Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging by a Generalist Grasshopper: The Distance Between Food Resources Influences Diet Mixing and Growth Rate (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The grasshopper, Schistocerca americana, grew better on a mixture of cotton and kale than on either alone. When the two foods were placed in close proximity, growth rates were similar among individuals, but when they were 20 cm apart growth rates were extremely variable among individuals. Behavioral analyses showed that distance influenced the dietary mixing behavior of individuals. Foods close together were sampled more often and there were more meals that included both food types. When foods were distant, individuals tended to stay for relatively long periods at one or the other; when on cotton, this resulted in more feeding on cotton, which was an inferior food. Individuals varied in the extent to which they were constrained by the distance between the two foods. Those that moved between the foods less and therefore mixed less seemed to grow less well, suggesting the possibility of a trade-off between active foraging and behavior associated with predator avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barnes, O. L. (1955). Effects of food plants on the lesser migratory grasshopper. J. Econ. Entomol. 48: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., and Bright, K. L. (1993). Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: A review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 104A: 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., and Raubenheimer, D. (1991). Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: Changes in acceptability of different plant secondary compounds associated with low levels of dietary protein. J. Insect Behav. 4: 545–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., Bright, K. L., Howard, J. J., Raubenheimer, D., and Champagne, D. (1992). Variety is the spice of life: Frequent switching between foods in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques Burmeister (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Anim. Behav. 44: 721–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., Bright, K. L., Gonzalez, N., and Angel, J. E. (1994). Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: Tests of two hypotheses. Ecology 75: 1997–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P., Simpson, S. J., and Raubenheimer, D. (1995). Behavioural mechanisms of nutrient balancing in Locusta migratoria nymphs. Anim. Behav. 50: 1513–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P., Sword, G., Angel, J. E., Behmer, S., and Bernays, E. A. (1996). Foraging by generalist grasshoppers: Two different strategies. Anim. Behav. 52: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, D., and Bernays, E. A. (1991). The importance of an inadequate sterol profile in food aversion learning in grasshoppers. Physiol. Entomol. 16: 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. F., and Sword, G. A. (1994). The relationship between plant acceptability and suitability for survival and development of the polyphagous grasshopper, Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Insect Behav. 7: 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, W. J. (1975). Feeding behaviour of the Australian acridid Valanga irregularis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 18: 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, W. J., Calcott, P. H., and Anderson, L. R. (1985). Tannins and saponin: Interaction in herbivore diets. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 13: 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, C. (1933). Growth and nutrition of Melanoplus differentialis. 1. Growth on a satisfactory mixed diet and on diets of single food plants. Physiol. Zool. 6: 306–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, T. (1965). Biological studies on some Bavarian Acridoidea (Orthoptera) with special reference to their feeding habits. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58: 791–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S. L., and Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. H., and Thorsteinson, A. J. (1980). Development and survival of the twostriped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), on various single and multiple plant diets. Acrida 9: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noldus, L. P. J. J. (1991). The Observer: A software system for collection and analysis of observational data. Behav. Res. Meth. Instr. Comput. 23: 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfadt, R. E. (1949). Food plants as factors in the ecology of the lesser migratory grasshopper Melanoplus mexicanus. Bull. Wy. Expt. Stat. No. 290.

  • Pickford, R. (1962). Development, survival and reproduction of Melanoplus bilituratus reared on various food plants. Can. Entomol. 94: 859–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, D., and Bernays, E. A. (1993). Feeding patterns and dietary mixing in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques: A field study. Anim. Behav. 45: 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1993). Effects of ecological interactions on forager diets: Competition, predation risk, parasitism and prey behaviour. In Hughes, R. N. (ed.), Diet Selection: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Foraging Behaviour, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 182–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. J. (1990). The pattern of feeding. In Chapman, R. F., and Joern, A. (eds.), Biology of Grasshoppers, Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Clark, A. B., Coleman, K., and Dearstyne, T. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. TREE 9: 442–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernays, E.A., Angel, J.E. & Augner, M. Foraging by a Generalist Grasshopper: The Distance Between Food Resources Influences Diet Mixing and Growth Rate (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 829–840 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000010416.54387.44

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000010416.54387.44

Navigation