Skip to main content
Log in

Teliospores of smut fungi general aspects of teliospore walls and sporogenesis

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The concept and nomenclature for the elements of teliospore walls in smut fungi are presented and a survey of teliosporogenesis is given, as seen by light and transmission electron microscopy. Four developmental types are distinguished: the Ustilago, Microbotryum, Tilletia, and Entorrhiza type. In the Ustilago type, sporogenous hyphae are completely segmented into teliospore initials which are embedded in a hyaline matrix formed by gelatinised hyphal walls (found in species ofAnthracoidea, Cintractia, Heterotolyposporium, Kuntzeomyces, Macalpinomyces, Melanopsichium, Sporisorium, Testicularia, Tolyposporium junci, Trichocintractia, and species ofUstilago infecting members of the family Poaceae). In the Microbotryum type, septate sporogenous hyphae are also completely segmented into teliospore initials, however, they are not surrounded by a hyaline matrix (Microbotryum, Sphacelotheca, Ustilago spp. infecting dicotyledons). A yeast-like budding of teliosporogenic cells is observed for some species ofMicrobotryum, Sphacelotheca, andUstilago infecting dicotyledons. In the Tilletia type, teliospores differentiate locally in the sporogenous hyphae, in an apical or intercalary position, without a hyaline matrix (Conidiosporomyces, Doassinga, Entyloma, Erratomyces, Ingoldiomyces, Neovossia, Oberwinkleria, Rhamphospora, Tilletia). In all these types, the teliospore initials first develop a hyaline sheath under which the ornamentation, the exosporium, sometimes a middle layer, and the endosporium are successively deposited by the fungal cell. In the Entorrhiza type, the teliospores develop inside vital host cells with the wall of the sporogenous hypha included into the teliospore wall. The fungus develops a middle layer and an electron-transparent endosporium inside the hyphal wall while a layer forming the ornamentation is deposited onto the hyphal wall, probably by vesicles of dictyosomes of the host cell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth GC, Sampson K (1950) The British smut fungi (Ustilaginales). The Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerson HV, Van Dyke CG (1978) The ontogeny of echinulation (spines) in uredospores ofPuccinia sparganioides. Exp Mycol 2: 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Audran J-C, Batcho M (1980) Aspects infrastructuraux des altérations des anthères deSilene dioica parasitées parUstilago violacea. Can J Bot 58: 405–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartnicki-Garcia S (1973) Fundamental aspects of hyphal morphogenesis. In: Ashworth JM, Smith JE (eds) Microbial differentiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Oberwinkler F, Vánky K (1997) Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Can J Bot 75: 1273–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (1997) Phylogenetic studies on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. Can J Bot 75: 2045–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham DD (1888) On a new genus of the family Ustilagineae. Sci Mem Off Med Dept Gov India 3: 27–32 + Pls. I–II

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bary A (1884) Vergleichende Morphologie und Biologie der Pilze, Mycetozoen und Bacterien. Protomyces und die Ustilagineen. Engelmann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoog GS, Boekhout T (1982) Teliospores, teliospore-mimics and chlamydospores. Stud Mycol 22: 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Deml G, Oberwinkler F (1981) Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes, part 4: investigations onEntorrhiza casparyana by light and electron microscopy. Mycologia 73: 392–398

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1982) Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes, part 24: onUstilago violacea (Pers.) Rouss. fromSaponaria officinalis L. Phytopathol Z 104: 345–356

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Nebel M, Oberwinkler F (1980) Light and scanning electron microscopic studies of spore formation inUstilago pustulata andU. scabiosae. Can J Bot 59: 122–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman G (1969) Handbook of palynology: morphology, taxonomy, ecology. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineran BA, Fineran JM (1984) Teliospores ofEntorrhiza casparyana (Ustilaginales): a correlated thin-sectioning and freeze-fracture study of endogenously dormant spores. Can J Bot 62: 2525–2539

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineran JM (1980) The structure of galls induced byEntorrhiza C. Weber (Ustilaginales) on roots of the Cyperaceae and Juncaceae. Nova Hedwigia 32: 265–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer GW, Holton CS (1957) Biology and control of the smut fungi. Ronald Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer von Waldheim A (1869) Beiträge zur Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ustilagineen. Jahrb Wiss Bot 7: 61–144 + Pls. 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes-Dávila G, Durán R (1986)Tilletia indica: cytology and teliospore formation in vitro and in immature kernels. Can J Bot 64: 1712–1719

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SO (1960) The morphology and a chemical analysis of the teliospore of the dwarf bunt fungus,Tilletia contraversa. Mycologia 52: 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson RL, Lacy ML (1975) Development and nuclear history of the teliospores ofUrocystis colchici. Phytopathology 65: 994–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim P (1962) Observations sur l'évolucion nucléaire des Ustilaginées. Rev Mycol (Paris) 27: 177–198 + Pls. IX–X

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins HL, Lutman BF (1938) Spine development in the spores ofUstilago zeae. Phytopathology 28: 859–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser W (1936) Zur Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte einigerEntyloma-Arten. Angew Bot 18: 81–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatygin IV (1981) Golovnevye griby: ontogenez i filogenez. (Smut fungi: ontogeny and phylogeny). Nauka, Leningrad

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna A, Payak MM (1968) Teliospore morphology of some smut fungi II: light microscopy. Mycologia 60: 655–662

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1972) Teliospore morphology of some smut fungi IV:Sphacelotheca reiliana. Nova Hedwigia 23: 907–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen I (1963) Taxonomic studies on the genusAnthracoidea (Ustilaginales). Ann Bot Soc Zool Bot Fenn Vanamo 34: 1–122

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Raudaskoski M (1964) Studies on the probable homothallism and pseudo-homothallism in the genusAnthracoidea. Ann Bot Fenn 1: 257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Vaissalo T (1964) An electron microscope study on spore formation in a smut. Ann Bot Fenn 1: 236–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon RFN, Fullerton RA (1975) Sorus ontogeny and sporogenesis in some smut fungi. Austr J Bot 23: 915–930

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1977)Macalpinomyces, a new genus of smut fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 68: 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Madelin MF (1966) The genesis of spores of higher fungi. In: Madelin MF (ed) The fungus spore. Butterworths, London, pp 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendgen K, Welter K, Scheffold F, Knauf-Breiter G (1991) High pressure freezing of rust infected plant leaves. In: Mendgen K, Lesemann DE (eds) Electron microscopy of plant pathogens. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Mims CW, Snetselaar KM (1991) Teliospore maturation in the smut fungusSporisorium sorghi: an ultrastructural study using freeze substitution fixation. Bot Gaz 152: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, Richardson EA (1992) Ultrastructure of the leaf stripe smut fungusUstilago striiformis: host-pathogen relationship and teliospore development. Int J Plant Sci 153: 289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagler A (1986) Untersuchungen zur Gattungsabgrenzung vonGinanniella Ciferri undUrocystis Rabenhorst sowie zur Ontogenie vonThecaphora seminis-convolvuli (Desm.) Ito. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Payak MM (1964) Palynology of fungi. In: Nair PKK (eds) Recent advances in palynology. National Botanic Gardens, Lucknow, pp 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (1995)Trichocintractia, a new genus forCintractia utriculicola (Ustilaginales). Can J Bot 73: 1089–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996) Smut fungi (Ustilaginales and Tilletiales) in Costa Rica. Nova Hedwigia, Beih 113: 1–155

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bauer R (1997)Erratomyces, a new genus of Tilletiales with species on Leguminosae. Mycologia 89: 924–936

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Vánky K, Oberwinkler F (1996)Aurantiosporium, a new genus forUstilago subnitens (Ustilaginales). Plant Syst Evol 199: 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (1998a) Teliospores of smut fungi: teliospore walls and the development of ornamentation studied by electron microscopy. Protoplasma 204: 170–201

    Google Scholar 

  • — — — (1998b) Teliospores of smut fungi: teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores studied by electron microscopy; phylogenetic discussion of characteristics of teliospores. Protoplasma 204: 202–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Prillieux E (1880) Sur la formation et la germination des spores desUrocystis (Ustilaginées). Bull Soc Bot France 27: 204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson RW, Luttrell ES (1987) Ultrastructure of teliospore ontogeny inTilletia indica. Mycologia 79: 753–763

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, Fuller MS (1990) Mycoparasitism of teliospores ofUstilago bullata by an oomycete. Can J Bot 68: 2415–2421

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfert R (1927) Über Schnallenbildung im Paarkernmyzel der Brandpilze. Z Bot 19: 577–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara M (1973) Anatomical studies on barley loose smut (Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostrup) IV. Bull Coll Agric Vet Med Nihon Univ 30: 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1962) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. J Cramer, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Snetselaar K, Mims CW (1994) Light and electron microscopy ofUstilago maydis hyphae in maize. Mycol Res 98: 347–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Stempell KL (1934) Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte einigerEntyloma-Arten und über die systematische Stellung der Familie der Sporobolomycetes. Z Bot 28: 225–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Trione EJ (1980) Teliospore formation byUstilago scitaminea in sugarcane. Phytopathology 70: 513–516

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Hess WM, Stockwell VO (1989) Growth and sporulation of the dikaryons of the dwarf bunt fungus in wheat plants and in culture. Can J Bot 67: 1671–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulasne L-R, Tulasne C (1847) Mémoire sur les ustilaginées comparees aux Urédinées. Ann Sci Nat Bot Sér 37: 12–127 + Pls. 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vánky K (1987) Illustrated genera of smut fungi. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991) Spore morphology in the taxonomy of Ustilaginales. Trans Mycol Soc Japan 32: 381–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter K, Müller M, Mendgen K (1988) The hyphae ofUromyces appendiculatus within the leaf tissue after high pressure freezing and freeze substitution. Protoplasma 147: 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambettakis C (1970) Les caractères qui régissent la classification des Ustilaginales. Rev Mycol (Paris) 34: 399–415

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part 164 in the series “Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes” from the Botanical Institute, University of Tübingen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepenbring, M., Bauer, R. & Oberwinkler, F. Teliospores of smut fungi general aspects of teliospore walls and sporogenesis. Protoplasma 204, 155–169 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280322

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280322

Keywords

Navigation