Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of two wheat varieties to sulphur addition and diagnosis of sulphur deficiency

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sulphur deficiency has become increasingly widespread in wheat in the U.K. Growth, nutrient content and biochemical responses to S and N supply of a breadmaking wheat variety (Hereward) and a non-breadmaking variety (Riband) were investigated in a pot experiment. Shoot dry matter (DM) at stem extension (Zadok's GS 37) and at maturity was increased markedly by S. Grain production of the Riband variety was more susceptible to the imbalance of N to S than the Hereward variety. At GS 37, the concentrations of total S and sulphate-S of shoots, chlorophyll meter readings and the concentrations of glutathione of the uppermost fully expanded leaves were increased significantly by increasing S supply, whereas the concentrations of nitrate and amides were decreased by S. The greatest relative changes in response to S supply were those of the glutathione and asparagine concentrations. Riband also showed greater response to S than Hereward. Critical values of various diagnostic indices at GS 37 were derived from the relationships between DM yield and different indices. The two varieties showed similar diagnostic curves except that for the ratio of total N to total S (N:S) in shoots. Either total S or sulphate-S can be used alone as a good indicator of deficiency, and with values of 1500 and 190 mg kg-1 DM in shoots for the two indices respectively. There was also a well defined relationship between DM yield and the glutathione concentration, with a critical value of 240 nmol g-1 FW. There were no advantages of using % of total S as sulphate-S. Shoot N:S ratio was found to be less accurate in predicting S deficiency than total S or sulphate-S. For prognostic purposes, a much higher S status at GS 37 was required to ensure no losses of DM yield due to S deficiency at maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell C I, Clarkson D T and Cram W J 1995 Partitioning and redistribution of sulphur during S stress in Macroptilium atropurpeum cv Siratro. J. Exp. Bot. 46, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment 1995 Digest of Environmental Statistics, Report No. 17. HMSO, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat 5 Committee 1993 Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R H, Piekielek W P and Macneal K M 1994 Using a chlorophyll meter to predict nitrogen-fertilizer needs of winter wheat. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25, 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freney J R, Spencer K and Jones M B 1978 The diagnosis of sulphur deficiency in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29, 727–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haneklaus S, Fleckenstein J and Schnug E 1995 Comparative studies of plant and soil analysis for the sulphur status of oilseed rape and winter wheat. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd. 158, 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschbach C and Rennenberg H 1994 Influence of glutathione (GSH) on net uptake of sulfate and sulfate transport in tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 45, 1069–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmoker J L, Clarkson D T, Saker L R, Rooney J M and Purves J V 1991 Sulphate deprivation depresses the transport of nitrogen to the xylem and the hydraulic conductivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) roots. Planta 185, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnicol P K and Randall P J 1987 Changes in the levels of major sulfur metabolites and free amino-acids in pea cotyledons recovering from sulfur deficiency. Plant Physiol. 83, 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Second edition. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath S P and Zhao F J 1995 A risk assessment of sulphur deficiency in cereals using soil and atmospheric deposition data. Soil Use Manage. 11, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath S P and Zhao F J 1996 Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 126, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton G L, Dorian R and Fahey R C 1981 Analysis of biological thiols: derivatization with monobromobiamne and separation by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 114, 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne P I, Nightingale M A, Krattiger A F and Holt L M 1987 The relationship between HMW glutenin subunit composition and the bread-making quality of British-grown wheat varieties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 40, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen J, Virtanen A and Haggren E 1995 Using a chlorophyll meter to optimize nitrogen fertilizer application for intensively-managed small-grain cereals. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 174, 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton A and Randall P J 1995 Sulfur requirements during early growth of Trifolium balansae, Trifolium subterraneum, Medicago murex, and Phalaris aquatica. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 35, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe E 1990 Stress Physiology: the functional significance of the accumulation of nitrogen containing compounds. J. Hort. Sci. 65, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall P J, Spencer K and Freney J R 1981 Sulfur and nitrogen-fertilizer effects on wheat 1. Concentrations of sulfur and nitrogen and the nitrogen to sulfur ratio in grain, in relation to the yield response. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 32, 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen P E, Ramig R E, Ekin L G and Rohde C R 1977 Tissue analyses guidelines for diagnosing sulfur deficiency in white wheat. Plant and Soil 46, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennenberg H 1995 Processes involved in glutathione metabolism. In Amino Acids and Their Derivatives in Higher Plants. Ed. R M Wallsgrove. pp 155–171. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife A and Burns I G 1986 The Sulphate S/total S ratio in plants as an index of their sulphur status. Plant and Soil, 91, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer K and Freney J R 1980 Assessing the sulfur status of field-grown wheat by plant analysis. Agron. J. 72, 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syers J K, Skinner R J and Curtin D 1987 Soil and fertiliser sulphur in UK agriculture, Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society, No. 264. Fertiliser Society, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelpdale D M 1992 An overview of the atmospheric sulphur cycle. In Sulphur Cycling on the Continents. Eds. R W Howarth, J W B Stewart and M V Ivanov. pp 5–26. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, McGrath S P and Crosland A R 1994 Comparison of three wet digestion methods for the determination of plant sulphur by inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F J, McGrath S P, Crosland A R and Salmon S E 1995 Changes in the sulphur status of British wheatgrain in the last decade, and its geographical distribution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 68, 507–514.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, F.J., Hawkesford, M.J., Warrilow, A.G.S. et al. Responses of two wheat varieties to sulphur addition and diagnosis of sulphur deficiency. Plant Soil 181, 317–327 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012066

Key words

Navigation