Abstract
Twenty-two cultivars and lines of winter and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied, most for the first time, for their anther culture response. The response was genotype dependent. Plants grown in the field gave higher callus induction frequency than those grown in the greenhouse and the controlled environment chamber. Donor plants grown in a season of low drought stress as compared to a season of severe drought stress resulted in a higher frequency of callus induction. Spherical microcalli were observed in two wheat genotypes in some of only those anthers that were placed with only one loculus in contact with the medium. Wheat lines that were more responsive to anther culture were identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baenziger, PS, Kudirka, DT, Schaeffer, GW & Lazaar, MD (1984) The significance of doubled haploid variation. Stadler Genet. Symp. 16: 384–414
Bjornstad, A, Opsahl-Ferstad, H-G & Aasmo, M (1989) Effects of donor plant environment and light during incubation on anther cultures of some spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 17: 27–37
Chu CC (1978) The N6 medium and its applications to anther culture of cereal crops. In: Proceedings of symposium on plant tissue culture (pp 43–45). Peking Sci Press
Collins, GB (1977) Production and utilization of anther derived haploids in crop plants. Crop Sci. 17: 583–586
Craig, IL (1974) Haploid plants (2n=21) from in vitro anther culture of T. aestivum Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 16: 696–700
Foroughi-Wehr, B & Mix, G (1979) In vitro response of Hordeum vulgare L. anthers cultured from plants grown under different environments. Environ. Exp. Bot. 19: 303–309
Han-min, Y, Keppenne, VD, Baenziger, PS, Berke, T & Liang, GH (1990) Effect of genotype and medium on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult 21: 253–258
Hunter, CP (1985) The effect of anther orientation on the production of microspore-derived embryoids and plants of Hordeum vulgare cv Sabarlis. Plant Cell Reports 4: 267–268
Jones, AM & Petolino, JF (1987) Effects of donor plant genotype and growth environment on anther culture of soft red winter wheat (T. aestivum L.) Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 8: 215–223
Lazar, MD, Baenziger, PS & Schaeffer, GW (1984) Combining abilities and heritability of callus formation and plantlet regeneration in wheat (T. aestivum L.). anther cultures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 131–134
Liang, GH, Sangduen, N, Heyne, EG & Sears, ER (1982) Polyhaploid production through anther culture in common wheat. J. Hered. 73: 360–364
Metz, SG, Sharma, HC, Armstrong, TA & Mascia, PN (1988) Chromosome doubling and aneuploidy in anther-derived plants from two winter wheat lines. Genome 30: 177–181
Ouyang, JW, Hu, H, Chuang, CC & Tseng, CC (1973) Induction of pollen plants from anthers of T. aestivum L. cultured in vitro. Sci. Sin. 16: 79–95
Ouyang, JW, He, DG, Feng, GH & Jia, SE (1987) The response of anther culture to culture temperature varies with growth conditions of anther-donor plants. Plant Sci. 49: 145–148
Powell, W, Borrino, E & Godall, V (1988) The effect of anther orientation on microspore-derived plant production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Euphytica 38: 159–163
Schaeffer, GW, Baenziger, PS & Worley, J (1979) Haploid plant development from anthers and in vitro embryo culture of wheat. Crop Sci. 19: 697–702
Shannon, PRM, Nicholson, AE, Dunwell, JM & Davies, DR (1985) Effects of anther orientation on microspore-callus production in barley (Hordeum vulgare) Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 4: 271–280
Steel RGD & Torrie JH (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics (pp 371–372). McGraw-Hill Book Company
Wang, CC, Chu, CC, Sun, CS, Wu, SH, Yin, KC & Xu, C (1973) The androgenesis in wheat (T. aestivum) anthers cultured in vitro. Sci. Sin. 16: 218–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, C.S., Sharma, H.C. & Ohm, H.W. Wheat anther culture: effect of genotype and environmental conditions. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 24, 233–236 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033482
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033482