Abstract
Legal constraints upon therapeutic flexibility, resulting in breaches of confidentiality, can promote counterproductive effects upon patients and society. Conflicts can be created for mental health professionals who sometimes must choose between maximum self-protection and doing what they believe is ethical. A survey of forensic psychiatrists indicated that most believe they face ethical problems created by some ambiguities in current reporting statutes if they are interpreted to mandate reporting and warning. Emphasis is given: (1) to the ethical choice faced by therapists as to whether rigidly to report and warn to limit liability in all Tarasoff-type situations and in some ambiguous child abuse situations, or to take an alternative action when it is clinically indicated for the benefit of a patient and/or society; (2) to the importance of understanding the distinction between potential criminal liability for failure to report under many child abuse laws, and the risk only of civil liability in Tarasoff-type cases; and (3) to appreciate the flexibility permitted by current “Tarasoff” laws. Our case histories demonstrate that mandated erosion of therapeutic confidentiality can present serious problems for patients and others. Suggestions are included for modifications in the current reporting statutes, focusing on the perspective that clinical flexibility is an essential adjunct to community protection as well as to effective therapy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Cal. Penal Code, Sections 11165–11174, 1980.
Coulter J, Speaker, Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Diego, Feb. 1987.
Beck J, Ed:The Potentially Violent Patient and the Tarasoff Decision in Psychiatric Practice. Washington, D.C.; American Psychiatric Press, 1985.
Kempe CH, Silverman F, Steele B, Droegenmueller WW, Silber H: The battered child syndrome.JAMA 181: 17–24, 1962.
Weinstock R, Weinstock D: Child abuse reporting trends: an unprecedented threat to confidentiality.Journal of Forensic Sciences 33: 418–431, 1988.
Opinions of the Ethics Committee on the Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C., 1985.
Ziskind, K: Adult abuse victim, informal opinion by the California Attorney General's Office, February 1987.
Tennick L: Review of Crewdson J, By silence betrayed, the sexual abuse of children in America,Los Angeles Times, January 31, 1988.
In re Lifschutz, 2 Cal. 3d 415, 85 Cal. Rptr 829, 467 Pac. 2d 557 (1970)
Caesar v Mountanos, 542 F. 2d 1064 (9th Cir, 1976)
Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 529 P.2d 553 (1974).
Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (1976).
Appelbaum PS: Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect.American Journal of Psychiatry 142: 425–429, 1985.
Carlson R, Friedman L, Riggert S: The duty to warn/protect: issues in clinical practice.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 15: 179–186, 1987.
Appelbaum PS: The expansion of liability for patients' violent acts.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 35: 13–13, 1984.
Mills M: The so-called duty to warn: the psychotherapeutic duty to protect third parties for patients' violent acts.Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2: 237–257, 1984.
Rachlin S, Schwartz H: Unforseeable liability for patients' violent acts.Hospital Community Psychiatry 37: 725–731, 1986.
Stone A: The Tarasoff case and some of its progeny: suing psychotherapists to safeguard society, in Stone A, Ed.Law, Psychiatry and Morality. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1984, pp 133–160.
California Assembly Bill 1133, McAllister, 1984 California Civil Code Section 43.92 effective January 1, 1986.
Mills M, Sullivan G, Eth S: Protecting third parties: a decade after Tarasoff.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144: 68–74, 1987.
Weinstock R: Controversial ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: a survey.Journal of Forensic Sciences 33: 176–186, 1988.
Weinstock R: Confidentiality and the new duty to protect: the therapist's dilemma.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39: 607–609, 1988.
Miller RD, Weinstock R: Conflict of interest between therapist-patient confidentiality and the duty to report sexual abuse of children.Behavioral Science and the Law 5: 161–174, 1987.
Kelly R: Limited confidentiality and the pedophile.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 38: 1046–1048, 1987.
Pellegrino E: Altruism, self-interest, and medical ethics.JAMA 258: 1939–1940, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstock, R., Weinstock, D. Clinical flexibility and confidentiality: Effects of reporting laws. Psych Quart 60, 195–214 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064796
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064796