Abstract
The effect of splenectomy on neoplastic outgrowth was examined prior to and after implantation of methylcholanthrene-induced C3H/He murine tumors. Splenectomy performed 12 days before tumor inoculation did not affect the tumor outgrowth, however, both splenectomy and sham operation performed shortly before tumor inoculation resulted in significant tumor facilitation compared with the non-operated group, suggesting that this accelerated tumor was not related to the presence or absence of splenic tissue, but rather to systemically-induced immunosuppression. While splenectomy performed 6, 9, 12 days after tumor inoculation did not alter the tumor growth, splenectomy performed early (3 days) or late stage (20 days) after tumor cell challenge revealed a retarded neoplastic outgrowth, compared with the sham operated group. These results suggest that splenectomy in very early and late stages of tumor-bearing host may be effective for tumor treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrer JF. Role of the spleen in passive immunological enhancement. Transplantation 1968; 6: 167–72.
Möller E. Interaction between tumor and host during progressive neoplastic growth in histocompatible recipients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1965; 35: 1053–9.
Old LJ, Clarke DA, Benacerraf B, Stockert E. Effect of prior splenectomy on the growth of sarcoma 180 in normal and bacillus Calmette-Guerin infected mice. Experientia 1962; 18: 335–346.
Milas L, Mujagic H. The effect of splenectomy on fibrosarcoma metastases in lungs of mice. Int J Cancer 1973; 11: 186–190.
Change RW, Turk JL. Increased resistance in splenectomized mice to a methylcholanthrene-induced tumor. Br J Cancer 1977; 35: 768–776.
Orita K, Konaga E, Okada, T, Kunisada K, Yumura M, Tanaka S. Effect of splenectomy in tumor-bearing mice and gastric cancer patients. Gann 1977; 68: 731–736.
Pollack SB. Effect of host sex and splenectomy on Moloney virus-induced sarcoma. Int J Cancer 1971; 8: 264–271.
Squartini F, Bolis GB. Mammary tumorgenesis in splenectomized mice. Tex Rep Biol Med 1970; 28: 115.
Gershon RK, Carter RL. Factors controlling concomitant immunity in tumor-bearing hamsters; Effect of prior splenectomy and tumor removal. J Nat Cancer Inst 1969; 43: 533–543.
Faraci RP, Marrone JC, Lesser GR, Ketcham AS. The effect of splenectomy on tumor immunity and the metastatic spread of a murine reticulum cell sarcoma, Panminerva Medica 1975; 17: 59–65.
Bard DS, Pilch YH. The role of the spleen in the immunity to a chemically induced sarcoma in C3H mice. Cancer Res 1969; 29: 1125–31.
Jessup JM, Brandherst JS, Peters LC, Hanna MG. The splenic influence on BCG-mediated therapy in a syngeneic guinea pig tumor model. In: Battisto JR, Streilein JW, ed. Immunoaspects of the Spleen. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, 1976; 391–9.
Rumi L, Pasqualini CD, Rabasa SL. Growth of sarcoma 180 in splenectomized mice bearing diffusion chambers containing spleen or tumor cells. Eur J Cancer 1971; 7: 551–5.
Whitney RB, Barbara L, Pope L, Levy G. Immune competence and immunosuppressive factors in splenectomized tumor-bearing mice. Cell Immunol 1977; 28: 15–21.
Yamagishi H, Pellis NR, Kahan BD. Surgical immunodepression: Role of splenic suppressor cells. Surgical Forum 1978; 29: 465–468.
Yamagishi H, Pellis NR, Kahan BD. Effect of splenectomy upon tumor growth; characterization of splenic tumor-enhancing cells in vivo. Surgery 1980; 86: 655–661.
Yamagishi H, Oka T, Hashimoto I, Pellis NR, Kahan BD. The role of spleen in tumor bearing host. I. Characterization of spleen cells in tumor-bearing mice. Jpn J Surgery 1984; 14: 61–71.
Yamagishi H, Naito K, Maeda Y, Kurioka H, Kobayashi M, Fujimoto T, Iguchi K, Tanaka T, Hashimoto I. Immunological estimation of splenectomy in tumor-bearing mice. Jpn J Surg. (in Japanese, 1984; 84: 987–991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamagishi, H., Oka, T., Hashimoto, I. et al. The role of the spleen in tumor bearing host: II. The influence of splenectomy in mice. The Japanese Journal of Surgery 14, 72–77 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02469606
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02469606