Abstract
Prolene, perlon, supramid and titanium, either used as sutures, ‘Strampelli’ sutures or artificial lens loops, were compared after remaining in the human eye for at least one year. For comparison, non-implanted samples of each of the materials were used as blanks. Prolene and Perlon in particular showed severe biodégradation after a given period; Supramid showed much less degradation of its surface. Titanium showed a rather rough outer surface (even in the non-implanted samples), particularly as bends in the lens loop, which facilitated the adherence of cells, fibres and microorganisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple J, Mamalis N, Bradley SE, Loftfield K, Kavka-van Norman D and Olson RJ (1984) Biocompatibility of implant materials; A review and scanning electronmicroscopic study. Amer Intraocular Implant Soc J 10:53–64
Drews RC and Smith ME (1978) Scanning electionmicroscopy of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 85:415–423
Drews RC (1983) Quality control and changing indications for lens implantations. The Seventh Binkhorst Medal Lecture 1982. Ophthalmology 90:301–310
Drews RC (1983) Polypropylene in the human eye. Amer Intraocular Implant Soc J 9:137–142
Hessburg PhC (1985) Evidence still supports polypropylene haptics. Ocular Surg News 3/5:1
Olson RJ (1979) Intraocular lens quality, update 1979. Amer Intraocular Implant Soc J 6:16–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jongebloed, W.L., Figueras, M.J., Humalda, D. et al. Mechanical and biochemical effects of man-made fibres and metals in the human eye, a SEM-study. Doc Ophthalmol 61, 303–312 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142357
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142357