Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the link between social responsibility and decision styles

  • Published:
International Journal of Value-Based Management

Abstract

The paper examines the factors that influence socially responsible decision making by individuals. The study found four social responsibility styles: “Playing it Safe,” “Weather The Storm,” “Problem to Solve,” and “Hope it Goes Away.” These styles describe individuals on the basis of decision style, propensity for risk, and coping style. The styles explain why people with different values might come to the same decision in the same circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock, R. H. 1980. “Modern Values and Corporate Social Responsibility.”MSU Business Topics Spring: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, B., and J. L. Myers. 1966. “Some Personality Correlates of Risk Taking.”Journal of General Psychology 74: 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., Jr. 1982. “Entrepreneurship in a Small Business Setting: An Exploratory Study.” Unpublished Dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • Clark, J. W. 1966.Religion and the Moral Standards of American Businessmen. Cincinnati: Southwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. E. 1985. “A Suggested Approach to Linking Decision Styles with Business Ethics.”Journal of Business Ethics 4: 137–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. 1984. “Personal Control and Stress and Coping Processes: A Theoretical Analysis.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 839–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., and R. S. Lazarus. 1985. “If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping During Three Stages of a College Examination.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 150–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H., and H. P. Sims, Jr. 1975. “Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment.”Journal of Applied Psychology 63: 451–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. P. Sims, Jr. 1979. “Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment.”Journal of Applied Psychology 64: 331–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., and S. J. Vitell. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing Spring: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. 1967.Personality Research Form Manual. Goshen: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. L. 1981. “Ethics and the Executive.”Business Horizons 24 (May–June): 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. 1971.Psychological Types. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. H. 1984. “Business' New Link Ethics and the Bottom Line.”Industry Week 29 Oct.: 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. 1976. “Introduction to Type.” A Report Published by the Center for Application of Psychological Type.

  • Rettig, S., and H. E. Rawson. 1963. “The Risk Hypothesis in Predictive Judgments of Unethical Behavior.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 243–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. 1966. “Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement.”Psychological Monographs 80 (1 whole no. 609).

  • Stevens, G. E. 1983. “Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Responses of Present and Future Managers.”Akron Business and Economic Review Fall: 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant, F., and J. L. Ginter. 1977. “Corporate Social Responsiveness.”California Management Review Spring: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11: 601–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. R., L. Chonko, and S. D. Hunt. 1986. “Social Responsibility and Personal Success: Are They Incompatible?”Journal of Business Research 14: 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitell, S.J., Wiebe, F.A., Scherer, R.F. et al. Examining the link between social responsibility and decision styles. Int J Value-Based Manage 2, 85–100 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01714886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01714886

Keywords

Navigation