Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of parental divergence on F2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the development of a methodology to estimate genetic divergence between parental lines, when combined with knowledge of parental performance, could be beneficial in the prediction of bulk progeny performance. The objective of this study was to relate F2 heterosis for grain yield and its components in 116 crosses to two independent estimates of genetic divergence among 28 parental genotypes of diverse origins. Genetic divergence between parents was estimated from (a) pedigree relationships (coefficients of kinship) determined without experimentation, and (b) quantitative traits measured in two years of field experimentation in Kansas and North Carolina, USA. These distances, designated (1 -r) and G, respectively, provided ample differentiation among the parents. The 116 F2 bulks were evaluated at four locations in Kansas and North Carolina in one year. Significant rank correlations of 0.46 (P = 0.01) and 0.44 (P = 0.01) were observed between G and grain yield and kernel number heterosis, respectively. Although (1 -r) was poorly associated with grain yield heterosis, G and midparent performance combined to account for 50% of the variation in F2 yields among crosses when (1 -r) was above the median value, whereas they accounted for only 9% of the variation among crosses when (1-r) was below the median. Midparent and (1 -r) had equal effects on F2 grain yield (R 2= 0.40) when G was greater than the median value. A breeding strategy is proposed whereby parents are first selected on the basis of performance per se and, subsequently, crosses are made between genetically divergent parents that have both large quantitative (G) and pedigree divergence (1 -r).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arunachalam V, Bandyopadhyay A, Nigam SN, Gibbons RW (1984) Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 3:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch RH, Janke JC, Frohberg RC (1974) Evaluation of crosses among high and low yielding parents of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and bulk prediction of line performance. Crop Sci 14:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes T, Goodman MM, Casas E, Rawlings JO (1978) Use of genetic effects and genotype by environmental interactions for the classification of Mexican races of maize. Genetics 90:339–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen NM, Frey KJ (1987a) Relationships between three measures of genetic distance and breeding hehavior in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome 29:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen NM, Frey KJ (1987b) Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.) Euphytica 36:413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox TS, Murphy JP, Rodgers DM (1986) Changes in genetic diversity in the red winter wheat regions of the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5583–5586

    Google Scholar 

  • Cregan PB, Busch RH (1977) Early generation bulk hybrid yield testing of adapted hard red spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci 17:887–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Cregan PB, Bush RH (1978) Heterosis, inbreeding, and line performance in crosses of adapted spring wheats. Crop Sci 18:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress CE (1966) Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi A, Adams MW, Nassib AM (1984) Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in dry edible bean and faba bean. Crop Sci 24:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MM (1972) Distance analysis in biology. Syst Zool 21:174–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson WD, Casas E (1968) Spatial relationship among eight populations Zea mays L. utilizing information from a diallel mating design. Biometrics 24:867–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Isleib TG, Wynne JC (1983) Heterosis in testcrosses of 27 exotic peanut cultivars. Crop Sci 23:832–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Jatasra DS, Paroda RS (1983) Genetic divergence in wheat. Indian J Genet 43:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks JL (1983) Biometrical genetics of heterosis. In: Frankel R (ed) Heterosis. Reappraisal of theory and practice. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin New York pp 1–46 (Monographs on the-oretical and applied genetics 6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson M, Guillot-Lemoine B, Dattee Y (1986) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Use of different indicators of genetic divergence in a 7 × 7 diallel. Agronomie 6:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson M, Dattee Y, Guillot-Lemoine B (1987) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): Use of kinship coefficient. Genome 29:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 2:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l'hérédité. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluf WR, Ferreira PE, Miranda JEC (1983) Genetic divergence in tomatoes and its relationship with heterosis for yield in F1 hybrids. Rev Brasil Genet 6:453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon RB, Wenninger G (1970) The dendograph. State Geological Survey, University of Kansas Computer Contr. No. 38, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JP, Cox TS, Rodgers DM (1986) Cluster analysis of red winter wheat cultivars based upon coefficents of parentage. Crop Sci 26:672–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam S, Tiwari AS, Mehra RB (1974) Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in mung bean. Theor Appl Genet 45:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuddin AKM (1985) Genetic diversity in relation to heterosis and combining ability in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet 70:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. The Iowa State Univ Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza EJ (1988) Measures and applications of genetic relationships in oats. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca/ NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Paper No. 12162 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7643, and Contribution No. 89-396-J of the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, KS 66506

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, T.S., Murphy, J.P. The effect of parental divergence on F2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 241–250 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225958

Key words

Navigation