Skip to main content
Log in

Design of sparse matrix representations for the propagator used in the BPM and directional wave field decomposition

  • Published:
Optical and Quantum Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Directional wave field decomposition can be accomplished with the aid of pseudo-differential operators. A fast numerical scheme requires sparse matrix representations of these operators. This paper focuses on designing sparse matrices for the propagator while keeping the accuracy high at the cost of ignoring critical-angle phenomena. The matrix representation follows from a rational approximation for the square root operator and the derivatives. The parameterization thus introduced lends itself to an overall optimization procedure that minimizes the errors for a chosen discretization rate. As such, the approach leads to an accurate propagator up to the (local) critical angle on a coarse numerical grid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. V. De Hoop, J. Math Phys. 37 (1996) 3246.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. F. Fleck, J. R. Morris and M. D. Feit, Appl. Phys. 10 (1976) 129.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Gerdes and R. Pregla, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 (1991) 389.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Baets, J. Willems and J. Haes, in, ECIO (1993) 13.1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Hadley, Opt. Lett. 17 (1992) 1426.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. J. W. M. Hoekstra, G. J. M. Krijnen and P. V. Lambeck, Opt. Commun. 97 (1993) 301.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. J. W. M. Hoekstra, Opt. Quantum Electron. 29 (1997) 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Lee and A. D. Pierce, J. Comp. Acoust. 2 (1995) 95.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fishman and J. J. McCoy, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 22 (1984) 682.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kaczmarski and P. E. Lagasse, Electron. Lett. 24 (1988) 675.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H.-H. Lin and A. Korpel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 (1991)849.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. J. N. Van Stralen and H. Blok, Internal Report: Et/EM 1995–18 (TU Delft, available on request) (1995).

  13. E. Anderson, Z. Bai and C. Bischof, LAPACK Users' Guide (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992).

  14. C. Dewitt-Morette, A. Maheshwari and B. Nelson, Phys. Rep. 50 (1979) 255.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Schoenberg and F. Muir, Geophysics 54 (1989) 581.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. V. De Hoop and A. T. De Hoop, Wave Motion 15 (1992) 229.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. The NAG FORTRAN Library Manual Mark 15 (NAG Ltd, 1991).

  18. A. R. Mitchell and D. F. Griffiths, The Finite Difference Method in Partial Differential Equations (John Wiley, 1980).

  19. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, 1986).

  20. Y. Arai, A. Maruta and M. Matsuhara, Opt. Lett. 8 (1993) 765.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. R. Hadley, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28 (1992) 363.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. O. Martin, A. Dereux and C. Girard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11 (1994) 1073.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stralen, M.J.N.V., Blok, H. & Hoop, M.V.D. Design of sparse matrix representations for the propagator used in the BPM and directional wave field decomposition. Optical and Quantum Electronics 29, 179–197 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018554105794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018554105794

Keywords

Navigation