Skip to main content
Log in

Subgrid-modelling in LES of compressible flow

  • Published:
Applied Scientific Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subgrid-models for Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of compressible turbulent flow are tested for the three-dimensional mixing layer. For the turbulent stress tensor the recently developed dynamic mixed model yields reasonable results.A priori estimates of the subgrid-terms in the filtered energy equation show that the usually neglected pressure-dilatation and turbulent dissipation rate are as large as the commonly retained pressure-velocity subgrid-term. Models for all these terms are proposed: a similarity model for the pressure-dilatation, similarity andk-dependent models for the turbulent dissipation rate and a dynamic mixed model for the pressure-velocity subgrid-term. Actual LES demonstrates that for a low Mach number all subgrid-terms in the energy equation can be neglected, while for a moderate Mach number the effect of the modelled turbulent dissipation rate is larger than the combined effect of the other modelled subgrid-terms in the filtered energy equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rogallo, R.S. and Moin, P., Numerical simulation of turbulent flows.Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16 (1984) 99–137.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Germano, M., Turbulence: the filtering approach.J. Fluid Mech. 238 (1992) 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bardina, J., Ferziger, J.H. and Reynolds, W.C., Improved turbulence models based on LES of homogeneous incompressible turbulent flows. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Report No. TF-19, Stanford (1984).

  4. Zang, Y., Street, R.L. and Koseff, J.R., A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows.Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 3186–3196.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshizawa, Y., Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows, with the application to subgrid modelling.Phys. Fluids 29 (1986) 2152–2164.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M.Y., Speziale, C.G. and Zang, T.A., Toward the Large-Eddy Simulation of compressible turbulent flows.J. Fluid Mech. 238 (1992) 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moin, P., Squires, K., Cabot, W. and Lee, S., A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport.Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 2746–2757.

    Google Scholar 

  8. El-Hady, N.M., Zang, T.A. and Piomelli, U., Dynamic subgrid-scale modelling for high-speed transitional boundary layers.ASME Fed-Vol. 162 (1993) 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blaisdell, G.A., Mansour, N.N. and Reynolds, W.C., Compressibility effects on the growth and structure of homogeneous turbulent shear flow.J. Fluid Mech. 256 (1993) 443–485.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zeman, O., On the decay of compressible isotropic turbulence.Phys. Fluids A 3 (1991) 951–955.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarkar, S., Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M.Y. and Kreiss, H.O., The analysis and modelling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence.J. Fluid Mech. 227 (1991) 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geurts, B., Vreman, B., Kuerten, H. and Theofilis, V., LES modelling errors in free and wall-bounded compressible shear layers. In: Rodi, W. and Martelli, F. (eds),Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1993) pp. 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meneveau, C., Statistics of turbulence subgrid-scale stresses: Necessary conditions and experimental tests.Phys. Fluids 6 (1994) 815–833.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds, W.C., The potential and limitations of direct and large eddy simulations. In: Lumley, J.L. (ed.),Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at Crossroads. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1990) p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ragab, S.A. and Wu, J.L., Linear instabilities in two-dimensional compressible mixing layers.Phys. Fluids A 1 (1989) 957–966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sandham, N.D. and Reynolds, W.C., Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer.J. Fluid Mech. 224 (1991) 133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Comte, P., Lesieur, M. and Lamballais, E., Large and small-scale stirring of vorticity and a passive scalar in a 3D temporal mixing layer.Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 2761–2778.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuerten, J.G.M., Numerical definition document for the ISNaS time-explicit flow solver. Memorandum No. 934, University of Twente (1991).

  19. Moser, R.D. and Rogers, M., The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: Pairing and transition to turbulence.J. Fluid Mech. 247 (1993) 275–320.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, S., Meneveau, C. and Katz, J., Experimental study of similarity subgrid-scale models of turbulence in the far-field of a jet. In: Voke, P.R., Kleiser, L. and Chollet, J.P. (eds),Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994) pp. 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schumann, U., Modelling of Reynolds-stress turbulence models.Phys. Fluids 20 (1977) 721–725.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vreman, B., Geurts, B. and Kuerten, H., Realizability conditions for the turbulent stress tensor in large-eddy simulation.J. Fluid Mech. 278 (1994) 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vreman, B., Geurts, B. and Kuerten, H., On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model.Phys. Fluids 6 (1994) 4057–4059.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, V.C., A proposed statistical-dynamic closure method for the linear or nonlinear subgrid-scale stresses.Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 1080–1082.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vreman, B., Geurts, B. & Kuerten, H. Subgrid-modelling in LES of compressible flow. Appl. Sci. Res. 54, 191–203 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849116

Key words

Navigation