Abstract
We reanalyzed a model introduced by T. R. Madden for the evaluation of the state of connectivity among the microcrack population existing inside crystalline rocks. The model assumes that cracks are distributed randomly in a cubic lattice with a basic occupation probability, p.Depending on the value of p, the stale of connectivity can give rise to macroscopic paths, which allow electrical conduction of the sample, or to extended crack surfaces, which would be responsible for rock failure. The position of the phase boundaries, that is, the threshold values of pfor the onset of conductivity or macroscopic fracture, are estimated by a real-space renormalizalion-group (RG) technique. By identifying all the relevant configurations of the lattice model, we have been able to provide explicit analytic formulae for the critical lines. The criterion used by Madden to “accept” the existence of microscopic linear connectivity is modified and the new consequences discussed. We analyze the limitations of simple versions of the RG technique, in particular when concerned with anisotropic spatial distributions of cracks. Finally, we emphasize the interest of acquiring experimental data, especially to test the position of the conduction thresholds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allegre, C. J., le Mouel, L., and Provost, A., 1982, Scaling rules in crack fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction: Nature, v. 297, no. 5861, p. 47–49.
Bebbington, M., Vere-Jones, D., and Zheng, X., 1990, Percolation theory: A model for rock fracture?: Geophys. Jour. Intern., v. 100, no. 2, p. 215–220.
Burkhard, T. W., and van Leeuwen, J. M. J., eds., 1982, Real space renormalization: Springer Verlag, Berlin, 214 p.
Essam, J. W., 1972, Percolation and cluster size,in Domb, C., and Green, M. S., eds. Phase transitions and critical phenomena: vol. 2: Academic Press, London, p. 197–270.
Essam, J. W., 1980, Percolation theory: Rept. Prog. Phys., v. 43, p. 833–912.
Jaeger, J. C., and Cook, N. G. W., 1976, Fundamentals of rock mechanics (2nd Ed.): Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London, 585 p.
Kadanoff, L. P., 1966, Scaling laws for Ising models near T.: Physics, v. 2, p. 263–272.
Kirkpatrick, S., 1973, Percolation and conduction: Rev. Mod. Phys., v. 45, p. 574–588.
Madden, T. R., 1982, Microcrack connectivity in rocks: A renormalization group approach to the critical phenomena of conduction and failure in crystalline rocks: Jour. Geophys. Res. B, v. 88, no. 1, p. 585–592.
Reynolds, P. J., Klein, W., and Stanley, H. E., 1972, A real space renormalization group for site and bond percolation: Jour. Phys. C, v. 10, p. L167.
Smalley, R. F., Turcotte, D. L., and Solla, S. A., 1985, A renormalization group approach to the stick-slip behaviour of faults: Jour. Geophys. Res., B, v. 90, no. 2, p. 1894–1900.
Stauffer, D., 1979, Scaling theory of percolation clusters: Phys. Rept., v. 54, p. 1–74.
Turcotte, D. L., 1986, Fractals and fragmentation: Jour. Geophys. Res., B, v. 91, no. 2, p. 1921–1926.
Wilson, K. G., 1975, The renormalization group: critical phenomena and the Kondo problem: Rev. Mod. Phys., v. 47, p. 773–840.
Young, A. P., and Stinchcomb, R. B., 1975, Renormalization-group theory for percolation problems: Jour. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., v. 8, p. L535-L540.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gómez, J.B., Pacheco, A.F. & Seguí-Santonja, A.J. A model for crack connectivity in rocks, a discussion. Math Geol 27, 23–39 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083566
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083566