Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf responses to soil water deficits: Comparative sensitivity of leaf expansion rate and leaf conductance in field-grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative importance of changes in leaf expansion rate (LER) and leaf conductance (g1) in the control of crop transpiration depends primarily on their sensitivity to soil water deficits. The aim of this paper was to quantify the responses of LER and g1 to soil water deficits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under conditions of moderate (spring) and high (summer) evaporative demand. Soil water content, g1, and LER were measured in dryland (DRY) and daily-irrigated (WET) crops established on a deep sandy-loam (Typic Xerofluvent) in a Mediterranean environment. There was no difference between g1 of DRY and WET plants (p>0.20) in contrast with a highly significant difference in LER (p<0.001). Even under the harsh conditions of the summer experiment, g1 did not respond to water deficit in a ten-day period in which LER of DRY plants was reduced to approx. 30% of that measured in WET controls. This field study indicates that g1 plays at most a minor role in the control of sunflower transpiration in the pre-anthesis period and confirms the importance of leaf expansion in the regulation of gas exchange of expanding canopies subjected to soil water deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burke J J and Upchurch D R 1989 Leaf temperature and transpirational control in cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 29, 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor D J and Jones T R 1985 Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. II. Morphological and physiological responses to water shortage. Field Crops Res. 12, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor D J and Sadras V O 1992. Physiology of yield expression in sunflower. Field Crops Res. 30, 333–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox W J and Jolliff G D 1987 Crop-water relations of sunflower and soybean under irrigated and dryland conditions. Crop Sci. 27, 553–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale J E 1988 The control of leaf expansion. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 267–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies W J and Zhang J 1991 Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • English S D, McWilliam G R, Smith R C G and Davidson G L 1978 Photosynthesis and partitioning of dry matter in sunflower. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E 1989 Stomatal conductance: Measurement and significance. Proc. 21st Colloquium Int. Potash Institute, Bern. pp. 219–233.

  • Gimenez C, Fereres E 1985. Genetic variability in sunflower cultivars under drought. II. Growth and water relations. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37, 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollan T, Passioura J B, Munns R 1986 Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao T C 1990 Measurements of plant water status. In Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Eds. B AStewart and D RNielsen. pp 244–279. ASA, CSSA, and SSAA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao T C, Acevedo E, Fereres E and Henderson D W 1976 Stress metabolism: Water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso S B 1983. Stomatal regulation of evaporation from well-watered plant canopies: A new synthesis. Agric. Meteorol. 29, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P G and McNaughton K G 1986 Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C A and Kiniry J R 1986 CERES-MAIZE: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neales T F, Masia A, Zhang J and Davies W J 1989 The effects of partially drying part of the root system of Helianthus annuus L. on the abscicic acid content of the roots, xylem sap and leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 40, 1113–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson H M, Constable G A and Howe G N 1980 Carbon production of sunflower cultivars in field and controlled environments. II. Leaf growth. Aust J. Plant Physiol. 7, 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J T 1981 Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Plant and Soil 58, 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal W D, Arkin G F, Shouse P J and Jordan W R 1987 Water deficits effects on transpiration and leaf growth. Agron. J. 79, 1019–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadras V O, Whitfield D M and Conor D J 1991 Regulation of water use by sunflower crops: A comparison between hybrids of different stature. Field Crops Res. 28, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadras V O, Villalobos F J and Fereres E 1993 Leaf expansion in field-grown sunflower in response to soil and leaf water status. Agron. J. (in press).

  • Turner N C and Singh D P 1984 Responses of adaxial and abaxial stomato to light and water deficits in sunflower and sorghum. New Phytol. 96, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C, Schulze E D and Gollan T 1984 The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. Oecologia (Berlin) 63, 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C, Begg J E and Tonnet M L 1978 Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos F J and Ritchie J T 1992 The effect of temperature on leaf emergence rates of sunflower genotypes. Field Crops Res. 29, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise R R, Frederick J R, Alm D M, Kramer D M, Hesketh J D, Crofts A R and Ort D R 1990 Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Environ. 13, 923–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe D W, Sadras V O, Villalobos P J and Fereres E 1992 Photosynthetic recovery from drought in relation to stress effect on leaf osmotic potential and nitrogen content. Summary of Scientific Contributions 13th International Sunflowert Conference, Pisa, September 1992, p. 54. Pacini Editore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadras, V.O., Villalobos, F.J., Fereres, E. et al. Leaf responses to soil water deficits: Comparative sensitivity of leaf expansion rate and leaf conductance in field-grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Soil 153, 189–194 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012991

Key words

Navigation