Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrastructural effects of ulcerogens

  • Part 3: Role of Prostaglandins in Mucosal Cytoprotection in Health and Disease
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agents such as ethanol, aspirin, bile acids, and hypertonic urea and glucose, are capable of breaking the physiological gastric mucosal barrier and may cause ultrastructural injury to the epithelial cells within several minutes of exposure. Ethanol at any pH, and aspirin and bile acids at acid pH, are lipid soluble and diffuse rapidly into surface epithelial cells where a sequence of injury can be documented by electron microscopy. First, the nuclear chromatin becomes clumped and the density of the cytoplasmic ground substance decreases. Second, mitochondria become swollen and the apical cell membrane is distorted. Finally, the apical, cell membrane ruptures and the cell disintegrates. Throughout this sequence, the tight junctions between cells appear morphologically intact. In contrast to lipid soluble agents, hypertonic urea and glucose do not diffuse well into surface epithelial cells. Although these agents also cause rapid changes in transmucosal potential difference and ion fluxes, their ultrastructural effects are quite different. Hypertonic urea and glucose initially cause small blebs within the tight junctions and larger vacuoles within the cytoplasm of surface epithelial cells, while the remainder of the cell structure appears normal. More severe injury is characterized by more vacuolization and eventual disruption of epithelial cells. These changes presumably are secondary to osmotic shifts of fluid and electrolytes. Although the ‘cytoprotective’ effects of prostaglandins have been well described, there is virtually no information at the ultrastructural level concerning the protective effects of prostaglandins with regard to these ulcerogenic agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davenport HW: Ethanol damage to canine oxyntic glandular mucosa. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 126:657–662,1967

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davenport HW: Salicylate damage to the gastric mucosal barrier. N Engl J Med 276:1307–1312, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport HW: Destruction of the, gastric mucosal barrier by detergents and urea. Gastroenterology 54:175–181, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ivey KJ: Gastric mucosal barrier. Gastroenterology 61:247–257, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eastwood GL, Kirchner JP: Changes in the fine structure of mouse gastric epithelium produced by ethanol and urea. Gastroenterology 67:71–84, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eastwood GL: Effect of pH on bile salt injury to mouse gastric mucosa. A light-and electron-microscopic study. Gastroenterology 68:1456–1465, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ito S, Karnovsky MJ: Formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixatives containing trinitro compounds. J Cell Biol 39:168a-169a, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  8. Millonig G: Advantages of a phosphate buffer for OsO4 solutions in fixation. J Appl Physics 32:1637, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hingson DJ, Ito S: Effect of aspirin and related compounds on the fine structure of mouse gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 61:156–177, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baskin WN, Ivey KJ, Krause WJ, Jeffrey GE, Gemmell RT: Aspirin-induced ultrastructural changes in human gastric mucosa. Ann Intern Med 85:299–303, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eastwood GL, Erdmann KR: Effect of ethanol on canine gastric epithelial ultrastructure and transmucosal potential difference. Am J Dig Dis 23:429–435, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lacy ER, Ito S: Ethanol-induced insult to the superficial rat gastric epithelium: A study of damage and rapid repair.In Mechanisms of Mucosal Protection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, A Allen, G, Flemström, A Gardner, W Silen, LA Turnberg (eds). New York. Raven Press, 1984, pp 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  13. DiBona DR, Civan MM: Anatomic site of osmoticallyinduced conductance changes in toad urinary bladder. Fed Proc 31:279, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wade JB, Revel JP, DiScala VA: Effect of osmotic gradient on intercellular junctions of the toad bladder. Am J Physiol 224:407–415, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Davis JP, Field SO, Hanchar AJ: Mild irritants prevent gastric necrosis through “adaptive cytoprotection” mediated by prostagladins. Am J Physiol 245:G113-G121, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller T: Protective effects of prostaglandins against gastric mucosal damage: Current knowledge and proposed mechanisms. Am J Physiol 245:G601-G623, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferguson WW, Edmonds AW, Starling JR, Wangensteen SL: Protective effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on lysosomal enzyme release in serotonin-induced gastric ulceration. Ann Surg 177:648–654, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aures D, Tallos JA, Gerwer AS, Guth PH: Effect of prostaglandin E2 on aspirin-induced lysosomal membrane labilization. Gastroenterology 82:1011, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  19. Terano A, Mach T, Stachura J, Tarnawski A, Ivey KJ: Effect of 16, 16 dimethyl prostaglandin E2 on aspirin induced damage to rat gastric epithelial cells in tissue culture. Gut 25:19–25, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lacy ER, Ito S: Microscopic analysis of ethanol damage to rat gastric mucosa after treatment with a prostaglandin. Gastroenterology 83:619–625, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guth PH, Paulsen G, Nagata H: Prostaglandin cytoprotection: Effect on histologic and microcirculatory changes in alcohol-induced gastric mucosal injury.In Mechanisms of Mucosal Protection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract A Allen, G Flemström, A Garner, W Silen, LA Turnberg (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1984, pp 285–286

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ohtsuki H, Yamamoto O, Okabe S: Scanning electron microscopic studies of cytoprotection by 16-DMPGE2 on indomethacin-induced gastric and intestinal lesions in rats.In Mechanisms of Mucosal Protection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, A Allen, G Flemström, A Garner, W Silen, LA Turnberg (eds). New York, Raven, Press, 1984, pp 371–376

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marrone G, Ito S, Silen W: Prostaglandins fail to prevent acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) induced injury of the isolated amphibian gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 84:1241, 1983

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eastwood, G.L. Ultrastructural effects of ulcerogens. Digest Dis Sci 30 (Suppl 11), 95S–104S (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309392

Keywords

Navigation