Abstract
ON reading a review of my recently-published work, “The Beginnings of Life,” in the last number of the Academy, written by Mr. H. N. Moseley, I could not help feeling considerable surprise at many of the statements which it contained. That such apparent ignorance of the facts should have been shown, and that such an inadequate statement of the case should have been made by a distinguished pupil of Prof. Rolleston, I was not prepared to expect. My first resolution was to pay as little attention to the statements of the reviewer as they seemed to deserve. It has, however, been strongly represented to me by friends whose opinion I value that some of the statements ought not to be allowed to pass without comment or contradiction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BASTIAN, H. The Beginnings of Life. Nature 7, 26–27 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/007026c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/007026c0
This article is cited by
-
On the history of the statistical method in biology
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (1980)
-
Lord Lister 1
Nature (1913)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.