arising from subterranean propagules began to allocate early (July 16) considerable energy to subterranean reproduction (ca 40% of whole-plant dry weight by the last half of August); allocation to aerial culms and flowers did not begin until mid-August and never exceeded 3% on a population basis. Plants arising from aerial propagules (“aerial plants”) produced only subterranean flowers, and these flowers first appeared 2 wk later than they did on “subterranean plants.” Survivorship was greater for the subterranean seedlings at both the dry and wet sites and at low and high densities, and aerial plants showed significantly less total growth and seed production than subterranean plants. The “pessimistic strategy” (early allocation of energy to large subterranean propagules) in the annual Amphicarpum has its selective basis in the relative vigor, survival, and timing and amount of reproduction of the two types of seedlings, and appears comparable to the allocation strategies of at least eight other amphicarpic annuals in at least five other families of plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biel ER (1958) The climate of New Jersey. In: The economy of New Jersey. New Brunswick NJ, USA: Rutgers Univ Press, pp 53–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd GD, Thomas PEL, Allison JCS (1979) Vegetative regeneration, depth of germination and seed dormancy in Commelina benghalensis L. Rhod J Agric Res 17:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1971) Maximizing final yield when growth is limited by time or by limiting resources. J Theor Biol 33:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1976) The optimal timing of reproduction. Amer Nat 110:801–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenari M (1963) Zur Keimungsökologie zweier Wüstenpflanzen. Mitt Flor Soz Arb-Gem 10:70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenari M, Kadouri A, Gutterman Y (1977) Eco-physiological investigations on the amphicarpy of Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. Flora 166:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewart AJ (1930) Flora of Victoria. Melbourne, Australia: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Solbrig OT (1972) The concept of r- and K-selection: Evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Amer Nat 106:14–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (1981) Serotiny, geography, and fire in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Evolution 35:101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines RW, Lye KA (1977) Studies in African Cyperaceae XV. Amphicarphy and spikelet structure in Trianoptiles solitaria. Bot Notiser 130:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock AS (1951) Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. (Revised by A. Chase) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dep. Agric Misc Publ 200

  • Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The world's worst weeds. Distribution and biology. Honolulu: Univ. Press of Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe JS (1933) Soil profile studies. V Mature podzols. Soil Science 35:313–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt HE, Johnson RW (1977) Weeds of Queensland. Queensland, Australia: Government Printer

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller D, Roth N (1964) Studies on the ecological and physiological significance of amphicarpy in Gymnarrhena micrantha (Compositae). Amer J Bot 51:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz HJ (1934) Ecological relations in the pitch pine plains of southern New Jersey. Yale Univ School of Forestry Bull 38:1–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari P, Bahadur S (1934) A preliminary note on the morphology of the aerial and underground flowers of Commelina benghalensis Linn. Current Science 3:158–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattatia J (1976) The relationships between amphicarpic plants and their environment. PhD thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattatia J (1977a) The amphicarpic species Lathyrus ciliolatus. Bot Notiser 129:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattatia J (1977b) Amphicarpy and variability in Pisum fulvum. Bot Notiser 130:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara J, Quinn JA (1977) Resource allocation and reproduction in populations of Amphicarpum purshii (Gramineae). Amer J Bot 64:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge GW, Denholm JV (1974) Plant yield and the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth. J Theor Biol 44:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Plitmann U (1973) Biological flora of Israel. 4. Vicia sativa subsp. amphicarpa (Dorth.) Aschers & Graebn. Israel J Bot 22:178–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JA (1975) Variability among Danthonia sericea (Gramineae) populations in responses to substrate moisture levels. Amer J Bot 62:884–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury EJ (1942) The reproductive capacity of plants. London: Bell

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw EA (1965) Taxonomic revision of some Australian endemic genera of Cruciferae. Trans Roy Soc S Aust 89:145–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW (1956) Statistical methods. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutamire WP (1980) Personal communication. Akron, Ohio USA: Department of Biology, University of Akron

  • Uphof JCT (1938) Cleistogamic flowers. Bot Review 44:21–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent TL, Pulliam HR (1980) Evolution of life history strategies for an asexual annual plant model. Theor Pop Biol 17:215–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss PW (1980) Germination, reproduction and interference in the amphicarpic annual Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. Oecologia (Berl) 45:244–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton NJ, USA: Princeton Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1978) Reproductive behavior of plants in time. Amer Nat 112:636–639

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheplick, G.P., Quinn, J.A. Amphicarpum purshii and the “pessimistic strategy” in amphicarpic annuals with subterranean fruit. Oecologia 52, 327–332 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367955

Keywords

Navigation