Skip to main content
Log in

Trophectoderm microbiopsy in murine blastocysts: Comparison of four methods

  • Animal Investigations
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Purpose

This study compares four trophectoderm microbiopsy techniques for removal of blastomeres from murine blastocysts: (1) aspiration,trophectoderm pipetted through the zona; (2) incision,trophectoderm excised with a microrazor; (3) slit/excision,the zona slit and herniating trophectoderm excised; and (4) hatch/excision,trophectoderm cells excised after spontaneous hatching.

Results

Murine blastocysts were comparatively biopsied using one of four methods and contrasted to zona slit and nonmicromanipulated controls. Operative cellular injury was assessed by uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Postoperative embryonic viability was assessed by blastocoele reexpansion and hatching inner cell mass development and trophectoderm plating. All techniques yielded cells available for genetic analysis.

Conclusions

The slit/excision technique and hatch/excision techniques exhibited lower operative injury and the higher postoperative viability than aspiration or incision. The slit/excision and the hatch/excision techniques, though requiring two operative steps, appear to be the least damaging of the four methods. Therefore, they should be most applicable to human blastocysts obtained either by extended culture in vitro or by uterine lavage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Handyside AH, Lesko JG, Tarim JJ, Winston RML, Hughes MR: Birth of a normal girl following preimplantation diagnosis for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1992;327:905–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RML: Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thatcher SS, DeCherney AH: A critical assessment of the indications for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1989;4:11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton VN, Wren ME, Parsons JH: Pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and transfer of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 1991;55:830–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buster JE, Bustillo M, Rodi IA, Cohen SW, Hamilton F, Simon JA, Throneycroft IA, Marshall JR: Biologic and morphologic development of donated human ova recovered by nonsurgical uterine lavage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:211–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RML: The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development 1989;107:597–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Ross C, Gardner RL, Barlow DH: Trophectoderm biopsy in human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1990;5:821–825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwok S, Higuichi R: Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 1989;339:237–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boehnke M, Arnhem N, Li H, Collins FS: Fine structure genetic mapping of human chromosomes using the polymerase chain reaction on single sperm: Experimental design considerations. Am J Hum Genet 1989;45:21–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozil JP: Production of identical twins by bisection of blastocysts in the cow. J Reprod Fertil 1983;69:463–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang X, Foot RH: Production of identical twin rabbits by micromanipulation of embryos. Biol Reprod 1987;37:1007–1014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monk M, Muggleton-Harris AL, Rawlings E, Whittingham DG: Pre-implantation diagnosis of HPRT-deficient male and carrier female mouse embryos by trophectoderm biopsy. Hum Reprod 1988;3:337–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Gardner RL, Barlow DH: Human trophectoderm biopsy and secretion of chorionic gonadotrophin. Hum Reprod 1991;61:1453–1459

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gomez CM, Muggleton-Harris AL, Whittingham DG, Hood LE, Readhead C: Rapid preimplantation detection of mutant (shiverer) and normal alleles of the mouse myel in basic protein gene allowing selective implantation and birth of live young. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:4481–4484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilton LJ, Shaw JM, Trounson AO: Successful single-cell biopsy and cryopreservation of preimplantation mouse embryos. Fertil Steril 1989;51:513–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roudebush WE, Kim JG, Minhas BS, Dodson MG: Survival and cell acquisition rates after preimplantation embryo biopsy: Use of two mechanical techniques and two mouse strains. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1084–1090

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carson, S.A., Gentry, W.L., Smith, A.L. et al. Trophectoderm microbiopsy in murine blastocysts: Comparison of four methods. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 427–433 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228093

Key words

Navigation