Skip to main content
Log in

The modern understanding of the glass electrode response

  • Lectures And Posters
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical experiments in combination with infrared spectroscopy and subsurface concentration profiling yielded information on ionic processes at the membrane surface of glass electrodes and resulted in a detailed mechanism of the glass electrode response. This “dissociation mechanism” is based on phase boundary equilibria between anionic groups at the glass surface and hydrogen or alkali ions in the solution, which control the potential of the glass and the concentrations of ions attached to the surface groups. The resulting concentration gradients between glass surface and bulk glass cause an interdiffusion of the different ions, if they are not hindered sterically to penetrate into the glass, and a diffusion potential beneath the glass surface. The interdiffusion determines the course of the glass corrosion, which thus depends on whether protons or alkali ions are attached to the surface and interdiffuse with the alkali ions of the glass, leading, respectively, to a steady-state leached layer or a continuously growing alkali-exchanged layer. pH electrodes with La2O3-containing membrane glasses show delayed interfering potential drifts in neutral and alkali phosphate and fluoride solutions caused by LaPO4 and LaF3 deposits, respectively, at the membrane surface (“phosphate” and “fluoride errors”). Equations for the phase boundary potential and phase boundary concentrations are derived on a thermodynamic and kinetic basis and are verified experimentally. Glass leaching and alkali ion interdiffusion are studied, and the diffusion potential within a leached layer is determined. The formation periods of pH and of pM glass electrodes are explained, and an indirect part of the sodium error and an irreversible sodium error are detected. Leached and alkali-exchanged layers consist of modified glass and are not “gel” layers as generally assumed. Large exchange current densities of the phase boundary equilibria explain the stability of glass electrode potentials. Migration experiments with subsequent concentration profiling showed that glasses can be alkali ion, proton, and mixed alkali ion-proton conductors and yielded concentration-dependent mobilities of lithium ions and replacing protons in a lithium silicate glass. The unchanged pH response of membranes before and after field-driven protonation, in alkali-free solutions, excludes the exchange of different ions as the origin of the glass electrode response, as assumed by the ion exchange theory, and verifies the dissociation mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nernst W (1892) J Phys Chem 9:137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cremer M (1906) Z Biol 47:562

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haber F, Klemensiewicz Z (1909) Z Phys Chem 67:385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwabe K, Dahms H (1961) Z Elektrochem, Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 65:518

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenman G (1967) In: Eisenman G (ed) Glass electrodes for hydrogen and other cations, chapter 5. Dekker, New York, pp 133–173

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolsky BP (1937) Acta Physicochim USSR 7:597

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenman G, Rudin DO, Casby JO (1957) Science 126:831

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karreman G, Eisenman G (1962) Bull Math Biophys 24:413

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolsky BP, Shultz MM, Belijustin AA, Lev AA (1967) In: Eisenman G (ed) Glass electrodes for hydrogen and other cations, chapter 6. Dekker, New York, pp 174–222

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenman G (1962) Biophys J [Suppl]:2(2):259

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cammann K (1975) Dissertation, Munich

  12. Boksay Z, Bouquet G, Dobos S (1967) Phys Chem Glasses 8:140

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bach H (1970) Z Angew Phys 28:239

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bach H, Baucke FGK (1971) Electrochim Acta 16:1311

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baucke FGK (1974) J Noncryst Solids 14:13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baucke FGK (1975) J Noncryst Solids 19:75

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baucke FGK (1977) In: Pungor E (ed) Ion-selective electrodes. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 215–234

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baucke FGK (1981) In: The glassy state. Proceedings of the All-Union Conference, Leningrad, October 13–15, 1981 (Acad Sci USSR, Leningrad 1983), p 96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bach H, Baucke FGK (1974) Phys Chem Glasses 15:123

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baucke FGK (1975) In: Cooper AR, Heuer AH (eds) Proceedings of the 9th University Conference on Ceram Science, June 3–5, 1974, Cleveland, p 337

  21. Baucke FGK (1980) J Noncryst Solids 40:159

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baucke FGK (1977) In: Frischat GH (ed) The physics of non-crystalline solids. Trans Tech Publ, Aedermannsdorf, p 503

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baucke FGK (1977) In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Glass, CVTS Dům techniky Praha, Prague, p 347

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duffy JA, Baucke FGK (1980) J Electrochem Soc 127:2230

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baucke FGK, Bach H (1982) J Amer Ceram Soc 65:534

    Google Scholar 

  26. Duffy JA, Baucke FGK (1983) J Chem Soc Farad Trans A 79:661

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baucke FGK (1987) Diff and Defect Data 53–54:197

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baucke FGK (1991) J Noncryst Solids 129:233

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baucke FGK (1985) J Noncryst Solids 73:215

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baucke FGK (1985) In: Proceedings of the Conference on Glass Current Issues, Tenerife, Spain, April 2–13, 1984. NATO ASI Series, Appl Sci Eng. Nijhoff, The Hague, p 481

  31. Bach H, Baucke FGK (1982) J Am Ceram Soc 65:527

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lanford WA (1978) Nucl Instrum & Methods 149:1

    Google Scholar 

  33. Engelmann C, Nens B, Trocellier P (1981) Verres Refract 36:486

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baucke FGK (1994) J Electroanal Chem 367:131

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guggenheim EA (1967) Thermodynamics. Wiley, Amsterdam New York, pp 298–299

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schwabe K, Dahms H (1959) Monatsber Deutsch Akad Wiss Berlin 1:279

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hammond PR (1962) Chem Ind (London), p 311

  38. Wikby A (1974) Phys Chem Glasses 15:37

    Google Scholar 

  39. Eisenman G (1965) Adv Anal Chem Instr 4:213

    Google Scholar 

  40. Conti F, Eisenman G (1965) Biophysical J 5:247

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dutz H (1966) Glastechn Ber 39:139

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cammann K (1977) Das Arbeiten mit ionenselektiven Elektroden, 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 57

    Google Scholar 

  43. US Pat No 4,028,196. June 7 (1977)

  44. Rechnitz GA (1967) In: Eisenman G (ed) Glass electrodes for hydrogen and other cations. Dekker, New York, p 331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baucke, F.G.K. The modern understanding of the glass electrode response. Fresenius J Anal Chem 349, 582–596 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323462

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323462

Keywords

Navigation