Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a control model for the Murray Mouth

  • Modeling
  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The River Murray in Australia drains an area of one million square kilometres, but in 1981 the mouth closed for some weeks. It is important that this be prevented, as the environmental consequences of permanent closure are severe. The size of the mouth is influenced by wind and wave activity at the mouth, and by the river flow, which is controlled by a system of weirs and barrages. We have been able to demonstrate using recursive estimation techniques that river flow is the most important explanatory variable for mouth size, so that the proper management of flow alone has the potential to prevent future closures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Close, in:The Impact of Man on the Natural Flow Regime, The Murray, Chapter 4, N. Mackay and D. Eastburn, eds., Murray Darling Basin Commission. Canberra, Australia, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Harvey, Coastal processes affecting management of the River Murray estuary, Australian Geographical Studies (1995, in press).

  3. H.G. Oliver and W.M. Anderson,The River Murray Barrages at Mundoo, Boundary Creek, Ewe Island and Tauwitchere Channels, Engineering and Water Supply Document, Adelaide, 1940.

  4. D.J. Walker, The role of river flows in the behaviour of the Murray Mouth, South Australian Geographical Journal (1990).

  5. D. Lucic, R. Frick, D. Benfield and R. Bourman, Modelling the Murray Mouth, Technical Report No. 1995/12, School of Mathematics, University of South Australia, 1995.

  6. G.M. Jenkins and D.G. Watts,Spectral Alaysis and its Applications, Holden-Day, 1968.

  7. G.E.P. Box and G.M. Jenkins,Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Academic Press, 1988.

  8. L. Ljung and T. Soderstrom,Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification, The MIT Press, 1983.

  9. D. Graupe,Identification of Systems, van Nostrand, 1972.

  10. R.A. Frick, R.P. Bourman, D. Lucic, D. Benfield, V. Nikulin, C. Elford, Modelling changes at the Murray Mouth,Proceedings of the Ocean and Atmosphere Pacific International Conference, Adelaide, 23–27 October, 1995 (in press). (Sponsored by the National Tidal Facility, Flinders University of South Australia.)

  11. R.P. Bourman and E.J. Barnett, Impacts of river regulation on the terminal lakes and mouth of the River Murray, South Australia, Australian Geographical Studies 33 (1995) 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.P. Bourman and N. Harvey, The Murray Mouth flood tidal delta, Australian Geographer 15 (1983) 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Edyvane and P. Carvalho,Proceedings of the Murray Mouth Biological Resources Assessment Workshop, South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frick, R.A., Bourman, R.P. & Lucic, D. Towards a control model for the Murray Mouth. Environ Model Assess 1, 37–44 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874845

Keywords

Navigation