Skip to main content
Log in

On the form of the internal model for reaching

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated, by using simulations, possible mechanisms responsible for the errors in the direction of arm movements exhibited by deafferented patients. Two aspects of altered feedforward control were evaluated: the inability to sense initial conditions and the degradation of an internal model. A simulation which assumed no compensation for variations in initial arm configuration failed to reproduce the characteristic pattern of errors. In contrast, a simulation that assumed random variability in the generation of joint torque resulted in a distribution of handpaths which resembled some aspects of the pattern of errors exhibited by deafferented patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkeson CG (1989) Learning arm movement kinematics and dynamics. Ann Rev Neurosci 12:157–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossom J (1974) Movement without proprioception. Brain Res 71:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders M (1991) Temporal patterns of muscle activation for arm movements in three-dimensional space. J Neurosci 11:2680–2693

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget R and Lamarre Y (1987) Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback. Hum Neurobiol 6:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change of target location. J Neurophysiol46:725–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE, Schwartz AB (1988) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-directional space. II. Coding of the direction by a neuronal population. J Neurosci 8:2928–2937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quat Biol 55:837–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF (1993) Programming of extent and direction in human reaching movements. Biomed Res 14 Suppl 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1992) Role of proprioceptors in neural control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2:824–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z, Stuart DG (1988) Animal solutions to problems of movement control: the role of proprioceptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 11:199–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Flash T (1987) Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination. Trends Neurosci 10:170–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM (1984) Dynamic scaling of manipulator trajectories. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 106:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Atkeson CG (1987) Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: pitfalls and possibilities. Biol Cybern 56:279–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ (1958) Effect of deafferentiation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science 128:842–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ (1963) Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol 7:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF, Terzuolo CA (1982) Some factors pertinent to the organization and control of arm movements. Brain Res 252:394–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell JC, Taub MM, Day BL, Obeso JA, Thomas PK, Marsden CD (1982) Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain 105:515–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C (1993) Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 5:2136–2147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN, Mauritz KH, Dalakas MC, Evarts EV (1985) Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Hum Neurobiol 4:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Zernicke RF (1987) Predictions for neural control based on limb dynamics. Trends Neurosci 10:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1991) Deducing central algorithms of arm movement control from kinematics. In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, New York, pp 293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1981) Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1:710–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taub E, Berman AJ (1963) Avoidance conditioning in the absence of relevant proprioceptive and exteroceptive feedback. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56:1012–1016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buneo, C.A., Boline, J., Soechting, J.F. et al. On the form of the internal model for reaching. Exp Brain Res 104, 467–479 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231981

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231981

Key words

Navigation