Skip to main content
Log in

Nocturnal orientation in the black carpenter antCamponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The black carpenter antCamponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer), a predominantly nocturnal Formicine ant, responds to a hierarchy of visual and tactile cues when orienting along odor trails at night. Under illumination from moonlight or artificial light, workers rely upon these beacons to mediate phototactic orientation. In the absence of moonlight or artificial lights, ants were able to orient visually to terrestrial landmarks. In the absence of all landmarks, save for overhanging tree branches, ants could negotiate shortcuts or make directional changes in response to visual landmarks presented within the tree canopy on a moonless night. When experimental manipulations placed the ants in total darkness, they could no longer negotiate shortcuts and would resort to thigmotactic orientation along structural guidelines to reach a food source. The hierachical organization of these diverse cues in a foraging strategy is discussed, as well as their adaptive significance toC. pennsyhanicus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beugnon, G. and V. Fourcassie, 1988. How do red wood ants orient during diurnal and nocturnal foraging in a three dimensional system? II. Field experiments.Ins. Soc. 35:106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T. S., Dillmann, E., Giger, A. and Wehner, R., 1992. Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants.J. Comp. Physiol. (A) 170:435–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, C. T. and D. L. Wood, 1980. Orientation to trails by a carpenter ant,Camponotus modoc (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in a giant sequoia forest.Can. Entomol. 122:993–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn, G. T. and M. Kruk-De Bruin, 1972. The dirunal rhythm in a population ofFormica polyctena Furst.Ekologia Polska 20:117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli, P., 1972. The relation of astromenotactic and anemomenotactic orientation mechanisms in desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor (Formicidae: Hymenoptera). In:Information Processing in the Visual Systems of Arthropods, (R. Wehner, Ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcassie, V., 1991. Landmark orientation in natural situations in the red wood antFormica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3:89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H. G. and R. B. Roberts, 1980. Foraging behavior of the carpenter ant,Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in New Jersey.J. Kan. Entomol. Soc. 53:295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, E. B., W. E. Friend, and C. E. Atwood, 1977. Trail-laying behavior of the carpenter ant,Camponotus pennsylvanicus.Can. Entomol. 109:129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. and D. A. Wolfe, 1973.Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 503 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., 1980. Canopy orientation: a new kind of orientation in ants.Science 210:86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. and R. W. Taylor, 1983. A behavioral study of the primitive antNothomyrmecia macrops Clark.Ins. Soc. 30:384–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1990.The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, 732 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander, R., 1957. Die optische Richtungsorientierung der Roten Waldameise (Formica rufa L.).Z. Vergl. Physiol. 40:162–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, R. M. and G. A. Kopteva, 1982. Night orientation of antsFormica rufa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) upon movement on routes.Zoologichesky Zhurnal 61:1351–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, J. H., 1984. Diel differences in foraging in two ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 57:111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, J. H., 1985. Crest-line orientation inCamponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer).Ins. Soc. 32:305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, J. H., 1986. Topographic orientation in two species of ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 34:236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, J. H. and B. L. Reid, 1992. The use of spatial cues for structural guideline orientation inTapinoma sessile andCamponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Ins. Behav. 5:71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, P. S. and B. Hölldobler, 1989. Orientation and communication in the neotropical antOdontomachus bauri Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Ponerinae).Ethology 83:154–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricer, J. L., 1908. The life history of the carpenter ant.Biol. Bull. 14:177–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R., 1971. Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behavior in foraging wood ants of the genusFormica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Acta Zoologica Fennica 133:1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R., 1977a. Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). I: Age polyethism and topographic traditions.Acta Zoologica Fennica 149:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R., 1977b. Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II: Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity.Acta Zoologica Fennica 150:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santschi, F., 1923. L'orientation sidérale des fourmis, et quelque considérations sur leurs différentes possibilitites d'orientation.Memoires de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 1:137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1990.SAS Procedures Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoff, H., and K. Lawson, 1979. Orientation of the army antNeivamyrmex nigrescens: integration of chemical and tactile information.Anim. Behav. 27:429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello, J. F. A., 1977. Recruitment behavior, orientation, and the organization of foraging in the carpenter antCamponotus pennsylvanicus DeGeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2:61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R., 1972. Visual orientation performances of desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor, towards astromenotactic directions and horizon landmarks. In:Proceedings AIBS Symposium Animal Orientation and Navigation (S. Galler et al., Eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R. and P. Duelli, 1971. The spatial orientation of desert antsCataglyphis bicolor, before sunrise and after sunset.Experientia 27:1364–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R. and I. Flatt, 1972. The visual orientation of desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor, by means of terrestrial cues. In:Information Processing in the Visual Systems of Arthropods (R. Wehner, Ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R. and F. Raber, 1979. Visual spatial memory in desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Experientia 35:1569–1571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R., R. Harkness, and P. Schmid-Hempel, 1983. Foraging strategies in individually searching antsCataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In:Information Processing in Animals, vol. 1 (M. Lindauer, Ed.). Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, 79 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klotz, J.H., Reid, B.L. Nocturnal orientation in the black carpenter antCamponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ins. Soc 40, 95–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338835

Key words

Navigation