Skip to main content
Log in

A genetically related response to iron deficiency stress in muskmelon

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mutant muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) with characteristic Fe-deficiency chlorosis symptoms was compared to related cultivars in its ability to obtain Fe via the widely known Fe-stress response mechanisms of dicotyledonous plants. The three cultivars (fefe, the ‘Fe-inefficient’ mutant; Mainstream and Edisto, both ‘Fe efficient’ plants) were grown in nutrient solution in either 0 or 3.5 mg L-1 Fe as FeCl3. None of the three cultivars released ‘reductants’ or ‘phytosiderophores’, but both Edisto and Mainstream produced massive amounts of H+ ions to reduce and maintain the pH of nutrient solutions below pH 4.0. The roots of these two Fe-efficient cultivars were also capable of reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+. These responses maintained green plants, resulted in high leaf Fe in both Edisto and Mainstream, and produced Mn toxicity in Mainstream. The lack of Fe-deficiency stress response in fefe not only affected leaf Fe concentration and chlorosis, but also resulted in reduced uptake of Mn. The importance of reduced Fe (Fe2+) to the Fe-efficient cultivars was confirmed by growing the cultivars with BPDS (4, 7-diphenyl-1, 10-phenanthroline disulfonic acid, a ferrous chelator) and EDDHA [ethylene-diamine di (0-hydroxphenylacetic acid)] (a ferric chelator), and observing increased chlorosis and reduced Fe uptake in BPDS grown plants. The Fe-deficiency response observed in these cultivars points out the diversity of responses to Fe deficiency stress in plants. The fefe mutant has a limited ability to absorb Fe and Mn and perhaps could be used to better understand Mn uptake in plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown J C 1978 Mechanism of iron uptake by plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C, Chaney R L and Ambler J E 1971 A new tomato mutant inefficient in transport of iron. Physiol. Plant. 25, 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp S D, Jolley V D and Brown J C 1987 Comparative evaluation of factors involved in Fe stress response in tomato and soybean J. Plant Nutr. 10, 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1950 The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. 347, Calif. Agric. Expt. Stn., Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley V D, Brown J C and Blaylock M J 1988 An iron chelating compound released by barley roots in response to Fe-deficiency stress. J. Plant Nutr. 11, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent P E and Bhella H S 1988 A new chlorotic mutant of muskmelon. HortScience 23, 379–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen R A and Brown J C 1980 Factors related to iron uptake by dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. I. pH and reductant. J. Plant Nutr. 2, 629–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg R A 1953 Symptoms of molybdenum deficiency in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 28, 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Jolley, D., Brown, J.C. & Nugent, P.E. A genetically related response to iron deficiency stress in muskmelon. Plant Soil 130, 87–92 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011860

Key words

Navigation