Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Condition of Agricultural Lands in Five Mid-Atlantic States

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indicators of the condition and sustainability of agricultural lands in five Mid-Atlantic states were measured in 1994. Indicators were selected to reflect crop productivity and land stewardship on annually harvested herbaceous crop (AHHC) land, which covers almost 10% of the land area in this region. Overall, condition of agricultural lands in the region is good. Crops generally yielded more than those grown in the 1980s, with a mean observed/expected yield index greater than 1. The mean soil quality index was slightly better than a "moderate" rating for crop growth. Almost 2/3 of the AHHC land is covered by crop rotation plans, with the remaining land mostly in hay fields. Insecticides were applied to less than 20% of AHHC land, and less than 20% of the land where pesticides were applied has high to moderately high potential for pesticides leaching into groundwater. However, integrated pest management (IPM) is practiced on less than 20% of AHHC land. Hay showed more efficient use of nitrogen than seed crops, and non-tilled sites, which are mostly hay, had more microbial biomass (suggesting more nutrient cycling) than tilled sites. This information could provide a baseline for a long-term monitoring program for agroecosystems in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bullock, D. G. 1992. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 11, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J. and Nealon, J.: 1987, Area Frame Design for Agricultural Surveys. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Research and Applications Division, Area Frame Section. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, T.: 1993, Natl. Geo. 185, 2–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, F. W. and Linthurst, R. A.: 1990, Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 28, 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, R. A., Weber, J. B. and Warren, R. L.: 1994. Protecting Groundwater in North Carolina — A Pesticide and Soil Ranking System. SoilFacts Series, AG-439-31. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC. 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. L., McNeal, B. L. and Cheng, H. H.: 1985. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (Committee on Long-Range Soil and Water Conservation, Board on Agriculture, National Research Council): 1993, Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS: 1981, Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 296, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS: 1992. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, Version 2.0. USDA-Soil Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellkamp, A.S., Shafer, S.R., Campbell, C.L. et al. Assessment of the Condition of Agricultural Lands in Five Mid-Atlantic States. Environ Monit Assess 51, 317–324 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005955807061

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005955807061

Keywords

Navigation