Abstract
Individual, group, and ethnic differences in behavior have been an object of long, continuing, and contentious interest, both in the sciences and in popular culture. For well over 2,000 years, psychological traits, particularly those described as ‘intelligence’, have generally been considered the major factors in fitness in humans. After reviewing contemporary scientific thinking on intelligence, the psychometric methods used for the construction of psychological tests are presented and examined in the context of natural selection and metric characters. There are essential differences between the disciplines of genetics and psychology such that the concepts of the two are more divergent than might superficially appear to be the case. The analysis leads to the conclusion that standard psychometric methodology cannot yield tests appropriate for measurement of evolutionary fitness characters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle, 1910. The Works of Aristotle Translated into English: Historia Animalium, Vol. 4. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Aristotle, 1912. The Works of Aristotle Translated into English: De Partibus Animalium, De Motu and De Incessu Animalium, De Generatione Animalium, Vol. 5. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Binet, A. & T. Simon, 1905. Methodes nouvelle pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectual des anormaux. Année Psychol. 11: 191–244.
Binet, A. & T. Simon, 1908. La developpement de l'intelligence chez les enfants. Année Psychol. 14: 1–4.
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., P. Menozzi & A. Piazza, 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Davenport, J.W., W.W. Hagquist & G.R. Rankin, 1970. The symmetrical maze: An automated closed-field test series for rats. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. 2: 112–118.
Dunn, L.C., 1965. A Short History of Genetics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Falconer, D.S., 1983. An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York, 2nd edn.
Fisher, R.A., 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52: 399–433.
Fisher, R.A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Geber, M. & R.F. Dean, 1957. Gesell tests on African children. Pediatrics 20: 1055–1065.
Haeckel, E., 1910. The Evolution of Man, Vol. 1,2. Putnam, New York.
Haeckel, E., 1977. Last words on evolution. In Significant Contributions to the History of Psychology, 1750–1920, Vol. 3 of Series D. Comparative Psychology. Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Harrington, G.M., 1975. Intelligence tests may favor the majority groups in a population. Nature, Lond. 258: 708–709.
Harrington, G.M., 1981. The Har strains of rats: Origins and characteristics. Behav. Genet. 11: 445–468.
Harrington, G.M., 1988. Two forms of minority test bias as psychometric artifacts with an animal model. J. Comp. Psychol. 102: 400–407.
Hebb, D.O., 1958. A Textbook of Psychology. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Hebb, D.O. & K. Williams, 1946. A method of rating animal intelligence. J. Genet. Psychol. 34: 59–65.
Herrnstein, R.J. & C. Murray, 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press, New York.
Jensen, A.R., 1974. What is the question? what is the evidence? Vol. 2, pp. 203–244 in The Psychologists, edited by T.W. Krawiec. Oxford University Press, New York.
Jensen, A.R., 1980. Bias in Mental Testing. Free Press, New York.
Kempthorne, O., 1978. Logical, epistemological and statistical aspects of nature-nurture data interpretation. Biometrics 34: 1–23.
Kempthorne, O., 1997. Heritability: Uses and abuses. Genetica 99: 109–112.
Larry P. vs. Riles, 1972. 343 F Supp. 1306 (1972).
Livesey, P.M., 1966. The rat, rabbit, and cat in the Hebb-Williams closed field test of animal intelligence. Aust. J. Psychol. 18: 71–79.
Lovejoy, A.O., 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mainstream science on intelligenc, 1994. Wall Street Journal. Dec. 13 p. A18.
McNemar, Q., 1942. The Revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale, an Analysis of the Standardization Data. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Morgan, L.H., 1964. Ancient Society. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Morse, J., 1914. A comparison of white and colored children measured by the Binet scale of intelligence. Pop. Sci. Mon. 84 (Part 1): 75–79.
Pins, K., 1995. Iowa native behind ‘Bell Curve’ debate. Des Moines Register p. 1.
Rabinovitch, H.S. & H. Rosvold, 1951. A closed-field intelligence test for rats. Can. J. Psychol. 5: 122–128.
Rushton, J.P., 1995. Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
Spearman, C., 1904a. ‘General intelligence’ objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Psychol. 15: 201–292.
Spearman, C., 1904b. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15: 72–101.
Spencer, H., 1876. The comparative psychology of man. Pop. Sci. Mon. 8: 257–269.
Stocking, G.W., 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. Free Press, New York.
Thorndike, E.L., 1898. Animal intelligence. Psychol. Monogr. 2:(4).
Thorndike, E.L., 1904. An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements. Science Press, New York.
Tylor, E.B., 1889. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom, Vol. 1, 2. Holt, New York, 3rd edn.
Warren, N., 1972. African infant precocity. Psychol. Bull. 78: 353–367.
Young, K., 1922. Intelligence tests of certain immigrant groups. Scient. Mon. 15: 417–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrington, G.M. Psychological testing, IQ, and evolutionary fitness. Genetica 99, 113–123 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259515
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259515