Skip to main content
Log in

The “Steakhouse syndrome”

Primary and definitive diagnosis and therapy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Over a period of 5 years, 28 instances of acute food impaction of the esophagus were documented in 26 patients at our institution. In all patients the impacted bolus was successfully removed without complication using a flexible endoscope. Underlying diseases were identified during primary endoscopy in 31% of the cases. Further diagnostic workup was performed in all but 5 of the patients. After adequate evaluation pathologic findings were demonstrated in 90% of the cases (38% malignant and 52% benign diseases). Long-term therapy was deemed necessary in 17 of these 21 patients. Operative intervention was indicated in 4 cases, 2 of which were for malignant tumors. Acute food impaction should always be regarded as a symptom of esophageal disorders. In patients with esophageal cancer or other mediastinal tumors bolus impaction generally indicates an advanced tumor stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bortolotti M, Labo G (1981) Clinical and manometric effects of Nifedipine in patients with esophageal achalasia. Gastroenterology 80: 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedland GW (1983) The treatment of acute esophageal food impaction. Radiology 149: 601–602

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hargrove MD, Boyce HW (1970) Meat impaction of the esophagus. Arch Intern Med 125: 277–281

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holsinger JW, Fuson RL, Sealy WC (1968) Esophageal perforation following meat impaction and papain ingestion. JAMA 204: 188–189

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleinmann MS (1976) Management of foreign bodies in the esophagus. JAMA 236: 2054

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nighbert E, Dorton H, Griffin WO (1968) Enzymatic relief of the “Steakhouse syndrome”. Am J Surg 116: 467–469

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nixon GW (1979) Foley catheter method of foreign body removal: extension of applications. AJR 132: 441–442

    Google Scholar 

  8. Norton RA, King GD (1963) “Steakhouse syndrome”: the symptomatic lower esophageal ring. Lahey Clin Found Bull 13: 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer ED (1976) Backyard barbecue syndrome. JAMA 235: 2637–2638

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rice BT, Spiegel PK, Dombrowski PJ (1983) Acute esophageal food impaction treated by gas-forming agents. Radiology 146: 299–301

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selivanov V (1984) Management of foreign body ingestion. Ann Surg 199: 187–191

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siewert JR, Lepsien G, Schattenmann G, Weiser HF (1980) Therapieergebnisse peptischer Oesophagusstenosen. Langenbecks Arch Chir 353: 155–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JC, Janower ML, Geiger AH (1986) Use of glucagon and gas-forming agents in acute esophageal food impaction. Radiology 159: 567–568

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trenkner SW (1983) Esophageal food impaction: treatment with glucagon. Radiology 149: 401–403

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vizcarrondo FJ, Brady PG, Nord HJ (1983) Foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 29: 208–210

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yackee J, Lipson A, Wassermann AG (1986) Electrocardiographic changes suggestive of cardiac ischemia in a patient with esophageal food impaction. JAMA 255: 2065–2066

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stadler, J., Hölscher, A.H., Feussner, H. et al. The “Steakhouse syndrome”. Surg Endosc 3, 195–198 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02171545

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02171545

Key words

Navigation