Skip to main content
Log in

Polyhedra of regularp-nary group problems

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

The duality for group problems developed in [3] is restricted top-nary group problems. Results for ternary group problems are obtained similar to those obtained by Fulkerson and Lehman for the binary case. A complete facet description of the group polyhedron is available for a group problem having the Fulkerson property. A group problem has the Fulkerson property if its vertices are the facets of the blocking group problem and if its facets are the vertices of the blocking group problem. The Fulkerson property is a generalization of the max-flow min-cut theorem of Ford and Fulkerson which is interpreted as a statement about the pair of row modules arising from a group problem. We show that a group problem has the Fulkerson property if the corresponding row module is regular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.E. Bixby, “On Reids characterization of the ternary matroids,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 26 (1979) 174–204.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Chopra, “Dual row modules and polyhedra of blocking group problems,” Ph.D. Dissertation, SUNY Stony Brook, August 1986.

  3. S. Chopra and E.L. Johnson, “Dual row modules and polyhedra of blocking group problems,”Mathematical Programming 38 (1987) 229–270.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.W. Dijkstra, “A note on two problems in connection with graphs,”Numerische Mathematik 1 (1959) 269–271.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Edmonds, “Matroids and the greedy algorithm,”Mathematical Programming 1 (1971) 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.R. Fulkerson, “Blocking Polyhedra,” in: B. Harris, ed.,Graph Theory and Its Applications (Academic Press, NY, 1970) 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.R. Fulkerson, “Networks, Frames, Blocking Systems,” in: G.B. Dantzig and A.F. Veinott, Jr., eds.,Mathematics of the Decision Sciences, Part 1 (American Mathematical Society, 1968) pp. 303–334.

  8. G. Gastou, “On facets of integer programming polyhedra,” Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (1982).

  9. G. Gastou and E.L. Johnson, “Binary group and Chinese postman polyhedra,”Mathematical Programming 34 (1986) 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Gomory, “An algorithm for integer solutions to linear programs,” in: R.L. Graves and P. Wolfe, eds.,Recent Advances in Mathematical Programming (McGraw-Hill, 1963) pp. 269–302.

  11. R.E. Gomory, “On the relation between integer and noninteger solutions to linear programs,”Proceedings of N.A.S. 53 (1965) 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.E. Gomory, “Some polyhedra related to combinatorial problems,”Linear Algebra and Its Applications 2(4) (October 1969) 451–558.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Hall,The Theory of Groups, second edition (Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Hartley and T.O. Hawkes,Rings, Modules and Linear Algebra (Chapman and Hall Ltd., London).

  15. E.L. Johnson, “On cut-set integer Polyhedra,”Cahiers du Centre d'Etudes de Recherche Operationelle 17 (1975) 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.L. Johnson, “On the generality of the subadditive characterization of facets,”Mathematics of Operations Research 6 (1981) 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.L. Johnson, “On binary group problems having the Fulkerson property,” Lecture notes from CIME Summer School, Como (1986), to be published by Springer-Verlag.

  18. E.L. Johnson, “Support functions, Blocking pairs, and Anti-Blocking pairs,”Mathematical Programming Study 8 (1978) 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.L. Johnson, “Integer Programming: facets, subadditivity and duality for group and semi-group problems,” CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 32, SIAM, Philadelphia (1980).

  20. A. Lehman, “A solution to the Shannon switching game,”SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 12 (1964) 687–725.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Lehman, “On the length-width inequality,”Mathematical Programming 17 (1979) 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. MacLane and G. Birkhoff,Algebra (The MacMillan Co., New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.D. Seymour, “The forbidden minors of binary clutters,”Journal London Mathematical Society (2) 12 (1976) 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P.D. Seymour, “A note on the production of matroid minors,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 22 (1977) 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P.D. Seymour, “Matroids with the max-flow min-cut property,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 23 (1977) 189–222.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.D. Seymour, “Matroids and multicommodity flows,”European Journal Combinatorics 2 (1981) 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P.D. Seymour, “Matroid Representation over GF(3),”Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 26 (1979) 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W.T. Tutte, “Lectures on matroids,”Journal of Research National Bureau of Standards 69 B (1965) 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.T. Tutte,Introduction to the Theory of Matroids (American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D.J.A. Welsh,Matroid Theory (Associated Press, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Whitney, “On the abstract properties of linear dependence,”American Journal of Mathematics 57 (1935) 507–533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chopra, S., Jensen, D.L. & Johnson, E.L. Polyhedra of regularp-nary group problems. Mathematical Programming 43, 1–29 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582275

Key words

Navigation