Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival – from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of spatial configuration for metapopulation survival is analyzed by using a stochastic metapopulation model. This model reveals conditions which must be satisfied by the species' ecology and the landscape settings before a metapopulation can persist over a long term. Taking this as a basis, initial rules of thumb for landscape management are deduced. The following results are highlighted: (1) the critical correlation length dc of the extinction processes determines a spatial scale of the metapopulation dynamics. (2) Only species with a dispersal range dr above the correlation length dc are able to benefit from landscape management at all. (3) A certain metapopulation can only persist over a long term if no patch is inside the range of correlation of another one. (4) There is a hierarchy of importance in the characteristics of a spatial configuration (scale and type) and, hence, in the scopes of landscape management. To conclude, some general consequences for supporting species survival by management are discussed. Some prospects concerning the use of models for decision support in landscape planning are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baars, M.A. and van Dijk, T.H. (1984). Population dynamics of two carabid beetles at a Dutch heathland. I. Subpopulation fluctuations in relation to weather and dispersal. J. Animal Ecology 53: 375-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer, P.J. 1981. On the survival of populations in a heterogeneous and variable environment. Oecologia (Berlin) 50: 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak, D.F. and Mills, L.S. 1994. A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75: 615-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler, M. and Wissel, C. 1997. Separability of local and regional dynamics in metapopulations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51: 9-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, P.L. 1946. Predation and vertebrate populations. Q. Rev. Biol. 41: 315-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., Poschlod, P. and Beinlich, B. (1996). Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals by sheep in calcareous grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology (in press).

  • Frank, K., Drechsler, M. and Wissel, C. 1994. Ñberleben in fragmentierten Lebensräumen – Stochastische Modelle zu Metapopulationen. Z. Ökologie Naturschutz 3: 167-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. 1990. Extinction of finite metapopulations in correlated environments. In Living in a Patchy Environment. pp. 177-186. Edited by B. Shorocks. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 1987. The demography of chance extinction. In Viable Populations for Conservation. pp. 11-34. Edited by M.E. Soulè. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, E. 1996. Population vulnerability of the Grey Bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata (Goeze, 1778) (Ensifera: Tettigoniidae). In Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. pp. 324-328. Edited by J. Settele, C.R. Margules, P. Poschlod and K. Henle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, V., Frank, K., Jeltsch, F., Brandl, R., Uchmanski, J. and Wissel, C. 1996. Pattern-oriented modelling in population ecology. Science of the Total Environment 183: 151-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg, M. and Silvestrov, D.S. (1994). Quasi-stationary distributions of a stochastic metapopulation model. J. Math. Biol. 33: 35-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol. J. Linnean Society 42: 17-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., Murphy, D.D. and Ehrlich, P.R. 1988. Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. Evidence for a metapopulation model. Am. Nat. 132: 360-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. and Quinn, J.F. 1989. Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations. Oikos 56: 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkhoven, J.T.R. 1995. Application of knowledge on fragmentation in planning.In Principles and tools for the study of landscape ecology-potentials and limitations. Proceedings of the Second CONNECT Workshop in Landscape Ecology 1993 (NERI Technical Report No. 131). pp. 98-100. Edited by F. Skov, J. Komdeur, G. Fry and J. Knudsen. National Environmental Research Institute.

  • Kareiva, P. and Shigesada, N. 1983. Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia (Berlin) 56: 234-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkovitch, L.P. and Fahrig, L. 1985. Spatial characteristics of habitat patches and population survival. Ecol. Modelling 30: 297-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73: 1943-1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. America 15: 237-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K.A. 1993. Determining process through pattern: reality or fantasy. In Patch Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 96). pp. 61-69. Edited by S.A. Levin, T.M. Powell and J.H. Steele. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagylaki, T., Keenan, P.T. and Dupont, T.F. (1993). The influence of spatial inhomogeneities on neutral models of geographical variation, III. Migration across a geographical barrier. Theor. Pop. Biology. 43: 217-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R.M. and Gurney, W.S.C. 1982. Modelling Fluctuating Populations. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poschlod, P., Bakker, J., Bonn, S. and Fischer, S. (1996). Dispersal of plants in fragmented landscapes. In Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. pp. 123-127. Edited by J. Settele, C.R. Margules, P. Poschlod and K. Henle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.F. and Hastings, A. 1987. Extinction in subdivided habitats. Conservation Biology 1: 198-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, P., Verboom, J., Knapen, J.P. and van Apeldoorn, R.C. 1996. Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS-based random walk model. Ecography 19: 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, N.H. 1996. Using landscape indices to predict habitatconnectivity. Ecology. 77: 1210-1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settele, S. and Geißler, S. 1988. Schutz des vom Aussterben bedrohten Blauschwarzen Moorbläulings durch Brachenerhalt, Grabenpflege und Biotopverbund im Filderraum. Natur und Landschaft 11: 467-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, T.D. and Margules, C.R. 1993. Habitat edges and restoration: methods for quantifying edge effects and prediciting the results of restoration efforts. In Reconstruction of Fragmented Ecosystems (Nature Conservation 3). pp. 57-69. Edited by D.A. Saunders, R.J. Hobbs and P.R. Ehrlich. Sarrey Beatty & Sons.

  • Stelter, C., Reich, M., Grimm, V. and Wissel, C. 1997. Modelling persistence in dynamic landscapes: lessons from a metapopulation of the grasshopper Bryodema tuberculata. J. Animal Ecology 66: 508-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf, L. 1997. Modelling individual movements in heterogeneous landscapes: potentials of a new approach. Ecological Modelling (in press).

  • Tischendorf, L. and Wissel, C. 1997. Corridors as conduits for small animals: Attainable distances depending on movement pattern, boundary reaction and corridor width. Oikos 79: 603-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom, J., Lankester, K. and Metz, J.A.J. 1991. Linking local and regional dynamics in stochastic metapopulation models. Biol. J. Linnean Society 42: 39-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom, J., Metz, J. and Meelis, E. 1993. Metapopulation models for impact assessment of fragmentation. In Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. (IALE Studies in Landscape Ecology 1). pp. 172-191. Edited by C.C. Vos and P. Opdam. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J.L., Paquet, P.C. and Ruggiero, L.F. 1996. Resilience and conservation of large carnivores in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology 10: 964-976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D.S., McLennan, C.H. and Dobson, A.P. 1986. Habitat-fragmentation in the temperate zone. In Conservation Biology. pp. 237-256. Edited by M.E. Soulè, Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G.G. and Willis, E.O. 1975. Applied biogeography. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities. pp. 523-534. Edited by M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissel, C., Stephan, Th., and Zaschke, S.-H. 1994. Modelling extinction of small populations. In Minimum viable populations. (Ecol. Studies 106). pp. 67-103. Edited by H. Remmert. Springer, Heidelberg-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. 1992. Mathematica-A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (Germany). 993 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecological Modelling, UFZ – Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle Ltd., P.O. Box 2, D-04301, Leipzig, Germany

    Karin Frank & Christian Wissel

Authors
  1. Karin Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Wissel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, K., Wissel, C. Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival – from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management. Landscape Ecology 13, 363–379 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008054906030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008054906030

Search

Navigation