Skip to main content
Log in

Induced and spontaneous abortion in relation to risk of breast cancer (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relation of induced and spontaneous abortion to the risk of breast cancer is evaluated in a hospital-based case-control interview study conducted in three cities in the United States from 1985 through 1995. Cases were 1,803 women aged 25 to 64 years with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer; controls were 4,182 women of the same ages admitted for conditions unrelated to reproductive factors. Other breast cancer risk-factors were controlled through multiple logistic regression. The reference for allanalyses was women who had never had an abortion, either induced or spontaneous. Among parous women, the relative risk (RR) estimate was 1.1 (95percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.9-1.5) for induced abortion overall, 1.0(CI = 0.7-1.4) for abortion before the first birth, and 1.3 (CI = 1.0-1.8)for abortion after at least one birth. Among nulliparous women, the relative risk estimate for induced abortion was 1.3 (CI = 0.9-1.9). There was no trend of increased risk with number of abortions, nor was there consistent evidence of an increased risk in any particular subgroup. Spontaneous abortion was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer, either among nulliparous women or among parous women. These findings provide little support for the hypothesis that induced abortion increases breast cancer risk overall or in particular subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, John EM. Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev1993; 15: 36–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruzzi P, Negri E, La Vecchia C, et al. Short term increase in risk of breast cancer after full term pregnancy. Br Med J1988; 297: 1096–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams EMI, Jones L, Vessey MP, McPherson K. Short term increase in risk of breast cancer associated with full pregnancy. Br Med J1990; 300: 578–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsieh C-c, Pavia M, Lambe M, et al. Dual effect of parity on breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer1994; 30A: 969–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambe M, Hsieh C-c, Trichopoulos D, Ekbom A, Pavia M, Adami HO. Transient increase in the risk of breast cancer after giving birth. N Engl J Med1994; 331: 5–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosner B, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Reproductive risk factors in a prospective study of breast cancer: the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol1994; 139: 819–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol1980; 100: 497–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo J, Wilgus G, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. I. Differentiation of the mammary gland as determinant of tumor incidence and type of lesion. Am J Pathol1979; 96: 721–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Russo J, Rivera R, Russo IH. Influence of age and parity on the development of the human breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat1992; 23: 211–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Michels KB, Willett WC. Does induced or spontaneous abortion affect the risk of breast cancer? Epidemiology1996; 7: 521–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinton LA, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF Jr. Reproductive factors in the aetiology of breast cancer. Br J Cancer1983; 47: 757–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Le MG, Bachelot A, Doyon F, Kramar A, Hill C. Oral contraceptive use and breast or cervical cancer: preliminary results of a French case-control study. In: Wolff JP, Scott JS, eds. Hormones and Sexual Factors in Human Cancer Aetiology. New York, NY (USA): Elsevier, 1984: 139–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hirohata T, Shigematsu T, Nomura AMY, Nomura Y, Horie A, Hirohata I. Occurrence of breast cancer in relation to diet and reproductive history: a case-control study in Fukuoka, Japan. NCI Monogr1985; 69: 187–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ewertz M, Duffy SW. Risk of breast cancer in relation to reproductive factors in Denmark. Br J Cancer1988; 58: 99–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindefors-Harris BM, Eklund G, Meirik O, Rutqvist LE, Wiklund K. Risk of cancer of the breast after legal abortion during first trimester: a Swedish register study. Br Med J1989; 299: 1430–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Howe HL, Senie RT, Bzduch H, Herzfeld P. Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40. Int J Epidemiol1989; 18: 300–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Lund E, Meirik O. Absence of association between reproductive variables and the risk of breast cancer in young women in Sweden and Norway. Br J Cancer1990; 62: 122–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernstein L, Pike MC, Krailo M, Henderson BE. Update of the Los Angeles study of oral contraceptives and breast cancer: 1981 and 1983. In: Mann RD, ed. Oral Contraceptives and Breast Cancer: The Implications of the Present Findings for Informed Consent and Informed Choice. Park Ridge, NJ (USA): Parthenon Publishing Group, 1990: 169–81.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parazzini F, La Vecchia C. Spontaneous and induced abortions and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer1991; 48: 816–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Bocciolone L. Menstrual and reproductive factors and breast cancer in women with family history of the disease. Int J Cancer1992; 51: 677–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Laing AE, Demenais FM, Williams R, Kissling G, Chen VW, Bonney GE. Breast cancer risk factors in African-American women: the Howard University Tumor Registry experience. J Natl Med Assoc1993; 85: 931–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrieu N, Clavel F, Gairard B, et al. Familial risk of breast cancer and abortion. Cancer Detect Prev1994; 18: 51–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Daling JR, Malone KE, Voigt LF, White E, Weiss NS. Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion. JNCI1994; 86: 1584–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lipworth L, Katsouyanni K, Ekbom A, Michels KB, Trichopoulos D. Abortion and the risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Greece. Int J Cancer1995; 61: 181–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Longnecker MP, Mittendorf R, Greenberg ER, Willett WC. Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA1996; 275: 283–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Daling JR, Brinton LA, Voigt LF, et al. Risk of breast cancer among white women following induced abortion. Am J Epidemiol1996; 144: 373–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan JM, Yu MC, Ross RK, Gao YI, Henderson B. Risk factors for breast cancer in Chinese women in Shanghai. Cancer Res1988; 48: 1949–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE. Induced abortion and risk of breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. JNCI1996; 88: 1759–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Olsen JH, et al. Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med1997; 336: 81–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Kaufman DW, Strom BL, Schottenfeld D, Shapiro S. Breast cancer in relation to the occurrence and time of induced and spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol1988; 127: 981–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pike MC, Henderson BE, Casagrande JT, et al. Oral contraceptive use and early abortion as risk factors for breast cancer in young women. Br J Cancer1981; 43: 72–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Slone D, Shapiro S, Miettinen OS. Case-control surveillance of serious illnesses attributable to ambulatory drug use. In: Colombo F, Shapiro S, Slone D, et al, eds. Epidemiological Evaluation of Drugs. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier North-Holland Inc., 1977: 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. JNCI1959; 22: 719–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. New York, NY (USA): John Wiley 1971; 319–20.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wingo PA, Newsome K, Marks JS, Calle EE, Parker SL. The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous or induced abortion. Cancer Causes Control1997; 8: 93–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Abortion surveillance: preliminary data-United States, 1993. MMWR1996; 45: 235–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deutchman M. Advances in the diagnosis of first-trimester pregnancy problems. Am Fam Physician1991; 44(Suppl): 15S-30S.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Roman E, Stevenson AC. Spontaneous abortion. In: Barron SL, Thomson AM, eds. Obstetrical Epidemiology. London, UK: Academic Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jones EF, Forrest JD. Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988. Demography1992; 29: 113–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindefors-Harris BM, Eklund G, Adami HO, Meirik O. Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies. Am J Epidemiol1991; 134: 1003–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, J.R., Rosenberg, L., Rao, R.S. et al. Induced and spontaneous abortion in relation to risk of breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 8, 841–849 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018408211089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018408211089

Navigation