Abstract
The present experiments investigated sex differences in the effects of d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled behavior. Male and female Wistar rats were exposed to either a differential reinforcement of low rate 15 s schedule, or a differential reinforcement of high rate 0.75 s schedule and challenged with different doses of d-amphetamine (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg). d-Amphetamine in low to moderate doses increased low response rates. High doses of d-amphetamine decreased low and high response rates in both males and females. The response rate increasing effects of d-amphetamine on low baseline rates were significantly higher for females than for males. Sex differences for high baseline rates were not observed. The results of these experiments show not only that hormonal and neurochemical variables influence the effects of d-amphetamine administration on schedule-controlled behavior, but also that environmental contingencies maintaining the behavior can modify these effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty WW, Holzer GH (1978) Sex differences in stereotyped behavior in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:777–783
Beatty WW, Dodge AM, Traylor KL (1982) Stereotyped behavior elicited by amphetamine in the rat: influences of the testes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:565–568
Becker JB, Lorenz KA, Robinson TL (1981) Amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior: sex differences and estrus cycle variations are not due to differences in brain levels of amphetamine. Soc Neurosci Abstr 7:41
Cole SO (1978) Brain mechanisms of amphetamine-induced anorexia, locomotion and stereotypy: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2:89–100
Dews PB, Wenger GR (1977) Rate dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In: Thompson T and Dews PB (Eds) Adv Behav Pharmacol (vol 1) Academic Press, New York
Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 80:67–73
Gropetti A, Costa E (1969) Factors affecting the rate and disappearance of amphetamine in rats. Int J Neuropharmacol 8:209–215
Hurwitz HMB, Davis H (1983) Depriving rats of food: a reappraisal of two techniques. J Exp Anal Behav 40:211–213
Koek W, Slangen JL (1984) Effects of d-amphetamine and morphine on delayed discrimination: signal detection analysis and assessment of response repitition in the performance deficits. Psychopharmacology 83:346–350
Meyer EM, Lytle LD (1978) Sex related differences in the physiological disposition of amphetamine and its metabolites in the rat. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 21:313–316
Morse WH, Kelleher RT (1977) Determinants of reinforcement and punishment. In: Honig WK and Staddon JER (Eds) Handbook of operant behavior, Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs
Robinson TE (1984) Behavioral sensitization: characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology 84:466–475
Robinson TE, Becker JB, Ramirez VD (1980) Sex differences in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior and the lateralization of striatal dopamine in rats. Brain Res Bull 5:539–545
Savageau MM, Beatty WW (1981) Gonadectomy and sex differences in the behavioral responses to amphetamine and apomorphine of rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:17–21
Schechter MD, Cook PG (1975) Dopaminergic mediation of the interoceptive cue produced by d-amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacologia 42:185–193
Schneider BF, Norton S (1979) Circadian and sex differences in hyperactivity produced by amphetamine in rats. Physiol Behav 22:47–51
Schrot J, Thomas JR (1983) Alteration of response patterning by d-amphetamine on repeated acquisition in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:529–534
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Haaren, F., Heinsbroek, R.P.W., Louwerse, A. et al. d-Amphetamine differentially affects low, but not high response rates of male and female Wistar rats. Psychopharmacology 89, 73–76 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175193
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175193