Abstract
Six groups of rats (N=8), trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (5 or 20 mg/kg), pentobarbital (5 or 15 mg/kg) or ethanol (750 or 1500 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, were tested for stimulus generalization with the three drugs. Training drug, but not training dose, affected the extent of generalization to a test drug; symmetrical generalization between chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital and asymmetrical generalization between chlordiazepoxide and ethanol and between pentobarbital and ethanol was observed. Training dose level affected (1) slope and ED50 of the generalization gradients of training drugs and substitution drugs, (2) discriminative performance, (3) response bias and (4) threshold dose for response suppression. Indices of lever selection and percentage drug-appropriate lever responses yielded similar generalization maxima, slopes and ED50s. The potency of chlordiazepoxide relative to the potency of pentobarbital to induce drug stimulus generalization varied across the experimental groups. The results indicate differences between the discriminative effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol. It is suggested that the discriminative effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol are not based on their response rate modulating effects and that training dose is not a determinant for the extent of cross-generalization between these compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry III H (1978) Stimulus attributes of drugs. In: Anisman H, Bignami G (eds) Psychopharmacology of aversively motivated behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 455–485
Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1977) Discriminable stimuli produced by alcohol and other CNS depressants. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 73–92
Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1978) Similarities and differences in discriminative stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, ethanol, and other sedatives. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans, JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Ten years of progress. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 31–51
Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1979) Differential stimulus attributes of chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital. Neuropharmacology 18:991–998
Colpaert FC, Janssen PAJ (1981) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effect of frustrative non-reward in fentanyl-saline discrimination. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 254:241–251
Colpaert FC, Janssen PAJ (1982) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination. Neuropharmacology 21:1187–1194
Colpaert FC, Desmedt LKC, Janssen PAJ (1976a) Discriminative stimulus properties of benzodiazepines, barbiturates and pharmacologically related drugs, relation to some intrinsic and anticonvulsant effects. Eur J Pharmacol 37:113–123
Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976b) Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 46:169–177
Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1980a) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effects of training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination. Neuropharmacology 19:705–713
Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1980b) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanylsaline discrimination. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212:474–480
De Vry J, Slangen JL (1985) Differential interactions between chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and benzodiazepine antagonists Ro 15-1788 and CGS 8216 in a drug discrimination procedure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (in press)
Herling S, Valentino RJ, Winger GD (1980) Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons. Psychopharmacology 71:21–28
Järbe TUC, Swedberg MDB (1982) Differences in the stimulus effects of CNS depressant drugs as evidenced by drug vs drug discrimination procedures. Psychopharmacology 76:A8
Koek W, Slangen JL (1982) The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization. Psychopharmacology 76:149–156
Krimmer EC (1974) Drugs as discriminative stimuli. Diss Abstr Int 35:4572-B
Kubena RK, Barry III H (1969) Generalization by rats of alcohol and atropine stimulus characteristics to other drugs. Psychopharmacologia 15:196–206
Kuhn DM, Appel JB, Greenberg J (1974) An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia 39:57–66
Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31
Overton DA (1977) Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital and phenobarbital using drug vs drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53:195–199
Shannon HE, Herling S (1983) Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats: evidence for a maximal effect. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:161–166
Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303
Teal JJ, Holtzman SG (1980) Stimulus effects of morphine in the monkey: quantitative analysis of antagonism. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:587–593
White FJ, Appel JB (1982) Training dose as a factor in LSD-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 76:20–25
Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
York JL (1978) A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital and phentobarbital in rats. Psychopharmacology 60:19–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: J. De Vry
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Vry, J., Slangen, J.L. Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat. Psychopharmacology 88, 341–345 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180836
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180836