Skip to main content
Log in

Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparison was made of the type and frequency of mutational events found in the progeny of tomato plants regenerated after one passage in vitro with those induced by chemical mutagenesis with ethyl methane sulphonate. Several mutants were recovered in the progeny of regenerated and mutagenized plants of two cultivars of tomato. They can be grouped into the following categories: seedling lethality, male sterility, resistance to Verticillium, short stature, change in number of lateral shoots or in leaf shape. The results indicate that the two sources of variability differ in their effect, changing the spectrum and frequency of the mutants as well as, at least in some cases, their pattern of segregation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender CG, Shoemaker PB (1984) Prevalence of Verticillium wilt of tomato and avirulence of Verticillium dahliae race 1 and race 2 isolates in Western North Carolina. Plant Dis 68:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiatti M, Marcheschi G, Tognoni F, Collina Grenci F, Martini G (1985) Genetic variability induced by tissue culture in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). J Plant Breed 94:162–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirulli M, Ciccarese F (1982) Factors affecting early screening of tomatoes for monogenic and poligenic resistance to Fusarium wilt. Crop Protect 1:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Sharp WR (1983) Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture. Science 221:949–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Sharp WR (1986) Applications of somaclonal variation. Biotechnology 4:528–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Sharp WR, Medina-Filho HP (1984) Somaclonal and gametoclonal variations. Am J Bot 71:759–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox JL (1986) Embracing somaclonal variation for agricultural biotechnology. ASM News 52:196–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey RS, Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne ssp, including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep 57:1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvi AJ, Eslick RF (1975) Shrunken endosperm mutants in barley. Crop Sci 15:363–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsmann J, Uhrig H (1985) Somaclonal variation in Solanum tuberosum detected at the molecular level. Theor Appl Genet 71:500–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PI, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PI, Ryan SA, Brettel RIS, Scowcroft WR (1984) Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 67:443–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog R (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oono K (1985) Putative homozigous mutations in regenerated plants of rice. Mol Gen Genet 198:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcifull DE, Batchelor DL (1977) Immunodiffusion tests with sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) treated plant viruses and plant viral inclusions. Tech Bull Fl Agric Exp Stn 788:39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Zong-xin, Zhao Cheng-zhang, Zheng Kang-le, Qi Xiu-fan, Fu Ya-pin (1983) Somaclonal genetics of rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor Appl Genet 67:67–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Salamini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gavazzi, G., Tonelli, C., Todesco, G. et al. Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 74, 733–738 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247550

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247550

Key words

Navigation