Skip to main content
Log in

Software for health care analysts: A modular approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The many concerns about the cost and quality of health care suggest the need to facilitate planners' using existing data bases for utilization review, program evaluation, and technology assessment. Despite both the availability of relevant data and widespread improvements in computing power, integrated computer software to permit analyses by nonspecialists has not previously been developed. This paper discusses the features of a health policy information system which aids working with hospital discharge abstracts, medical claims, cancer registries, and vital statistics files. Analyses of small area utilization, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and readmissions are facilitated by this package. This information system, named the Health Applications System, includes an analysis module, three information management modules, and a set of record linkage modules. The modules were developed using the macroprocessor in the fourth-generation SAS system. Features of the software and their implications for data analysis are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunt, A.T., Morrison, P.R., and Pagano, M., The effects of computer science advancements on public health research.Annu. Rev. Public Health 6:325, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harel, E.C., and McLean, E.R., The effects of using a nonprocedural computer language on programmer productivity.MIS Quart. 75:1288, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fetter, R.B., and Freeman, J.L., Diagnosis related groups: Product line management within hospitals.Acad. Manage. Rev. 11:41, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knickman, J.R., and Foltz, A.M., A statistical analysis of reasons for east-west differences in hospital use.Inquiry 22:45, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roos, L.L., Cageorge, S.M., Austen, E., and Lohr, K.N., Using computers to identify complications after surgery.Am. J. Public Health 75:1288, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wennberg, J.E., and McPherson, K., Caper., Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs?N. Engl. J. Med. 311:295, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caper, P., Variations in medical practice: Implications for health policy.Health Affairs 3(2):110, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roos, N.P., and Roos, L.L., High and low surgical rates: Risk factors for area residents.Am. J. Public Health 71:591, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jencks, S.F., and Dobson, A., Strategies for reforming Medicare's physician payments: Physician diagnosis-related groups and other approaches.N. Engl. J. Med. 312:1492, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes, B.A., O'Brien, E., Comstock, C., D'Arpa, D.G., and Donahue, C.L., Report on variation in rates of utilization of surgical services in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.JAMA 2534:371, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roos, L.L., and Payne, H., Health care evaluation in a government agency: goals, organization, and software.Can. J. Prog. Eval. 2:9, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. White, J.K., Variations in medical practice.Health Affairs 3(4):145, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luft, H.S., Bunker, J.P., and Enthoven, A.C., Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.N. Engl. J. Med. 301:1364, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riley, G, and Lubitz, J., Outcomes of surgery in the Medicare aged populations: mortality after surgery.Health Care Fin. Rev. 6:103, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wennberg, J.E., Roos, N.P., Sola, L., Schori, A., and Jaffe, R., Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes: Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy.JAMA 257:933, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aaron, H.J., Commentary: Prospective payment: The next big policy disappointment.Health Affairs 3(3):102, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hellinger, F.J., Recent evidence on case-based systems for setting hospital rates.Inquiry 22:78, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman, J.L., Fetter, R.B., and Newbold, R.C., Hospital utilization before and after the implementation of DRGs for hospital payment: U.S., 1979 to 1984.J. Manage. Med. 1:309, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosko, M.D., and Broyles, R.W., The impact of the New Jersey all-payer DRG system.Inquiry 23:67, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McPherson, K., Strong, P.M., Epstein, A., and Jones, L., Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: Within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America.Soc. Sci. Med. 15a:273, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mossey, J.M., and Roos, L.L., Using insurance claims to measure health status: the illness scale.J. Chronic Dis. 40:41, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roos, N.P., Roos, L.L., Mossey, J.M., and Havens, B.J., Using administrative data to predict important health outcomes: entry to hospital, nursing home, and death. Med Care 1988; forthcoming.

  23. Smith, M.E., Record linkage: Present status and methodology.J. Clin. Comput. 13:52, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Newcombe, H.B., Smith, M.E., and Abbatt, J.D., Linkage procedures for the Eldorado mortality searches—ENL—LINK—2. Eldorado Resources Limited, Ottawa, Ontario, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newcombe, H.B., Smith, M.E., Howe, G.R., Mingay, J., Stungnell, A., and Abbatt, J.D., Reliability of computerized versus manual death searches in a study of the health of Eldorado uranium workers.Comput. Biol. Med. 13:157, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roos, L.L., Wajda, A., Nicol, J.P., The art and science of record linkage: Methods that work with few identifiers.Comput. Biol. Med. 16:45, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harris, L.R., Natural language front ends. (Winston, P.H., and Pendergast, K.A., eds),The AI Press: Commercial Uses of Artificial Intelligence MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roos, L.L., Cageorge, S.M., Austen, E., and Lohr, K.N., Using computers to identify complications after surgery.Am. J. Public Health 75:1288, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Winston, P.H., and Pendergast, K.A. (eds).The AI Business: Commercial Uses of Artificial Intelligence MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Committee for Evaluating Medical Technologies in Clinical Use. Institute of Medicine, Assessing Medical Technologies, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1985.

  31. Feinleib, M., Data bases, data banks and data dredging: The agony and the ecstasy.J. Chronic Dis. 37:783, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sackett, D.L., Basic research, clinical research, clinical epidemiology, and general internal medicine.J. Gen. Int. Med. 2:40, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bunker, J.P., Roos, L.L., Fowles, J., and Roos, N.P., Information systems and routine monitoring in the United States and Canada—with examples from surgical practice. (Holland, W.W., Detels, R., and Knox, G. eds.).Oxford Textbook of Public Health, Volume 3: Investigative Methods in Public Health Oxford University Press, New York, 77–86, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Detmer, D.E., and Firsch, C., Improved results in acute appendicitis care following areawide review.Med. Decis. Making 4:217, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roos, L.L., Wajda, A., Sharp, S.M. et al. Software for health care analysts: A modular approach. J Med Syst 11, 445–464 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993011

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993011

Keywords

Navigation