Abstract
Inplane tensile fracture of unnotched and notched thermoset graphite-epoxy and thermoplastic graphite-PEEK composite laminates is examined. Both fibre-dominated quasi-isotropic and matrix dominated ±45 angle-ply layups were investigated.
Classical lamination theory predictions of elastic and strength properties of unnotched specimens are compared with experiments. Several notched geometries, i.e. centre-notched, double-edge notched and open-hole specimens subjected to tensile loading to fracture were examined. The notched strength of the quasi-isotropic laminates was analysed by a damage zone model, where damage around the notch is represented by an “equivalent crack” with cohesive force acting between the crack surfaces.
Good agreement between experimental and calculated strength was observed for the graphite-epoxy laminates which failed in a collinear manner. For the graphite-PEEK laminates discrepancies between predicted and experimental strength are related to observed deviations from collinear crack growth. The angle-ply graphite-PEEK laminates showed larger notch sensitivity than the corresponding graphite-epoxy, probably due to less degree of stress relieving damage formation around the notch.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. M. Whitney andR. J. Nuismer,J. Compos. Mater. 8 (1974) 253.
R. J. Nuismer andJ. M. Whitney, ASTM STP 593 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1975) p. 117.
M. E. Waddoups, J. R. Eisenmann andB. E. Kaminski,J. Compos. Mater. 5 (1971) 446.
R. B. Pipes, R. C. Wetherhold andJ. W. Gillespie,ibid. 13 (1979) 148.
J. Bäcklund,Comput. Struct. 13 (1981) 145.
J. Bäcklund andC.-G. Aronsson,J. Compos. Mater. 20 (1986) 259.
C.-G. Aronsson andJ. Bäcklund,ibid. 20 (1986) 287.
J. Awerbuch andM. S. Madhukar,J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 4 (1985) 3.
S. M. Bishop, G. D. Howard andC. J. Wood, “The Notch Sensitivity and Impact Performance of (0, ± 45) Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK”, RAE Technical Report 84066 (HMSO, London, 1984).
F. A. McClintock andG. R. Irwin, ASTM STP 381 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1965) p. 84.
A. Hillerborg, M. Modeer andP. E. Peterson,Cement Concrete Res. 6 (1976) 773.
J. F. Mandell, S. S. Wang andF. J. Mcgarry,J. Compos. Mater. 9 (1975) 266.
L. A. Carlsson andR. B. Pipes, “Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials” (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1987).
J. E. Ashton, J. C. Halpin andP. H. Petit, “Primer on Composite Materials: Analysis” (Technomic, Westport, Connecticut, 1969).
“CMAP”, Composite Software Users Guide, CCM, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1984).
S. W. Tsai andE. M. Wu,J. Compos. Mater. Vol. 5 (1971), p. 58.
R. Walsh, unpublished data, University of Delaware (1986).
J. W. Gillespie, Jr., L. A. Carlsson, R. B. Pipes, R. Rothschilds, B. Threthewey andA. Smiley, “Delamination Growth in Composite Materials”, NASA Contractor Report, NAG-1-475 (1985).
S. W. Tsai, “Composites Design — 1985” (Think Composites, Box 581, Dayton, Ohio, 1985).
T. K. O'brien, “Fatigue Delamination Behavior of PEEK Thermoplastic Composite Laminates”, Proceedings of the American Society for Composites First Conference on Composite Materials, Oct. 7–9 (1986), Dayton, OH.
H. Wennerström, R. Glemberg andH. Petersson, “GENFEM-3, a computer program for general finite element analysis”, User's Manual, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Structural Mechanics, Publication 79:4, Göteborg, 1979.
H. Wennerström andH. Petersson, “GENFEM- 3, a computer program for general finite element analysis”, Verification Manual, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Structural Mechanics, Publication 79:5, Göteborg, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlsson, L.A., Aronsson, C.G. & Bäcklund, J. Notch sensitivity of thermoset and thermoplastic laminates loaded in tension. J Mater Sci 24, 1670–1682 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01105690
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01105690