Skip to main content
Log in

Donor optimization and the food stamp program

  • Articles
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaron, H. and G. von Furstenberg. “The Inefficiency of Transfers in Kind: The Case of Housing Assistance.”Western Economic Journal (June, 1971), 184–191.

  • Benus, J., J. Kmenta, and H. Shapiro. “The Dynamics of Household Budget Allocation to Food Expenditures.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 58 (May, 1976), 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E. “A Comment On Distributional Externalities and In-Kind Transfers.”Public Finance Quarterly, 4(April, 1976), 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, K. W.Food Stamps and Nutrition. Washington, 1975.

  • Daly, G. and J. F. Giertz. “Benevolence, Malevolence and Economic Theory.” Public Choice13 (Fall,1972),1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Welfare Economics and Welfare Reform.”American Economic Review, 62 (March, 1972), 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbear, F. T. “On the Theory of Optimum Externality.”American Economic Review, 57 (March, 1967), 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, P. “Suggestions for the Analysis of Qualitative Dependent Variables.”Public Finance Quarterly, 1 (July, 1973), 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinckel, I. “Is In-Kind Redistribution Efficient?”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (May, 1973), 320–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, R. S. “Pareto Optimal Redistribution: Comment.”American Economic Review, 60 (Dec. 1970), 994–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, H. M. and J. D. Rodgers. “Pareto Optimal Redistribution.”American Economic Review, 59 (September, 1969), 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulett, J. R. “On the Use of Regression Analysis with a Qualitative Dependent Variable.”Public Finance Quarterly, 1 (July, 1973), 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, N.Let Them Eat Promises: The Politics of Hunger in America. Englewood Cliffs, 1969.

  • Okun, A. M.Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, 1975.

  • Olsen, E. O. “Some Theorems in the Theory of Efficient Transfers.”Journal of Political Economy, 79 (January/February, 1971), 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Reply.”American Economic Review, 61 (March, 1971), 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. “Efficiency in the Provision of Consumption Subsidies.”Kyklos, 23 (January, 1970), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. D. “Explaining Income Redistribution.” in H. M. Hochman and G. E. Peterson, editors,Redistribution through Public Choice. New York, 1974.

  • Schmidt, W. “Charitable Exploitation.”Public Choice, 6 (Spring, 1969), 103–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, J. A.Food for the Hungry. Baltimore, 1970.

  • Thurow, L. “The Income Distribution as a Public Good”Quarterly Journal of Economics, (May, 1971), 327–334.

  • Tullock, G. “The Charity of the Uncharitable.”Western Economic Journal, 9 (December, 1971), 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Information without Profit.”Papers on Non-Market Decision Making, 1 (1966), 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Comment.”American Economic Review, 61 (March, 1971), 218–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The authors are members of the Department of Economics, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. Kenneth Lehn was an important contributor to Section IV.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fred Giertz, J., Sullivan, D.H. Donor optimization and the food stamp program. Public Choice 29, 19–35 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718560

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718560

Keywords

Navigation