Skip to main content
Log in

Insect behavior at the leaf surface and learning as aspects of host plant selection

  • Multi-Author Review
  • Insect Chemical Ecology
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Direct observations on the feeding behavior of insect herbivores are uncommon, but important. The important aspects of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects that have been revealed by such observations are the role of chemicals in the leaf surface, and learning. There are few detailed reports of behavior at the leaf surface, but these indicate that many, if not all, insects exhibit behavior pattenrs that can be interpreted as an examination of the quality of the surface and acceptance or rejection may follow without further testing. A number of experiments show that chemicals from the leaf surface commonly contribute to the acceptability or otherwise of a plant and in most cases so far the active chemicals are of widespread occurrence, not having a specific association with the host plant. Some experiments show that the association between surface chemicals and plant palatability is learned, but in other cases there is evidence of an innate response. Habituation to deterrent chemicals has been demonstrated in the laboratory, but not in the field. Food aversion learning also occurs and may be important in dietary switching by polyphagous insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkin, D. S. J., and Hamilton, R. J., The changes with age in the epicuticular wax ofSorghum bicolor. J. nat. Prod.45 (1982) 697–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernays, E. A., and Chapman, R. F., Experiments to determine the basis of food selection byChorthipus parallelus (Zetterstedt) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the field. J. Anim. Ecol.39 (1970) 761–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernays, E. A., and Chapman, R. F., The importance of chemical inhibition of feeding in host-plant selection byChorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt). Acrida4 (1975) 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernays, E. A., and Lee, J. C., Food aversion learning in the polyphagous grasshopperSchistocerca americana. Physiol. Ent.13 (1988) 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernays, E. A., and Lewis, A. C., The effect of wilting on palatability of plants toSchistocerca gregaria Oecologia70 (1986) 132–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernays, E. A., Blaney, W. M., Chapman, R. F., and Cook, A. G., The ability ofLocusta migratoria L. to perceive plant surface waxes. Symp. Biol. Hung.16 (1976) 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernays, E. A., Chapman, R. F., MacDonald, J., and Salter, J. W. R., The degree of oligophagy inLocusta migratoria (L.). Ecol. Ent.1 (1976) 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernays, E. A., Woodhead, S., and Haines, L., Climbing by newly hatched larvae of the spotted stalk borerChilo partellus to the top of sorghum plants. Ent. exp. appl.39 (1985) 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blaney, W. M., and Chapman, R. F., The function of the maxillary palps of Acrididae (Orthoptera). Ent. exp. appl.13 (1970) 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blaney, W. M. and Simmonds, M. S. J., Food selection by locusts: the role of learning in rejection behaviour. Ent. exp. appl.39 (1985) 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blaney, W. M., and Simmonds, M. S. J., Learning in larval food selection: the role of plant surfaces, in: Insects and the Plant Surface, pp. 342–344. Eds, B. Juniper and R. Southwood. Edward Arnold, London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blaney, W. M., and Simmonds, M. S. J., Experience: a modifier of neural and behavioural sensitivity in: Insects-Plants Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Plant-Insect Relationships,. pp. 237–241. Eds, V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres and D. Lachaise, Junk, Dordrecht 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blaney, W. M., and Winstanley, C., Food selection behaviour inLocusta migratoria, in: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 365–366. Eds J. H. Visser and A. K. Minks. Pudoc, Wageningen 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blaney, W. M., Winstanley, C., and Simmonds, M. S. J., Food selection by locusts: an analysis of rejection behaviour. Ent. exp. appl.38 (1985) 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boer, G. de, and Hanson, F. E., Differentiation of roles of chemosensory organs in food discrimination among host and non-host plants by larvae of the tobacco hornworm,Manduca sexta. Physiol. Ent.12, (1987) 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boer, G. de, and Hanson, F. E., Role of leaf lipids in food selection by larvae of the tobacco hornworm,Manduca sexta.J. chem. Ecol. 14 (1988) 669–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman, R. F., Observations on the feeding of the red locust (Nomadacris septemfasciata) (Serville). Br. J. Anim. Behav.5 (1957) 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman, R. F., The role of the leaf surface in food selection by acridids and other insects. Colloq. Int. CNRS265 (1977) 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chapman, R. F., Bernays, E. A., and Wyatt, T., Chemical aspects of host-plant specificity in threeLarrea-feeding grasshoppers. J. chem. Ecol.14 (1988) 561–579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook, A. G., Woodhead, S., Magalit, V. F., and Heinrichs, E. A., Variation in feeding behaviour ofNilaparvata lugens on resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Ent. exp. appl.43 (1987) 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Delaney, K., and Gelperin, A., Post-ingestive food-aversion learning to amino acid deficient diets by the terrestrial slugLimax maximus. J. comp. Physiol. A159 (1986) 281–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dethier, V. G., Food aversion-learning in two polyphagous caterpillars,Diacrisia virginica andEstigmene congrua. Physiol. Ent.5 (1980) 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dethier, V. G., Induction and aversion-learning in polyphagous arctiid larvae (Lepidoptera) in an ecological setting. Can. Ent.120 (1988) 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dethier, V. G., and Yost, M. T., Oligophagy and the absence of foodaversion learning in tobacco hornworms,Manduca sexta. Physiol. Ent.4 (1979) 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gill, J. S., Studies on insect feeding deterrents with special reference to the fruit extracts of the neem tree,Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London 1972.

  26. Greenway, A. R., Griffiths, D. C., and Lloyd, S., Response ofMyzus persicae to components of aphid extracts and to carboxylic acids. Ent. exp. appl.24 (1978) 369–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrison, G. D., Host-plant discrimination and evolution of feeding preference in the Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Physiol. Ent.12 (1987) 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrison, G. D., and Mitchell, B. K., Host-plant acceptance by geographic populations of the Colorado potato beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Role of solanaceous alkaloids as sensory deterrents. J. chem. Ecol.14 (1988) 777–788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsiao, T. H., Chemical influence on feeding behavior ofLeptinotarsa beetles, in: Experimental Analysis of Insect Behaviour, pp. 237–248. Ed. L. Barton Browne. Springer, Berlin 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Jermy, T., The role of experience in the host selection of phytophagous insects, in: Perspectives in Chemoreception and Behavior, pp. 143–157. Eds R. F. Chapman, E. A. Bernays and J. G. Stoffolano. Springer, New York 1987.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Jermy, T., Bernays, E. A., and Szentesi, A., The effect of repeated exposure to feeding deterrents on their acceptability to phytophagous insects, in: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 25–32. Eds. J. H. Visser and A. K. Minks. Pudoc, Wageningen 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jermy, T., Horvath, J., and Szentesi, A., The role of habituation in food selection of lepidopterous larvae: the example ofMamestra brassicae L. (Lepid. Noctuidae), in: Insects-Plants: Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 231–236. Eds V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres and D. Lachaise. Junk, Dordrecht 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jordens-Rottger, v. D., Das Verhalten der Schwarzen Bohnenblattlaus,Aphis fabae Scop. gegenüber chemischen Reizen von Pflanzenoberflächen. Z. angew. Ent.88 (1979) 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Juniper, B., and Southwood, R., Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Klingauf, F., Die Wirkung des Glucosids Pholorizin auf das Wirtswahlverhalten vonRhopalosiphum insertum (Wald.) undAphis pomi de Geer (Homoptera: Aphididae). Z. angew. Ent.68 (1971) 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Klingauf, F., Nocker-Wenzel, K., and Klein, W., Einfluß einiger Wachskomponenten vonVicia faba L. auf das Wirtswahlverhalten vonAcyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenschutz78 (1971) 641–648.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klingauf, F., Nocker-Wenzel, K., and Rottger, U., Die Rolle peripherer Pflanzenwachse für den Befall durch phytophage Insekten. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenschutz85 (1978) 228–237.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, J. C., and Bernays, E. A., Decline in acceptability of a food forSchistocerca americana: the role of food aversion learning. Physiol. Ent.13 (1988) 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ma, W.-C., Dynamics of feeding responses inPieris brassicae Linn. as a function of chemosensory input: a behavioral, ultrastructural and electrophysiological study. Meded. Landbouwhog. Wageningen72 (1972) 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Maloney, P. J., Albert, P. J., and Tulloch, A. P., Influence of epicuticular waxes from white spruce and balsam fir on feeding behavior of the Eastern spruce budworm. J. Insect Behav.1 (1988) 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McKibben, G. H., Thompson, M. J., Parrott, W. L., Thompson, A. C., and Lusby, W. R., Identification of feeding stimulants for boll weevils from cotton buds and anthers. J. chem. Ecol.11 (1985) 1229–1239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miles, P. W., The saliva of Hemiptera. Adv. Insect Physiol.9 (1972) 183–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mori, M., n-Hexacosanol and n-octacosanol; feeding stimulants for larvae of the silkworm,Bombyx mori. J. Insect Physiol.28 (1982) 969–973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Papaj, D., and Prokopy, R., Learning in phytophagous insects. A. Rev. Ent. (1989) in press.

  45. Phelan, P. L., and Miller, J. R., Post-landing behaviour of alateMyzus persicae as altered by (E)-beta-farnesene and three carboxylic acids. Ent. exp. appl.32 (1982) 46–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Raffa, K. F., Maintenance of innate feeding preferences by a polyphagous insect despite ingestion of applied deleterious chemicals. Ent. exp. appl.44 (1987) 221–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Raffa, K. F., and Frazier, J. L., A generalized model for quantifying behavioral de-sensitization to antifeedants. Ent. exp. appl.46 (1988) 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rhoades, D. F., The antiherbivore chemistry ofLarrea, creosote bush, in: Biology and Chemistry ofLarrea in New World Deserts, pp. 135–175. Eds. T. J. Mabry, J. H. Hunziker and D. R. DiFeo. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross Inc., Pennsylvania 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Simpson, S. J., Simmonds, M. S. J., and Blaney, W. M., A comparison of dietary selection behaviour in larvalLocusta migratoria andSpodoptera littoralis. Physiol. Ent.13 (1988) 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Szentesi, A., and Bernays, E. A., A study of behavioural habituation to a feeding deterrent in nymphs ofSchistocerca gregaria. Physiol. Ent.9 (1984) 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Traynier, R. M. M., and Hines, E. R., Probes by aphids indicated by stain induced fluorescence in leaves. Ent. exp. appl.45 (1987) 198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Usher, B., Bernays, E. A., and Barbehenn, R. V., Tests with antifeedants forPseudaletia unipuncta: variation over time. Ent. exp. appl. (1988) in press.

  53. Waldbauer, G. P., Cohen, R. W., and Friedman, S., Self-selection of an optimal nutrient mix from defined diets by larvae of the corn earwormHeliothis zea Boddie. Physiol. Zool.47 (1984) 590–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Walker, G. P., Probing and oviposition behavior of the bayberry whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on young and mature lemon leaves. Annls ent. Soc. Am.80 (1987) 524–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Walker, G. P., The role of leaf cuticle in leaf age preference by bayberry whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on lemon. Annls ent. Soc. Am.81 (1988) 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Woodhead, S., Leaf surface chemicals of seedling sorghum and resistance toLocusta migratoria, in: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 375–376. Eds J. H. Visser and A. K. Minks. Pudoc, Wageningen 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Woodhead, S., Surface chemistry ofSorghum bicolor and its importance in feeding byLocusta migratoria. Physiol. Ent.8 (1983) 345–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Woodhead, S., The influence of surface chemicals of sorghum on the behaviour of the stemborerChilo partellus (Swinhoe), in: Insects-Plants: Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Insect-Plant Relationships, p. 425. Eds V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres and D. Lachaise. Junk, Dordrecht 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Woodhead, S., and Chapman, R. F., Insect behaviiour and the chemistry of plant surface waxes, in: Insects and the Plant Surface, pp. 123–136. Eds B. Juniper and R. Southwood, Edward Arnold, London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Woodheald, S., and Padgham, D., The effect of plant surface characteristics on resistance of rise to the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens. Ent. exp. appl.47 (1988) 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, R.F., Bernays, E.A. Insect behavior at the leaf surface and learning as aspects of host plant selection. Experientia 45, 215–222 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951806

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951806

Key words

Navigation