Abstract
In Europe most conservation values, from biodiversity to scenic sites, are integral parts of agricultural landscapes. When these landscapes change as a result of agricultural policies, natural values – species, habitats, landscapes – are usually affected. Until recently however, these values have not been part of agricultural policies. The impacts of such new policies are difficult to evaluate because landscapes are complex and diverse, and the effects of policy are rarely immediate or causal.
This paper evaluates the potential effects of Agri-environmental Regulation EC 2078/92 on European agricultural landscapes through the use of agri-environmental indicators (AEIs) on policy effects. After discussing the general framework of the evaluation methodology through the use of AEIs, we distinguish two types of agri-environmental policy (AEP) effects: policy performances and policy outcomes. The impediments to direct measurement of policy outcomes are stated. The potential for measuring policy performances are checked in two case study areas, one in Spain and one in Denmark, characterized by extensive agricultural land-uses and by the dual process of intensification/abandonment that is threatening their natural values. Both study areas are currently targeted by agri-environmental schemes under Reg. 2078/92. The realisability or availability of suitable statistical data to construct and report each AEI is stated for both types of effects. A problem of scale and content is found in most of the available statistics for assessing policy outcomes and the need for data at farm level is concluded to be indispensable if policy performances are to be measured. Effects of policy performance are measured for key selected AEIs in each study area on the basis of the results of a field survey based on questionnaires of participating and non-participating farmers in the AEP schemes. The main effects may be catalogued as improvement effects or protection effects since they represent a change in participant over non-participant farmers' decisions. Finally, the importance of this type of policy evaluation approach is discussed in the light of the likely future development of AEP in the European Union.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agger, P. and Brandt, J. 1988. Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 4: 227–240.
Ales, R.F., Martin, A., Ortega, F. and Ales, E.E. 1992. Recent changes in landscape structure and function in a Mediterranean region of southwest Spain. Landscape Ecology 7: 3–18.
Alonso, J.C. and Alonso, J.A. 1996. The Great Bustard (Otis tarda) in Spain: present status, recent trends and an evaluation of earlier censuses. Biological Conservation 77: 79–86.
Andersen, E., Primdahl, J. and Solvang, V. 1998. Miljøvenlige jordbrugsforanstaltninger og de særligt følsomme landbrugsområder 1994–96.
Asbirk, S. and Søgaard, M. (Eds). 1991. Rødliste 90. Miljøministeriet, Copenhagen.
Baldock, D. Beaufoy, G., Brower, F. and Godeschalk, F. 1996. Farming at the margins. Abandonment or redeployment of agricultural land in Europe. LEI-DLO, London, The Hague.
Barret, G.W. 1992. Landscape ecology: designing sustainable agricultural landscapes. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2: 83–103.
Bethe, F. and Bolsius, E.C.A. (Eds). 1996. Marginalization and agricultural land in The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague.
Bernáldez, F.G., Rey Benayas, J.M., Levassor, C. and Peco, B. 1989. Landscape ecology of uncultivated lowlands in Central Spain. Landscape Ecology 2: 3–18.
Birks, H.H., Birks, H.J.B., Kaland, P.E. and Moe, D. (Eds). 1988. The Cultural Landscape. Past, Present and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brouwer, F. 1995. Indicators to Monitor agri-environmental policy in the Netherlands. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, The Hague.
Brouwer, F. and Crabtree, R. (Eds) 1999. Agriculture and Environment in Europe: The role of indicators in agricultural policy development. CAB International, Wallingford.
Buller, H., Wilson. G. and Höll, A. (Eds). Agri-environmental policy in the European Union. Ashgate, London (in press).
Bunce, R.G.H., Ryzhowski, L. and Paoletti, M.G. (Eds). 1993 Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Paton.
de Putter, J. 1995. The Greening of Europe s Agricultural Policy: the 'Agri-environmental Regulation' of the MacSharry reform. Ministry of Agriculture, NatureManagement and Fisheries and Agricultural Economics Research Institute LEI-DLO, The Hague.
European Commission. 1988. The Future of Rural Society. COM 88/501, Brussels.
European Commission. 1992. Council Regulation on Agricultural Methods Compatible with the Requirements of the Protection of Environment and the Maintenance of the Countryside. EC 2078/92. DO no. L 215 of 30.6.1992, p. 85.
Florín, M., Besteiro, A.G. and Montes, C. Ecological supports to model the hydrological function of Mediterranean wetlands: methodological management implications. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Science (in press).
Gulinck, H. 1986 Landscapes ecological aspects of agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 16: 79–86.
Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D. and Woodward, R. 1995. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington.
Jensen, J. 1987. Strandenge–naturvenlig drift og pleje. Skov-og Naturstyrelsen, Copenhagen.
Larsen, S.N. and Vikstrøm, T. 1995. Ferske enge–en beskyttet naturtype. Miljø-og Energiministeriet, Copenhagen.
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
MacRae, T., Hillary, N., MacGregor, R.J. and Smith, C.A.S. 1995. Design and Development of Environmental Indicators with Reference to Canadian Agriculture. In North AmericanWorkshop on Monitoring for Ecological Assessment of Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems. pp. 118–139. Edited by C. Aguirre. General Technical Report RM-GTR-284. US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Martínez, C. 1994. Habitat selection of the Little bustard Tetrax tetrax in cultivated areas of Central Spain. Biological Conservation 67: 125–128.
McKenzie, D.H., Hyatt, D.E. and Mc Donald, V.J. 1992. Ecological Indicators. Vols. 1 and 2. Chapman & Hall, London.
O'Connor, R.J. and Shrubb, M. 1986. Farming and Birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Oñate, J.J. and Alvarez, P. 1997. El programa de Estepas Cerealistas en Castilla y León. Revista Española de Economía Agraria 179: 297–330.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1993. OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. Environmental Monograph No. 83, Paris.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1997. Environmental indicators for agriculture. OECD, Paris.
Pain, D.J. and Pienkowski, M.W. (Eds). 1997. Farming and birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its implication for bird conservation. Academic Press, London.
Parris, K. (1997) Agriculture and the Environment: A Sustainable Complementary. The OECD Observer, December 1996/January 1997: 10–12.
Peco, B. Malo, J.E. Oñate, J.J., Suárez, F. and Sumpsi, J.M. 1999. Agri-environmental indicators for extensive land-use systems in Spain. In Brouwer, F. and Crabtree, R. (Eds) Agriculture and Environment in Europe: The role of indicators in agricultural policy development. pp. 137–156. CAB International, Wallingford.
Potter, C. 1988. Conserving nature: Agri-environmental policy development and change. In The geography of rural change. Edited by B. Ilbery. Longman, Harlow.
Primdahl, J. and Brandt, J. 1997. CAP, nature conservation and physical planning. In CAP and the regions. Building a Multidisciplinary framework for the analysis of the EU Agricultural Space. Edited by C. Laurent and I. Bowler. Institut National de la Reserche Agronomique, Paris.
Prip, C., Wind, P. and Jørgensen, H. (Eds). 1995. Biologisk mangfold i Danmark–status og strategi. Miljø-og Energiministeriet, Copenhagen.
Rey Benayas, J.M., Bernáldez, F.G., Levassor, C. and Peco, B. 1990. Vegetation of aquifer discharges as conditioned by groundwater flows and solute transfer: The case of the Douro Basin, Central Spain. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 461–466.
Ritson, C. and Harvey, D.R. (Eds). 1997. The Common Agricultural Policy. 2nd edition. CAB International, Wallingford.
Scheele, M. 1996. The agri-environmental measures in the context of the CAP reform. In The European environment and CAP reform. pp. 3–7. Edited by M. Whitby. CAB International, Wallingford.
Suárez, F., Naveso, M.A. and de Juana, E. 1996. Farming in the drylands of Spain: birds of pseudosteppes. In Farming and birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its implication for bird conservation. pp. 297–330. Edited by D. Pain and M. Pienkowski. Academic Press, London.
Sumpsi, J.M. and Varela, C. 1995. The Common Agrienvironmental Policy and its Application to Spain. In Environmental land-use issues. An economic perspective. Edited by L.M. Albisu and C. Romero. Wissenschaftsverlag, Kiel.
Vink, A.P.A. 1983. Landscape Ecology and Land-use. Longman, London.
Winter, S. 1994. Implementering og effektivitet. Systime, Copenhagen.
Whitby, M. (Ed). 1996. The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and prospects for conservation. CAB International, Wallingford.
World Wildlife Fund. 1995. Measuring Progress Towards Biointensive IPM: A Methodology to Track Pesticide Use, Risks and Reliance. WWF Technical Report, Gland.
Zonneveld, I.S. 1988. Landscape ecology and its application. In Landscape Ecology and Management. pp. 3–17. Edited by M.R. Moss. Polyscience Publications Inc., Montreal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oñate, J.J., Andersen, E., Peco, B. et al. Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes: the role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation. Landscape Ecology 15, 271–280 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008155229725
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008155229725