Skip to main content
Log in

Defect resistance as a measure of the resistance of steels containing stress raisers to brittle fracture

  • Scientific-Technical Section
  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Fundamental mechanical characteristics of steel — resistance to microcleavage Rmc and the ductility coefficient Kd=Rmc/σ t − together with certain standard mechanical characteristics make it possible to determine the physically substantiated defect-resistance parameter of the steel D2=log Kd-nt.

  2. 2.

    The defect-resistance parameter D2, when compared with the logarithm of the “severity” of the expected defect log Jo, makes it possible to determine the suitability of the chosen steel for use under given conditions if D2>log jo.

  3. 3.

    At D2>log jo, the greatest nominal stress in the product can safely be near the yield point. Otherwise, the service loads should be reduced in accordance with the value of D2.

  4. 4.

    In the case of uniformly distributed tensile stresses, small concentrators do not endanger the load-carrying capacity of mechanical elements even for very low values of residual ductility (D2≈0.1) if the nominal loads have not reached the yield, point any-where in the material.

  5. 5.

    Small defects in steels present a real danger only in structural elements having zones with nonuniformly distributed stresses (at recesses and fillets and in the outermost fibers of bent elements). Assuming that the steel is not sufficiently ductile, small defects can be active sources of fracture in a structure only in those zones where a moderate amount (about 2% or more) of plastic strain has occurred locally. The criterion of adequate ductility in the steel is the relation D2>log j.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Yu. Ya. Meshkov, Physical Principles of the Fracture of Metal Structures [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. Ya. Meshkov, G. A. Pakharenko, and T. N. Serditova, “Relationship between stresses associated with brittle strength and resistance to ductile fracture in the uniaxial tension of low-carbon steel,” Metallofizika,5, No. 4, 61–64 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. N. Serditova, “Study of the critical fracture stress of steel in uniaxial tension,” Brittle-Fracture Resistance and Strength of Metals, [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Uzhik, Brittle-Fracture Resistance and Strength of Metals [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. A. Kopel'man, Resistance of Welded Elements to Brittle Fracture [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute of Metal Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev. Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No, 5, pp. 75–80, May, 1986.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zlenko, G.P., Mettus, G.S., Meshkov, Y.Y. et al. Defect resistance as a measure of the resistance of steels containing stress raisers to brittle fracture. Strength Mater 18, 653–659 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01522780

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01522780

Keywords

Navigation