Skip to main content
Log in

Landscape analysis: Theoretical considerations and practical needs

  • Published:
Environmental Geology and Water Sciences

Abstract

Numerous systems of land classification have been proposed. Most have led directly to or have been driven by an author's philosophy of earth-forming processes. However, the practical need of classifying land for planning and management purposes requires that a system lead to predictions of the results of management activities.

We propose a landscape classification system composed of 11 units, from realm (a continental mass) to feature (a splash impression). The classification concerns physical aspects rather than economic or social factors; and aims to merge land inventory with dynamic processes.

Landscape units are organized using a hierarchical system so that information may be assembled and communicated at different levels of scale and abstraction. Our classification uses a geomorphic systems approach that emphasizes the geologic-geomorphic attributes of the units.

Realm, major division, province, and section are formulated by subdividing large units into smaller ones. For the larger units we have followed Fenneman's delineations, which are well established in the North American literature. Areas and districts are aggregated into regions and regions into sections. Units smaller than areas have, in practice, been subdivided into zones and smaller units if required.

We developed the theoretical framework embodied in this classification from practical applications aimed at land use planning and land management in Maryland (eastern Piedmont Province near Baltimore) and Utah (eastern Uinta Mountains).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Bloom, A. L., 1978, Geomorphology—a systematic analysis of late cenozoic landforms: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 510 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büdel, J., 1982, Climatic geomorphology (trans, L. Fischer and D. Busche): Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 443 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves, E. T., 1979, Physiographic map of the White Marsh quadrangle;in E. T. Cleaves and others, White Marsh quadrangle: Geology, hydrology, and mineral resources: Maryland Geological Survey, Qd. Atlas No. 4, 3 maps.

  • Cleaves, E. T., W. P. Crowley, and K. R. Kuff, 1974, Towson quadrangle: Geologic and environmental atlas: Maryland Geological Survey, Qd. Atlas No. 2, 5 maps.

  • Cleaves, E. T., K. R. Kuff, W. P. Crowley, and J. Reinhardt, 1979, White Marsh quadrangle: Geology, hydrology, and mineral resources: Maryland Geological Survey, Qd. Atlas No. 4, 3 maps.

  • Davis, W. M., 1889, The rivers and valleys of Pennsylvania: National Geographic Magazine, v. 1, p. 183–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dott, R. H., Jr., and J. Bourgeois, 1982, Hummocky stratification: Significance of its variable bedding sequences: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 93, p. 663–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbridge, R. W., (ed.), 1968, The encyclopedia of geomorphology: New York, NY, Reinhold, 1295 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N. M., 1916, Physiographic divisions of the United States: Annals, Association of American Geographers, v. 6, p. 19–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N. M., 1928, Physiographic divisions of the United States: Annals, Association of American Geographers, v. 18, p. 261–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, H. F., 1974, The origin of landscapes: New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 734 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, M. R., R. McAfee, Jr., and C. I. Wolf (eds.), 1972, Glossary of geology: Washington, D.C., American Geological Institute, 847 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, A. E., 1975, Chemical and physical erosion in the south mountain anticlinorium, Maryland: Maryland Geology Survey, Info. Cir. 19, 35 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E. H., 1964, Analysis of properties in landform geography: An application to broad scale landform mapping: Annals, American Association Geographers, v. 54, no. 1, p. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbertson, A. J., 1905, The major natural regions: An essay in systemic geography: Geographical Journal, v. 20, p. 300–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. D., and L. E. Spock, 1940, Classification of landforms: Journal of Geomorphology, v. 3, p. 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. B., 1974, Geology of soils: San Francisco, CA, W. H. Freeman, 344 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbutt, J. A., 1968, Review of concepts of land classifications;in G. A. Stewart, ed., Land evaluation: CSIRO Symposium: Melbourne, Macmillan of Australia, p. 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton, B. P., 1968, Order and disorder in land:in G. A. Stewart, ed., Land evaluation: CSIRO Symposium: Melbourne, Macmillan of Australia, p. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigear, R. A. G., 1965, A technique of morphological mapping: Annals, American Association Geographers, v. 55, p. 514–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., and R. W. Lichty, 1965, Time, space, casualty in geomorphology: American Journal of Science, v. 263, p. 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, W. L., 1977, Subdivisions of the major physiographic provinces in Utah: Utah Geology, v. 4, no. 1, p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricart, J., and A. Cailleux, 1972, Introduction to climatic geomorphology: New York, NY, St. Martin's Press (trans. C. J. K. deJonge) 274 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, C. S., 1988, Introduction to theoretical geomorphology: Boston, MA, Unwin Hyman, 247 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, D. S., 1973, Terrain analysis: Stroundsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., 392 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. L., 1972, Principles in a geomorphological approach to land classification: Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, v. 16, p. 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey, A.E., Cleaves, E.T. Landscape analysis: Theoretical considerations and practical needs. Environ. Geol. Water Sci 17, 141–155 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701570

Keywords

Navigation