Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of some extractants for available zinc in relation to response of rice to applied zinc in Sub-Himalayan hill and forest soils

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The available Zn in 25 soils of Sub-Himalayan hill and forest region was determined by using some chemical extractants to evaluate its critical limit in soils and rice plant. The critical limit of soil available Zn using DTPA-CaCl2, DTPA-NH4HCO3, EDTA-NH4OAc and EDTA-(NH4)2CO3 was 0.76, 0.86, 0.85 and 1.18 ppm, respectively. The amount of Zn extracted by these extractants was positively and significantly correlated with per cent dry matter yield. In addition to per cent dry matter yield, the Zn extracted by DTPA-CaCl2, DTPA-NH4 HCO3 and EDTA-(NH4)2CO3 was also positively correlated with Zn concentration in 3rd leaf of rice, Zn concentration in rice shoots, Zn uptake by rice shoots and organic carbon content of the soil, and negatively correlated with soil pH.The 2N MgCl2 and 0.1N HCl extractants were found to be not suitable for these soils. Among the four promising extractants, EDTA-(NH4)2CO3 was most efficient as the value of critical limit determined by it expressed 82.4% predictability in the degree of accuracy against 36.8% with EDTA-NH4OAc. Hence EDTA-NH4OAc is the least efficient extractant for estimation of available Zn in such soils. The critical Zn concentration in 3rd leaf of rice was worked out to be 21.5 ppm below which economic responses to Zn application can be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bansal R L, Takkar P N, Sahota N S and Mann M S 1980 Evaluation of soil procedures for predicting zinc availability to wheat under calcareous alkaline field conditions. Field Crops Research 3, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray R H 1948 Correlation of soil test with crop responses to added fertilizers and with fertilizer requirement.In Diagnostic Techniques for Soils and Crops. Ed. H B Kitchen. American Potash Institute, Washington, D.C. Ch. 2, pp. 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown A L, Quick J and Eddings J L 1971 A comparison of analytical methods for soil zinc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cate R B and Nelson L A 1965 A rapid method for correlation of soil test analysis with crop response data. International Soil Testing Series Technical Bulletin No. 1. North Carolina State University. Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cate R B and Nelson L A 1971 A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 658–660.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forno D A, Yoshida S and Asher J 1975 Zinc deficiency in rice I. Soil factors associated with the deficiency. Plant and Soil 42, 537–550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert R M, Datta N P, Sankarasubramoney H, Leley V K and Donahu R L 1965 Soil Testing in India. United State Agency for International Development Mission to India New Delhi 2nd Ed. 55 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano P M and Mortvedt J J 1974 Response of several rice cultivars to zinc. Agron. J. 66, 220–223.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Havlin J L and Soltanpour P N 1981 Evaluation of the NH4HCO3-DTPA soil test for iron and zinc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson M L 1967 Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katyal J C and Ponnamperuma F N 1974 Zinc deficiency: a widespread nutritional disorder of rice in Agusan del Norte. Philipp. Agric. 58, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay W L and Norvell W A 1978 Development of a DTPA Soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and Copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matt K John 1960 Extractable and plant available zinc in horizons of several Fraser river alluvial soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 54, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson J L, Brown L C and Viets F G 1959 A method of assessing zinc status of soils using acid extractable zinc and ‘titratable alkalinity’ values. Soil Sci. 88, 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nene Y L 1966 Symptoms, cause and control of ‘Khaira’ disease of paddy. Indian Phytopathological Soc. Bull. 3, 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rathore G S, Gupta C P, Khamparia R S and Sinha S B 1978 Response of wheat to zinc application in alluvial soils of Morena district (Madhya Pradesh). J Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 26, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sakal R 1977 Note on varietal response of rice to soil applied zinc. Indian J. agric. Sci. 47, 480–482.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakal R and Singh A P 1979 Zinc hunger in kharif crops of North Bihar. Indian Fmg. 28, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakal R, Singh A P, Thakur K N and Sinha H 1979 Response of rice to zinc and its critical level in Old Alluvium Reddish Yellow-Grey Catenary Soils of Bihar. Paper presented at the joint India/FAO/Norway seminar on Micronutrients in Agriculture held at New Delhi, India.

  20. Sakal R, Singh A P and Singh B P 1981 Evaluation of critical limit of zinc in calcareous soils for predicting response of maize to applied zinc fertilizer. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 97, 493–495.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sakal R, Singh B P and Singh A P 1982 Determination of critical limit of zinc in soil and plant for predicting response of rice to zinc application in calcareous soils. Plant and Soil 66, 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh A P, Sakal R, Thakur K N and Sinha H 1980 Response of wheat to zinc and its critical level in Old Alluvium soils. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 95, 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart J A and Berger K C 1965 Estimation of available soil zinc using MgCl2 as extractant. Soil Sci. 100, 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takkar P N, Mann M S and Randhawa N S 1974 Note on relationship between wheat yield and zinc contents in wheat plants exhibiting different degrees of zinc deficiency symptoms. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 44, 679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Takkar P N, Bansal R L, Mann M S and Randhawa N S 1976 Micronutrient status of soils and crops in Punjab. Fert. News. 8, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka A and Yoshida S 1970 Nutritional disorders of the rice plant in Asia. Int. Rice Res. Inst. Tech. Bull. No. 10, 51 p.

  27. Trierweiler J F and Lindsay W L 1969 EDTA-ammonium carbonate soil test for zinc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tucker T C and Kurtz L T 1955 A comparison of several chemical methods with bioassay procedures for extracting zinc from soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 19, 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Viets Jr F G 1962 Chemistry and availability of micronutrients in soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 10, 174–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida S, Forno D A and Bhadrachalam A 1971 Zinc deficiency of the rice plant on calcareous and neutral soils in the Philippines. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. Japan 17, 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshida S, Ahn J S and Forno D A 1973 Occurrence, diagnosis and correction of zinc deficiency of low land rice. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. Japan 19, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakal, R., Singh, A.P., Singh, B.P. et al. Assessment of some extractants for available zinc in relation to response of rice to applied zinc in Sub-Himalayan hill and forest soils. Plant Soil 79, 417–428 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184332

Key words

Navigation