Abstract
Water and cation budgets were calculated for two sub-basins within a small low relief watershed in South-Central Ontario during a period of ephemeral runoff which was initiated by spring snow melt. The hydrology of one (upland) sub-basin was strongly influenced by seasonal fluctuations in the level of regional ground water. Saturated contributing areas formed in low lying regions adjacent to the stream channel where the water table rose to the surface, and stream discharge was a mixture of ground water and saturation overland flow. In the second sub-basin a wetland provided a large and spatially less variable saturated contributing area. Clay soils underlying the wetland resulted in a shallow perched water table, poorly drained and highly organic soils, and greatly reduced inputs of regional ground water. Stream discharge was largely the result of surface runoff from the wetland and adjacent areas of saturated soil.
Inter-basin variations in water export were by far greater than variations in stream chemistry. As a result, inter-basin variations in cation export strongly reflected variations in water export over the time interval in which the majority of a given ion was lost from the watershed. Spatial differences in water export were least at the onset of runoff when basin saturation was greatest and overland flow made large contributions to the discharge from both sub-basins. Potassium and hydrogen had high concentrations at this time which caused these ions to show only small spatial differences in export. With decreases in the areal extent of soil saturation, and increases in the storage capacity of the wetland, the hydrologic contrast between sub-basins increased. Greater water loss from the upland area resulted from a greater discharge of regional ground water, and a more rapid expansion of the saturated contributing areas during storm events. Calcium, magnesium, and sodium concentrations increased steadily during the first 3 weeks of runoff, so that the peak export of these cations occurred later in the runoff period at times of higher concentration, but lower and spatially more variable discharges. Consequently, spatial differences in the loss of these ions was great and favoured the upland sub-basin, since the majority of export occurred when the hydrologic contrast between sub-basins was largest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, W. P., 1978. The climatological record of Peterborough Ontario. Occasional Paper no. 6. Dept. of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough Ontario.
American Public Health Association (APHA), 1975. Standard Methods For The Examination of Water and Wastewater. 14th Ed. APHA Washington, D. C.
Attiwill, P. M., 1968. The loss of elements from decomposing litter. Ecology 49:142–145.
Beven, K. and P. Germann, 1982. Macropores and water flow in soil. Water Resour. Res. 18:1311–1325.
Buckman, H. O. and N. C. Brady, 1971. The nature and properties of soils Macmillan, New York.
Doyle, G., 1983. Stratigraphic investigations in the Telford Basin. Unpubl. B. Sc. Thesis. Dept. of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough Ontario.
Driscoll, C. T., B. J. Wyskowski, C. C. Cosentini and M. E. Smith, 1987. Processes regulating temporal and longitudinal variations in the chemistry of a low-order woodland stream in the Adirondack region of New York. Biogeochemistry 3:225–241.
Dunne, T., 1978. Field studies of hillslope flow processes. In M. J. Kirby (ed.) Hillslope Hydrology. Wiley pp. 227–293.
Dunne, T., T. R. Moore and C. H. Taylor, 1975. Recognition and prediction of runoff producing zones in humid regions Hydrological Sciences Bulletin. 20:305–327.
Gardner, W. H., 1965. Water Content. In C.A. Black et al. (eds.) Methods of soil Analysis V. 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 82–125.
Gorham, E., 1957. The development of peat lands. Q. Rev. Biol. 32:145–166.
Gosz, J. R., G. E. Likens and F. H. Bormann, 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, Hew Hampshire. Ecol. Mongr. 43:173–191.
Hesse, P. R., 1971. A textbook of soil chemical analysis. John Murray Ltd., London.
Hewlett, J. D. and A. R. Hibbert, 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. In W. E. Sooper and H. W. Lull (eds.) Forest Hydrology, Pergamon pp. 275–290.
Hodkinson, I. D., 1975. Dry weight losses and chemical changes in vascular plant litter of terrestrial origin occurring in a beaver pond ecosystem. J. Ecol. 63:131–142.
Jackson, M. L., 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Lawrence, G. B., C. T. Driscoll and R. D. Fuller, 1988. Hydrologic control of aluminium chemistry in and acidic headwater stream. Water Resour. Res. 24:659–669.
Likens, G. E., F. H. Bormann, R. S. Pierce, J. S. Eaton and N. M. Johnson, 1977. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 146 pp.
McAvoy, D. C., 1989. Episodic response of aluminium chemistry in an acid sensitive Massachusetts catchment. Water Resour. Res. 25:233–240.
Metson, A. J., 1956. Methods of chemical analysis of soil survey samples. Soil bureau bulletin 12, New Zealand Dept. of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mulholland, P.J., G. V. Wilson and P.M. Jardine, 1990. Hydrogeochemical response of a forested watershed to storms: effects of preferential flow along shallow and deep pathways. Water Resour. Res. 26:3021–3036.
Peech, M., 1965. Hydrogen Ion activity. In C. A. Black et al. (eds.) Methods of soil Analysis V. 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 914–926.
Pierson, D. C., 1983. The role of hydrologic and chemical processes in determining ion export from a low relief wetland watershed. Unpubl. M. Sc. Thesis Dept. of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. 211 pp.
Pierson, D. C. and C. H. Taylor, 1983. Comparative differences in the chemistry of snow pack and bulk precipitation samples collected as snow and rain. Proceedings Eastern Snow Conf. 28:92–101.
Pierson, D. C. and C. H. Taylor, 1985. Influence of snowcover development and ground freezing on cation loss from a wetland watershed during spring runoff. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42:1979–1985.
Roberge, J. and A. P. Plamondon, 1987. Snow melt runoff pathways in a boreal forest hillslope, the role of macropore flow. J. Hydrol. 95:39–54.
Sklash, M. G. and R. N. Farvolden, 1979. The role of ground water in storm runoff. J. Hydrol. 43:45–65.
Sklash, M. G., M. K. Stewart and A. G. Pearce, 1986. Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments, 2. A case of hillslope and low-order stream response. Water Resour. Res. 22:1273–1282.
Swistock, B. R., D. R. DeWalle and W. E. Sharpe, 1989. Sources of acidic storm flow in an Appalachian headwater stream. Water Resour. Res. 25:2139–2147.
Taylor, C. H., 1982. The effect on storm runoff response of seasonal variations in contributing zone in small watersheds. Nordic Hydrology 13:165–182.
Tayor, C. H. and D. C. Pierson, 1985. The effect of a small wetland on runoff response during spring snow melt. Atmosphere-Ocean 23:137–154.
Wiklander, L., 1964. Cation and anion exchange phenomena. In F. E. Bear (ed.) Chemistry of the soil. Reinhold Pulb. Corp. New York pp. 163–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierson, D.C., Taylor, C.H. The role of surface and sub-surface runoff processes in controlling cation export from a wetland watershed. Aquatic Science 56, 80–96 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877437