Skip to main content
Log in

Paired comparisons with individual differences

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of Bradley-Terry type for paired comparisons is considered. In addition to the usual parameters, the model allows for individual parameters and corresponding parameters for the choice-alternatives. The model is applied to a set of data from a Danish investigation of the attitude of blue collar workers towards alternative social gains. The proposed model is finally compared to a model recently suggested by Schönemann and Wang.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. B. Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 1970,32, 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. Conditional inference and models for measuring. Copenhagen: Mentalhygiejnisk Forlag, 1973a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1973b,26, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. Incomplete block rank analysis: On the appropriateness of the model for a method of paired comparisons.Biometrics, 1954a,10, 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs II. Additional tables for the method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1954b,11, 502–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs III. Some large sample results on estimation and power for a method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1955,42, 450–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs I. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952,39, 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. Some latent trait models. In F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick,Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R.Analysis of binary data. London: Methuen and Co., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A.The method of paired comparisons. New York: Haffner, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kousgard, N. Models for paired comparisons with ties.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1976,1, (in press).

  • Lehmann, E. L.Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: J. Wiley and Sons, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D.Individual choice behavior. New York: J. Wiley and Sons, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neymann, J. and Scott, E. L. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations.Econometrika, 1948,16, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfanzagl, J.Theory of measurement. New York: J. Wiley and Sons, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology.Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory, 1961,5, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. An item analysis which takes individual differences into account.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966,19, 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H. and Wang, M. M. An individual model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data.Psychometrika, 1972,37, 275–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixtl, F. Probabilistic unfolding.Psychometrika, 1973,38, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, E.B. Paired comparisons with individual differences. Psychometrika 41, 141–157 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291835

Key words

Navigation