Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Stereoselective Pharmacokinetics in the Development and Predictability of an IVIVC for the Enantiomers of Metoprolol Tartrate

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the ability of an IVIVC developedwith a racemate drug as well as each enantiomer in predicting the invivo enantiomer drug performance.

Methods. Dissolution of metoprolol extended releasetablets with different release characteristics (e.g., fast (F),moderate (M), and slow (S)) was performed using USP ApparatusI, pH 1.2, 50 rpm. Metoprolol racemate tablets (S, M, and F, 100 mg) and 50mg oral solution were administered to healthy volunteers, blood samples werecollected over 24 (solution) and 48 (tablet) hours and assayed. IVIVC modelsdeveloped were: (1) Racemate-fraction of drug dissolved (FRD) vsRacemate-fraction of drug absorbed (FRA), (2) R-FRD vs R-FRA, and (3) S-FRDvs S-FRA for combinations of formulations (S/M/F, S/M, S/F, and M/F).Enantiomer Cmax and AUC prediction errors (PEs) were estimated for modelevaluation after convolution of in vivo release rates.

Results. The R-IVIVC and S-IVIVC accurately predicted theR- and S-metoprolol pharmacokinetic profiles, respectively. The averagedprediciton errors (PE) for the enantiomer Cmax and AUC were less than10% for S/M/F, M/F, and S/F IVIVC models. Racemate-IVIVC (M/F) wasable to predict S-enantiomer with an average %PE of 2.52 for S-Cmaxand 4.3 for S-AUC. However, the racemate-IVIVC was unable to predict theR-enantiomer pharmacokinetic profile.

Conclusions. Metoprolol racemate data cannot be used toaccurately predict R-enantiomer drug concentrations. However, the racematedata was predictive of the active stereoisomer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Form Guidance: Scale-up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls, In Vitro Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation Research (CDER), September 1997.

  2. Guidance for Industry: Extended Release Solid Oral Dosage Form: Development, Evaluation and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation Research (CDER), September 1997.

  3. G. T. Tucker and M. S. Lennard. Enantiomer specific pharmacokinetics. Pharmacol. Ther. 45:309–329 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Sandberg, B. Abrahamsson, and C. G. Regardh. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol enantiomers after administration of racemate and the S-enantiomer as oral solution and extended release tablets. Drug Invest. 6:320–329 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Williams and E. Lee. Importance of drug enantiomers in clinical pharmacology. Drugs 30:333–354 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Y. Aboul-Enein and I. W. Wainer. The impact of stereochemistry on drug development and use. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, INC. 1997

  7. M. Vakily and F. Jamali. Human Pharmacokinetics of tiaprofenic acid after regular sustained release formulation: Lack of chiral inversion and stereoselective release. J. Pharm. Sci. 83:495–498 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. E. Drayer. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokenetic differences between drug enantiomers in human: An overview. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 40:125–132 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. D. Eddington, P. Marroum, R. Uppoor, A. S. Hussain, and L. L. Augsburger. Development and internal validation of an in vitro in vivo correlation for a hydrophilic metoprolol tartrate extended release tablet formulation. Pharm. Res. 15:466–473 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. V. Nellore, G. S. Rekhib, A. S. Hussain, L. G. Tillman, H. J. Malinowski, and L. L. Augsburger. Development of metoprolol tartrate extended-release matrix tablet formulations for regulatory policy consideration. J. Controlled Rel. 50:247–256 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. USP XXIII chapter 〈1088〉, United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.; Rockville, Maryland, pp. 1927¶ 1929.

  12. B. Mistry, J. Leslie, and N. D. Eddington. A sensitive assay of metoprolol and its major metabolite α-hydroxy metoprolol in human plasma and determination of dextromethorphan and its metabolite dexthorphan in urine with high performance liquid chromatography and fluorometric detection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 16:1041–1049(1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Mistry, J. Wright, J. Leslie, and N. D. Eddington. Direct enantioselective and sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic assay of metoprolol and its two major metabolites in human plasma using chirobiotic T column. Pharm. Res. 14:S685, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. W. Moore and H. H. Flanner. Mathematical comparison of curves with an emphasis on dissolution profiles. Pharm Tech. 6:64–74 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. S. Lennard, G. T. Tucker, J. H. Silas, S. Freestone, L. E. Ramsay, and H. F. Woods. Differential stereoselective metabolism of metoprolol in extensive and poor debrisoquin metabolizers. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 34:732–737 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sirisuth, N., Eddington, N.D. Influence of Stereoselective Pharmacokinetics in the Development and Predictability of an IVIVC for the Enantiomers of Metoprolol Tartrate. Pharm Res 17, 1019–1025 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007595725360

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007595725360

Navigation