Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation and comparison of micro-techniques for concentration of volatile components from dilute solutions

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Several micro-techniques for the removal of solvent from dilute solutions of volatile compounds have been compared. Large solute losses were experienced when the conventional blow-down technique was applied. Better yields could be obtained with static evaporation procedures, as long as an effective reflux was maintained. However, careful optimization of the vessel design and operating conditions is necessary. The most efficient volume reduction technique was shown to be chromatographic evaporation. Quantitative recoveries were obtained for the compounds tested and the process was significantly faster than static concentration. Moreover, operating conditions (gas flow, temperature) are less critical. With modifications, the principle can be used for the concentration of large sample volumes down to a few microliters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. D. Bowers, M. L. Parsons, R. E. Clement, F. W. Karasek, J. Chromatogr.207, 203 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. L. Stedman, R. L. Miller, J. Chromatogr.11, 409 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. D. Erickson, M. T. Giguere, D. A. Whitaker, Anal. Lett.14, 841 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. W. Karasek, R. E. Clement, J. A. Sweetman, Anal. Chem.53, 1050A (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Jennings, A. Rapp, “Sample Preparation for GC Analyses”, Alfred Hüthig Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, FRG, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Beyermann, “Organic Trace Analysis”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. F. Poole, A. Schuette, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. & Chromatogr. Commun.6, 526 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. G. C. Clarke, A. E. Hawkins, J. Pharm. Pharmacol.12, 509 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Beyermann, A. Kessler, P. W. Ungerer, Z. Anal. Chem.251, 289 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Dünges, “Prächromatographische Mikromethoden”, Alfred Hüthig Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, FRG, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Roeraade, S. Blomberg, Chromatographia,17, 387 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. R. Deans, Anal. Chem.43, 2026 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Francke, Universität Hamburg. 1986 (Personal Communication).

  14. F. Etzweiler, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. & Chromatogr. Commun.7, 578 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. G. A. Junk, J. J. Richard, M. D. Grieser, D. Witiak, J. L. Witiak, M. D. Argiello, R. Vick, H. J. Svec, J. S. Fritz, G. V. Calder, J. Chromatogr.99, 754 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Pretorius, K. Lawson, W. Bertsch, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. & Chromatogr. Commun.6, 419 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Roeraade, S. Blomberg, to be submitted for publication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blomberg, S., Roeraade, J. An evaluation and comparison of micro-techniques for concentration of volatile components from dilute solutions. Chromatographia 25, 21–24 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02311522

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02311522

Key Words

Navigation