Skip to main content
Log in

A behavioural proxy model for employee turnover: Results from a Singapore study

  • Articles
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employee turnover has attracted much publicity in Singapore. This research is concerned with (i) building a behavioural model consistent with prior research findings in this area and (ii) testing the model for explanatory power. The research was conducted in a large organisation with 300 subjects taking part in the survey. The model uses behavioural variables: seven variables of personal characteristics, and five factors in the Michigan Job Description Index. The dependent variable is the subject's score, on an interval scale, of intention to leave, which is a proxy for turnover. The findings of this research suggest that the model is able to explain a substantial portion of the variability of turnover intention with R2 at about 35 percent and a significant F-value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein, “Attitude — Behaviour Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research”Pyschological Bulletin 1977, 84, pp. 888–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, “The Statistical Approach to Manpower Planning”The Statistican 1971, 20, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood M., “Work Values and Job Satisfaction”, inJournal of Applied Psychology 1969, pp. 456–459.

  • Bohrnstedt, G., and M. Carter, “Robustness in Regression Analysis” Costner, II. (ED.),Sociological Methodology San Francisco: Josey Bass, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelora R. and J. L. Farr, “Absenteeism, Job involvement and Job Satisfaction in an organisational setting,”Journal of Psychology, 1980, pp. 469–475.

  • Dunham R.B., F.J. Smith, and R.S., Blackburn, “Validation of the Index of Organizational Reactions with JDI, the MSSQ, and Faces Scales” inAcademy of Management Journal 1977, Vol 20 pp. 420–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekpo-Ufot, A., “A Self-Perceived Abilities Relevant in The Task (SPART): A Potential Predictor of Labor Turnover In An Industrial Work Setting”Personnel Psychology 1976, 29, pp. 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federico, J.M., P. Federico, & G.W., Lundquist, “Predicting Women's Turnover As a Function of Extent of Met Salary Expectations and Biodemographic Data,”Personnel Psychology 1976. 29, pp. 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. and S. Ginshburgh, “Job Resignation As A Function of Role Orientation and Leader Acceptance: A Longitudinal Investigation of Organization Assimilation,”Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 1977, 19, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C.L., “Effects of Changes in Job-Satisfaction Levels on Employee Turnover,”Journal of Applied Psychology 1968, 52, pp. 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.O., “Multivariate Analysis of Ordinal Variables,”American Journal of Sociology 1975, 88, pp. 261–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.C., “Personal and Job Factors Affecting Labour Turnover,”Personnel Practice Bulletin 1964, 20, September, pp. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.C., “The Impact of Management Decisions on Labour Turnover,”Personnel Practice Bulletin 1965, 21, December, pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols C.W., “A Validation of Hoppock's Job Satisfaction Measure”Academy of Management Journal, 1978 pp. 737–742.

  • March, J.G., and H.A. Simon,Organizations New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T.N, “Modelling The Turnover Process,”Journal of Management Studies, 1980, Oct, Vol 17.

  • Marsh, R., and H. Mannari, “Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Predictive Study,”Administrative Science Quarterly 1977, 22, pp. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobely, W.H., S.O. Horner, and A.T. Hollingsworth, “An Evaluation of precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover,”Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63, pp. 408–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt, G.W.B., and K. Hill, “Labour Turnover in Australia — A Review of Research, Part I,”Personnel Practice Bulletin 1970, 26, pp. 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.E., “Predicting Absenteeism and Turnover: A Field Comparison of Fishbein's Model and Traditional Job Attitude Measures,”Journal of Applied Psychology 1974, 59, pp. 610–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilley, C.A., and K.H. Roberts, “Job Satisfaction Among Whites and Non-whites: A Cross-cultural Approach,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, pp. 467–473.

  • Steers, R.M., “Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment,”Administrative Science Quarterly 1977, 22, pp. 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Productivity News, National Productivity Board, October 1981.

  • Waters, L.K., D. Roach, and C.W. Waters, “Estimate of Future Tenure, Satisfaction, and Biographicla Variables As Predictors of Termination,”Personnel Psychology 1976, 29, pp. 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author acknowledges the helpful comments of Associate Professor Joseph Putti and the research assistance of Mr Gilbert Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariff, M. A behavioural proxy model for employee turnover: Results from a Singapore study. Asia Pacific J Manage 5, 197–206 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733154

Keywords

Navigation