Skip to main content
Log in

Limitation of life support: Frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the frequency of limiting (withdrawing and withholding) therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU), the grounds for limiting therapy, the people involved in the decisions, the way the decisions are implemented and the patient outcome.

Design

Prospective survey. Ethical approval was obtained.

Setting

ICUs in tertiary centres in London and Cape Town.

Patients

All patients who died or had life support limited.

Interventions

Data collection only.

Results

There were 65 deaths out of 945 ICU discharges in London and 45 deaths out of 354 ICU discharges in Cape Town. Therapy was limited in 81.5% and 86.7% respectively (p=0.6) of patients who died. The mean ages of patients whose therapy was limited were 60.2 years and 51.9 years (p=0.014) and mean APACHE II scores 18.5 and 22.6 (p=0.19) respectively. The most common reason for limiting therapy in both centres was multiple organ failure. Both medical and nursing staff were involved in most decisions, which were only implemented once wide consensus had been reached and the families had accepted the situation. Inotropes, ventilation, blood products, and antibiotics were most commonly withdrawn. The mean time from admission to the decision to limit therapy was 11.2 days in London and 9.6 days in Cape Twon. The times to outcome (death in all patients) were 13.2 h and 8.1 h respectively.

Conclusions

Withdrawal of therapy occurred commonly, most often because of multiple organ failure. Wide consensus was reached before a decision was made, and the time to death was generally short.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS et al (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Sharpe SM et al (1986) The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units. JAMA 255:351–356

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daffurn K, Kerridge R, Hillman KM (1992) Active management of the dying patient. Med J Aust 157:701–704

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent JL (1990) European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 16:256–264

    Google Scholar 

  5. Society of Critical Care Medicine ethics committee (1992) Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med 20: 320–326

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wood GG, Martin E (1995) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth 42:186–191

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Thoracic Society (1991) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:726–731

    Google Scholar 

  8. ACCP/SCCM consensus panel (1990) Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation, and withdrawal of intensive care. Chest 97:949–961

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benatar SR, Abels C, Abratt R et al (1994) Statement on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. S Afr Med J 84:254–256

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne ML (1992) Physician decisions regarding life support in the intensive care unit. Chest 101:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luce JM, Raffin TA (1988) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. Chest 94:621–626

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher MM, Raper RF (1990) Withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care. Parts 1–3. Med J Aust 153:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wanzer SH, Federman DD, Adelstein SJ et al (1989) The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill, patients. A second look. N Engl J Med 320:844–849

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meisel A (1991) Legal myths about terminating life support. Arch Intern Med 151:1497–1502

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teres D (1993) Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 19: 316–322

    Google Scholar 

  16. Task force on ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (1990) Crit Care Med 18:1435–1439

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pallis C (1983) ABC of brain stem death. BMJ Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levy DE, Bates D, Caronna JJ et al (1981) Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. Ann Intern Med 94:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al (1985) Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 202:685–693

    Google Scholar 

  20. Faber-Langendoen K, Bartels DM (1992) Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study. Crit Care Med 20:570–577

    Google Scholar 

  21. Orentlicher D (1992) The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions. JAMA 267:2101–2104

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emmanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoekle JD et al (1994) Advance directives for medical care: a case for greater use. N Engl J Med 324:889–895

    Google Scholar 

  23. Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ, Stoeckle JD et al (1994) Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choices. Arch Intern Med 154:209–217

    Google Scholar 

  24. Block AJ (1993) Living wills are overrated. Chest 104:1645–1646

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy DJ, Burrows D, Santilli S et al (1994) Theinfluence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 330:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  26. Christakis NA, Asch DA (1993) Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support. Lancet 342:642–646

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schneiderman LJ, Faber-Langendoen K, Jecker NS (1994) Beyond futility to an ethic of care. Am J Med 96:110–114

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dunstan GR (1985) Hard questions in intensive care. Anaesthesia 40:479–482

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koch KA, Rodeffer HD, Wears RL (1994) Changing patterns of terminal care management in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:233–243

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, J.S., Michell, W.L., Morgan, C.J. et al. Limitation of life support: Frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 22, 1020–1025 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01699222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01699222

Key words

Navigation